Charles Lindblom , "Another State of Mind," American Political Science Review76, no. 1 (March 1982): 9-21, 10.
2.
Ibid., 12-14.
3.
Ibid., 17.
4.
Larry Bartels , "What’s the Matter with What’s the Matter with Kansas?"Quarterly Journal of Political Science1, no. 2 (March 2006): 201-26.
5.
Nolan McCarty, Keith Poole, and Howard Rosenthal , Polarizing America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006).
6.
Larry M. Bartels, "Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind," Perspectives on Politics 3, no. 1 (March 2005): 15-31; Benjamin I. Page and Lawrence R. Jacobs, Class War? What Americans Really Think about Economic Inequality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009).
7.
Larry M. Bartels, Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008); Michael Hout, Clem Brooks, and Jeff Manza, "The Democratic Class Struggle in the United States, 1948-1992," American Sociological Review 60, No. 6 (December 1995): 805-28; Clem Brooks and Jeff Manza, "The Social and Ideological Bases of Middle-Class Political Realignment in the United States, 1972 to 1992," American Sociological Review 62, No. 2 (April 1997): 191-208.
8.
Jeffrey Berry, The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2000); Jack Walker, "The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America," American Political Science Review 77, no. 2 (June 1983): 390-406.
9.
Ronald Rogowski, Commerce and Coalitions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989); Peter Trubowitz, Defining the National Interest: Conflict and Change in American Foreign Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
10.
Robert Keohane and Helen Milner, eds., Internationalization and Domestic Politics (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
11.
Jack Snyder, Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991).
12.
See Gosta Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990).
13.
Peter A. Hall and David Soskice, eds., Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).
14.
See Lance Kenworthy and Jonas Pontusson, "Rising Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Affluent Countries," Perspectives on Politics3, no. 3 (September 2005): 449-71.
15.
See Jacob Hacker , "Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States ," American Political Science Review98, no. 2 (May 2004): 243-60.
16.
Lawrence R. Jacobs and Theda Skocpol, eds., Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn (New York: Russell Sage, 2005). Among participants in this symposium, Jacob Hacker was a valued member of the Task Force.
17.
18.
Martin Gilens , "Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness," Public Opinion Quarterly69, no. 5 (2005): 778-96.
19.
Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson, "Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States," Politics & Society38(2) 152-204.
20.
Ibid., 165.
21.
Ibid., 154.
22.
Ibid., 174.
23.
Ibid., 175, 182.
24.
Ibid., 182.
25.
Lawrence R. Jacobs, "Building Reliable Theories of the Presidency ," Presidential Studies Quarterly39, no. 4 (December 2009): 771-80.
26.
Hacker and Pierson, "Winner-Take-All Politics," 167.
27.
Ibid., 154.
28.
For summary, see Lawrence R. Jacobs and Robert Y. Shapiro, Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Representation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000); and Lawrence R. Jacobs and Robert Y. Shapiro, "Issues, Candidate Image, and Priming: The Use of Private Polls in Kennedy’s 1960 Presidential Campaign," American Political Science Review 88, no. 3 (September 1994): 527-40.
29.
Lawrence R. Jacobs and Benjamin I. Page, "Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?"American Political Science Review99, no. 1 (February 2005): 107-24.
30.
Rogowski, Commerce and Coalitions; Trubowitz, Defining the National Interest.
31.
Lawrence D. Brown and Lawrence R. Jacobs, The Private Abuse of the Public Interest: Market Myths and Policy Muddles (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008).
32.
David M.Hart, "Business Is Not an Interest Group: On Companies in American National Politics," Annual Review of Political Science 7 ( 2004): 47-69, 49.
33.
Charles Cameron, Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000); Terry Moe, "Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: The Case of the NLRB," American Political Science Review 79, no. 4 (December 1985): 1094-1116; Andrew Rudalevige, Managing the President’s Program: Presidential Leadership and Legislative Policy Formulation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).
34.
Theda Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992); Theda Skocpol and Kenneth Finegold, "State Capacity and Economic Intervention in the Early New Deal," Political Science Quarterly 97 (1982): 255-77; Stephen Skowronek, Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920 (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982).
35.
Hacker and Pierson, "Winner-Take-All Politics," emphasis added.
36.
T.H. Marshall , Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1950), 34.
37.
Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, Democracy and Capitalism: Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought (New York: Basic Books, 1986); Esping-Andersen, Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism; Walter Korpi, The Democratic Class Struggle (London: Routledge, 1983).
38.
Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward, Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail (New York: Pantheon, 1977).
39.
Hall and Soskice, Varieties of Capitalism.
40.
Berry, New Liberalism; David Vogel, "The Power of Business in America: A Reappraisal," British Journal of Political Science 13, no. 1 (January 1983): 19-43: David Vogel, Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America (New York: Basic Books, 1989).
41.
Piven and Cloward, Poor People’s Movements; Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward, Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare (New York: Pantheon, 1971); Robert Y. Shapiro, The Dynamics of Public Opinion and Public Policy (PhD diss., University of Chicago, 1984); Stephen Ansolabehere, James M. Snyder, Jr., and Charles Stewart III, "Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections," American Journal of Political Science 45, no. 1 (January 2001): 136-59.
42.
Thomas Ferguson , Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics (New York: Hill and Wang, 1986).
43.
Thomas Ferguson and Joel Rogers, The Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics (New York: Hill and Wang, 1986); Mark Smith, American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).
44.
Gillian Tett, Fool’s Gold: How the Bold Dream of a Small Tribe at J.P. Morgan Was Corrupted by Wall Street Greed and Unleashed Catastrophe ( New York: Free Press, 2009).
45.
Hart, "Business Is Not an Interest Group"; Cathie Jo Martin, "Nature or Nurture? Sources of Firm Preference for National Health Reform,"American Political Science Review89, no. 4 (December 1995): 898-913.
46.
Lawrence Jacobs and Joe Soss, "The Politics of Inequality in America: Organized Theoretical Frameworks and Coherent Research," Annual Review of American Politics13: 341-364.
47.
Hacker and Pierson, "Winner-Take-All Politics ," 173, 168.