Metal injection moulding of a thin surgical component using a palm-stearin based SS316L feedstock was investigated. The study first determined the optimal solids loading of the feedstock, followed by examining its sensitivity to the shear rate and temperature, to ensure its pseudo-plastic behaviour. After developing the Mouldability index, a process window was established based on the experiments to present appropriate injection parameters. Using the analysis of variance, the significance and mutual coupling of each parameter was evaluated. The study found that the impact of injection speed was greater than other parameters, while holding pressure showed little effect. The verified optimised injection parameters to maximise the green density were found to be an injection temperature of 155 °C, an injection speed of 80 mm/s, a holding pressure of 83 bar, a holding time of 9 s, and an injection pressure of 132 bar, resulting in a green part density of 4.892 g/cm3.
SulongABMuhamadNArifinA, et al.Optimizing injection parameter of metal injection molding processes using the feedstock of 16 μm stainless steel powder (SS316L), PEG, PMMA and stearic acid. J Appl Sci Res2012; 8: 2998–3003.
2.
AtreSVWeaverTJGermanRM. Injection molding of metals and ceramics, metal powder industries federation, 1998. DOI: 10.4271/982417.
3.
ChuaMIHSulongABAbdullahMF, et al.Optimization of injection molding and solvent debinding parameters of stainless steel powder (SS316L) based feedstock for metal injection molding. Sains Malays2013; 42: 1743–1750.
4.
ZhuSWangGZhaoY, et al.Biocompatibility of MIM 316L stainless steel. J Cent South Univ Technol2005; 12: 9–11.
5.
KultamaaMGunellMMönkkönenK, et al.Antimicrobial activity of porous metal injection molded (MIM) 316L stainless steel by Zn, Cu and Ag electrodeposition. Surf Interfac2023; 38: 102778.
6.
Nurul HafizaMJAhmad HafizZZunariahB, et al.The in vivo study of metal injection moulding 316L stainless steel fracture fixation plate. Adv Mater Res2016; 1133: 95–98.
7.
OmarMADaviesHAMesserPF, et al.The influence of PMMA content on the properties of 316L stainless steel MIM compact. J Mater Process Technol2001; 113: 477–481.
8.
HuangM-SHsuH-C. Effect of backbone polymer on properties of 316L stainless steel MIM compact. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209: 5527–5535.
9.
OmarMASubukiIAbdullahN, et al.The influence of palm stearin content on the rheological behaviour of 316L stainless steel MIM compact. J Sci Technol2010; 2:1–14.
10.
DaviesPADunstanGRHeaneyDF, et al.Comparison of master alloy and pre-alloyed 316l stainless steel powders for metal injection molding (MIM). In: PM2TEC 2004 world congress. Chicago: MPIF, 2004.
11.
IslamSTSamantaSKRoyH, et al.Rheological behavior of 316L stainless steel feedstock for µ-MIM. Mater Today Proc2018; 5: 8152–8158.
12.
HuangMSHsuHC. Influence of injection moulding and sintering parameters on properties of 316L MIM compact. Powder Metall2011; 54: 299–307.
13.
BergincBKampusZSustarsicB. Influence of feedstock characteristics and process parameters on properties of MIM parts made of 316L. Powder Metall2007; 50: 172–183.
14.
Bin AbdullahANBinti JohariNBin Suleiman AhmadMJ, et al.Analysis of the rheological behavior and stability of Inconel 718 powder injection molding (PIM) feedstock. Adv Mater Res2014; 879: 63–72.
15.
OmarMASubukiI. Sintering characteristics of injection moulded 316L component using palm-based biopolymer binder. In: Sintering-methods and products. UK: IntechOpen Limited, 2012, pp.127–146.
16.
HarunMRMuhamadNSulongAB, et al.Rheological investigation of ZK60 magnesium alloy feedstock for metal injection moulding using palm stearin based binder system. Appl Mech Mater|2011; 44–47: 4126–4130.
17.
Mohamad NorNHMuhamadNIbrahimMHI, et al.Optimization of injection molding parameter of Ti-6Al-4V powder mix with palm stearin and polyethylene for the highest green strength by using Taguchi method. Int J Mech Mater Eng2011; 6: 126–132.
18.
OmarMASubukiIAbdullahNS, et al.Processing of water-atomised 316L stainless steel powder using metal-injection processes. J Eng Sci2012; 8: 1–13.
19.
OmarMASubukiIAbdullahN, et al.Production of medical devices prototype through metal injection moulding technique. Mater Res Innov2009; 13: 320–322.
20.
AskariAAlaeiMHMehdipoor OmraniA, et al.Rheological and thermal characterization of AISI 4605 low-alloy steel feedstock for metal injection molding process. Met Mater Int2020; 26: 1820–1829.
21.
SubukiI. Injection moulding of 316l stainless steel powder using palm stearin based binder system. PhD Thesis, 2010.
22.
GalCWOhJWSongGW, et al.Rheological and thermal debinding behaviors of silicon nitride in powder injection molding. Ceram Int2019; 45: 16982–16991.
23.
MomeniVAskariAAllaeiMH, et al.Investigating the effect of stearic acid on the mechanical, rheological, and microstructural properties of AISI 4605 feedstock for metal injection molding process. Trans Indian Inst Met2021; 74: 2161–2170.
24.
MomeniVAlaeiMHAskariA, et al.Effect of the fraction of steel 4605 powder in the load in injection molding with the use of a polymer-based binder. Met Sci Heat Treat2020; 61: 777–781.
