Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Politicized semantic change occurs when ideological actors strategically alter the meaning of existing terms to undermine opponents and to strengthen allies. We develop the concept of politicized pejoration through a case study of the term “woke” in the United States. This word originated in the US Black community as an encouragement to stay aware of social and racial injustices; it was subsequently transformed by the political right to indicate what it perceived as the left’s hypersensitivity and oppressive tendencies. We illustrate the process of pejoration by tracking usage of “woke” in mainstream media outlets, on Twitter and in Google searches from 2010 through 2022, combining quantitative text-as-data analyses with qualitative readings of media stories. Conceptualizing politicized pejoration as a form of politicized semantic change extends scholarly and public understanding of the politics of language.

Keywords

politics of language semantic change pejoration woke United States

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Azarbonyad

Dehghani

Beelen

, et al. (2017) Words are Malleable: Computing Semantic Shifts in Political and Media Discourse. arXiv. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05603 (accessed 6 August 2025).

Banaji

Fiske

Massey

(2021) Systemic Racism: Individuals and Interactions, Institutions and Society. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 6 (1): 82.

Beckham

(1972) Garvey Lives! A play. Available at: https://books.google.com/books/about/Garvey_Lives.html?id=MkpXAAAAYAAJ (accessed 15 September 2023).

Benford

Snow

(2000) Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611–639.

Bleich

Zsombok

Van der Veen

(2025) Social Proximity, Discursive Opportunity Structures, and the Diffusion of the Culture Wars: The Case of “Woke” in France. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. Epub ahead of print 6 August. DOI: 10.1177/00207152251358849.

Blommaert

(1997) Introduction: Language and Politics, Language Politics and Political Linguistics. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11 (1): 1–10.

Boholm

Rönnerstrand

Breitholtz

, et al. (2024) Can Political Dogwhistles Be Predicted by Distributional Methods for Analysis of Lexical Semantic Change? In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change, Bangkok, Thailand, 15 August, pp.144–157. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Brontsema

(2004) A Queer Revolution: Reconceptualizing the Debate Over Linguistic Reclamation. Colorado Research in Linguistics 17: 1–17.

Bruckner

(2017) There’s No Such Thing as Islamophobia: Critique of Religion Is a Fundamental Western Right, Not an Illness. City Journal. Available at: https://www.city-journal.org/article/theres-no-such-thing-as-islamophobia (accessed 6 August 2025).

10.

Butcher

Canaparo

(2024) Rejecting Critical Race Theory in State K–12 Laws. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.

11.

Cammaerts

(2022) The Abnormalisation of Social Justice: The “Anti-Woke Culture War” Discourse in the UK. Discourse & Society 33 (6): 730–743.

12.

Clark

M D

(2024) Refuse to Say Just What You Mean: Anti- “Woke” Rhetoric As an Exercise in Destructive Abstraction. Political Communication 41 (5): 839–844.

13.

Collier

Brady

Seawright

(2004) Critiques, Responses, and Trade-Offs: Drawing Together the Debate. In: Brady

Collier

(eds) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp.195–228.

14.

Delgado

Stefancic

(1998) Critical Race Theory: Past, Present, and Future. Current Legal Problems 51 (1): 467–491.

15.

Diagne

(2023) Négritude. In: Zalta

Nodelman

(eds) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/negritude/ (accessed 6 August 2025).

16.

Ding

Horning

Rho

(2023) Same Words, Different Meanings: Semantic Polarization in Broadcast Media Language Forecasts Polarity in Online Public Discourse. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 17: 161–172.

17.

Dunmire

(2012) Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language: Political Discourse Analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 6 (11): 735–751.

18.

Dunmire

(2023) Political Discourse Analysis and Critical Discourse Studies: Scope, Relations, Commitments. In: Cap

(ed.) Handbook of Political Discourse. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.109–127.

19.

Entman

(1993) Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.

20.

Fairclough

(2003) ‘Political Correctness’: The Politics of Culture and Language. Discourse & Society 14 (1): 17–28.

21.

Fairclough

(2013) Language and Power, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.

22.

Fairfield

Charman

(2022) Social Inquiry and Bayesian Inference: Rethinking Qualitative Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Florini

(2014) Tweets, Tweeps, and Signifyin’: Communication and Cultural Performance on “Black Twitter.” Television & New Media 15 (3): 223–237.

24.

Fortson

BWIV

(2003) An Approach to Semantic Change. In: Joseph

Janda

(eds) The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp.648–666.

25.

Freelon

McIlwain

Clark

(2016) Beyond the Hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the Online Struggle for Offline Justice. Washington, DC: Center for Media & Social Impact, American University. Available at: https://cmsimpact.org/resource/beyond-hashtags-ferguson-blacklivesmatter-online-struggle-offline-justice/ (accessed 6 August 2025).