25.
AminSYMMuhamadNJamaludinKR, et al.Characterization of the feedstock properties of metal injection-molded WC-Co with palm stearin binder system. Sains Malays2014; 43: 123–128.
26.
IslamSTSamantaSKLoharAK, et al.Rheological study of alumina feedstock for a micro-powder injection moulding application. Mater Res Express2019; 6: 095204.
LiDPanDZhangC, et al.Powder injection moulding of Inconel 713C alloy. Powder Metall2019; 62: 240–246.
30.
AbdoosHKhorsandHYousefiAA. Torque rheometry and rheological analysis of powder–polymer mixture for aluminum powder injection molding. Iran Polym J2014; 23: 745–755.
31.
HuangBLiangSQuX. The rheology of metal injection molding. J Mater Process Technol2003; 137: 132–137.
32.
CaoMYRheeBOChungCI. Usefulness of the viscosity measurement of feedstock in powder injection molding. Adv Powder Metall1991; 2: 59.
33.
ZakariaHMuhamadNSulongAB, et al.Moldability characteristics of 3 mol% yttria stabilized zirconia feedstock for micro-powder injection molding process. Sains Malays2014; 43: 129–136.
34.
KhakbizMSimchiABagheriR. Analysis of the rheological behavior and stability of 316L stainless steel-TiC powder injection molding feedstock. Mater Sci Eng A2005; 407: 105–113.
35.
Atre SV, Weaver TJ and German RM. Injection molding of metals and ceramics. In: SAE Tech. Pap., Metal Powder Industries Federation, 1998, p.413.
36.
ParkJMHanJSGalCW, et al.Effect of binder composition on rheological behavior of PMN-PZT ceramic feedstock. Powder Technol2018; 330: 19–26.
37.
AskariAMomeniV. Rheological investigation and injection optimization of Fe–2Ni–2Cu feedstock for metal injection molding process. Mater Chem Phys2021; 271: 124926.
38.
ParkSJWuYHeaneyDF, et al.Rheological and thermal debinding behaviors in titanium powder injection molding. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci2009; 40: 215–222.
39.
ParkDYLeeSWParkSJ, et al.Effects of particle sizes on sintering behavior of 316L stainless steel powder. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci2013; 44: 1508–1518.
AskariAAlaeiMMehdipoor OmraniA, et al.Critical powder volume concentration (CPVC) of Fe-2Ni low-alloy steel powder and selection of a proper binder system from rheological point of view in order to metal injection molding. Modares Mech Eng2020; 20: 1079–1088. http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-32453-en.html.
42.
HamidiMHarunWSWSamykanoM, et al.A review of biocompatible metal injection moulding process parameters for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C2017; 78: 1263–1276.
43.
MomeniVAskariAAlaeiMH, et al.The effect of powder loading and binder system on the mechanical, rheological and microstructural properties of 4605 powder in MIM process. Trans Indian Inst Met2019; 2: 1245–1254.
44.
SotomayorMEVárezALevenfeldB. Influence of powder particle size distribution on rheological properties of 316L powder injection moulding feedstocks. Powder Technol2010; 200: 30–36.
45.
SupatiRLohNKhorK, et al.Mixing and characterization of feedstock for powder injection molding. Mater Lett2000; 46: 109–114.
46.
OhJWSeongYParkSJ. Effect of nanoparticles in bimodal powder on physical and mechanical properties of powder injection molded parts. J Mater Process Technol2018; 262: 503–510.
47.
ParkJMHanJSOhJW, et al.Study on rheological behavior and mechanical properties of PMN–PZT ceramic feedstock. Met Mater Int2019; 27: 1069–1082.
48.
VirdhianSDoloksaribuMSupriadiS, et al.Characterization of 17-4 PH stainless steel metal injection molding feedstock using mixing torque data. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2020; 980: 012053.
49.
MachakaRNdlangamandlaPSeeraneM. Capillary rheological studies of 17-4 PH MIM feedstocks prepared using a custom CSIR binder system. Powder Technol2018; 326: 37–43.
50.
GermanRMBoseA. Injection molding of metals and ceramics. 1997, p. 413.
51.
OhJWLeeWSParkSJ. Thermal decomposition behavior of nano/micro bimodal feedstock with different solids loading. Met Mater Int2018; 24: 142–148.
LiuZYLohNHTorSB, et al.Micro-powder injection molding. J Mater Process Technol2002; 127: 165–168.
54.
OhJWLeeWSParkSJ. Influence of nano powder on rheological behavior of bimodal feedstock in powder injection molding. Powder Technol2017; 311: 18–24.
55.
SahuJNAcharyaJMeikapBC. Optimization of production conditions for activated carbons from Tamarind wood by zinc chloride using response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol2010; 101: 1974–1982.
56.
MehdiHMishraRS. An experimental analysis and optimization of process parameters of AA6061 and AA7075 welded joint by TIG + FSP welding using RSM. Adv Mater Process Technol2022; 8: 598–620.
57.
MomeniVAllaeiMH. Optimization of injection parameters in metal injection molding of 4605 low alloy steel. Modares Mech Eng2019; 19: 1199–1208.
58.
HeaneyDFGreeneCD. Molding of components in metal injection molding (MIM). In: Handbook of metal injection molding. UK: Woodhead publishing, 2019, pp.105–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102152-1.00008-8.
59.
EbelT. Metal injection molding (MIM) of titanium and titanium alloys. In: Handbook of metal injection molding. UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2019, pp.431–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102152-1.00023-4.