26.

Galinsky

Wang

Whitson

, et al. (2013) The Reappropriation of Stigmatizing Labels: The Reciprocal Relationship Between Power and Self-Labeling. Psychological Science 24 (10): 2020–2029.

27.

Gerring

(2007) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Goertz

(2006) Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

29.

Graham

Smith

(2016) The Content of Our #Characters: Black Twitter as Counterpublic. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 2 (4): 433–449.

30.

Haney-López

(2014) Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

31.

Jeshion

(2020) Pride and Prejudiced: On the Reclamation of Slurs. Grazer Philosophische Studien 97 (1): 106–137.

32.

Lakoff

(2004) Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.

33.

(2023) Race on Campus. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 4 April. Available at: https://www.chronicle.com/newsletter/race-on-campus/2023-04-04?utm_source=Iterable&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=campaign_6544839_nl_Academe-Today_date_20230405&cid=at&source=ams&sourceid=&cid2=gen_login_refresh (accessed 6 August 2025).

34.

Luntz

(2007) Words That Work: It’s Not What You Say, It’s What People Hear. New York: Hyperion.

35.

Meagher

(2014) Family Taxes: Conservatives Frame Estate Tax Repeal. Journal of Policy History 26 (1): 73–102.

36.

Merolla

Ramakrishnan

Haynes

(2013) “Illegal,” ‘Undocumented,’ or ‘Unauthorized’: Equivalency Frames, Issue Frames, and Public Opinion on Immigration. Perspectives on Politics 11 (3): 789–807.

37.

Mufwene

Rickford

Bailey

, et al. (eds) (2021) African-american English: Structure, History, and Use. London: Routledge.

38.

Musolff

(2017) Metaphor, Irony and Sarcasm in Public Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 109: 95–104.

39.

Nelson

(2021) Emphasis Framing and Political Decision Making. In: Redlawsk

(ed.) Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.511–529.

40.

Nelson

Clawson

Oxley

(1997) Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance. American Political Science Review 91 (3): 567–583.

41.

Németh

(2023) A Scoping Review on the Use of Natural Language Processing in Research on Political Polarization: Trends and Research Prospects. Journal of Computational Social Science 6 (1): 289–313.

42.

Norris

Inglehart

(2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

43.

Orth

(2024) Few Americans Regularly Use Social-Justice Terms Such as Antiracism and Toxic Masculinity. YouGov, 20 November. Available at: https://today.yougov.com/society/articles/50975-few-americans-regularly-use-woke-or-social-justice-terms (accessed 6 August 2025).

44.

Perrin

(2015) Social Media Usage: 2005-2015. Pew Research Center, 8 October. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/10/08/social-networking-usage-2005-2015/ (accessed 6 August 2025).

45.

Quinn

(2023) Fla.’s Stop WOKE Act Remains Stymied. Inside Higher Ed, 16 March. Available at: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2023/03/17/floridas-stop-woke-act-continues-be-blocked-colleges (accessed 6 August 2025).

46.

Reinhard

(2023) Tracking the Attack on Critical Race Theory. CRT Forward: UCLA School of Law Critical Race Studies, 6 April. Available at: https://crtforward.law.ucla.edu/new-crt-forward-report-highlights-trends-in-2021-2022-anti-crt-measures/ (accessed 6 August 2025).

47.

Rodriguez

Spirling

Stewart

(2023) Embedding Regression: Models for Context-Specific Description and Inference. American Political Science Review 117 (4): 1255–1274.

48.

Scheufele

Tewksbury

(2007) Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models: Models of Media Effects. Journal of Communication 57 (1): 9–20.

49.

Smith

Brenner

(2012) Twitter Use 2012. Pew Internet Project, 31 May. Available at: https://www.pewinternet.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Twitter_Use_2012.pdf (accessed 6 August 2025).

50.

Sturaro

Suitner

Fasoli

(2023) When Is Self-Labeling Seen as Reclaiming? The Role of User and Observer’s Sexual Orientation in Processing Homophobic and Category Labels’ Use. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 42: 464–475.

51.

Taguieff

P-A

(1985) Le néo-racisme différentialiste. Sur l’ambiguïté d’une évidence commune et ses effets pervers. Langage et société 34 (1): 69–98.

52.

Traugott

(2017) Semantic Change. In: Aronoff

(ed.) Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.323 (accessed 6 August 2025).

53.

Van Dijk

(1993) Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283.

54.

Van Dijk

(1997) What Is Political Discourse Analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11: 11–52.

55.

Worthen

MGF

(2023) Queer Identities in the 21st Century: Reclamation and Stigma. Current Opinion in Psychology 49: 101512.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB