We contribute to the policy trade-offs literature by focusing on a principled trade-off that juxtaposes a widely desired objective with a moral belief and by examining how education conditions voters’ responses to this trade-off. Through survey experiments in Indonesia and Tunisia, we examine how voters respond to a liberal initiative to relax alcohol restrictions to raise revenue for social security and a conservative initiative to tighten alcohol restrictions even if it decreases social security revenue. We find that voters opposed the liberal initiative and that more educated voters supported the conservative initiative more than their less educated counterparts. These findings highlight the powerful constraints of moral beliefs even in the context of a trade-off with a common good and support the socialization perspective of education that portrays education as an institution that socializes individuals in the society’s dominant values—whether liberal or conservative—as opposed to simply a force for liberalization.
AdolphCBreunigCKoskiC (2020) The Political Economy of Budget Trade-Offs. Journal of Public Policy40 (1): 25–50.
2.
Al-AnsariBThowA-MDayCA, et al. (2016) Extent of Alcohol Prohibition in Civil Policy in Muslim Majority Countries: the Impact of Globalization. Addiction111 (10): 1703–1713.
3.
AlbertsonBL (2015) Dog-Whistle Politics: Multivocal Communication and Religious Appeals. Political Behavior37: 3–26.
ArceneauxK (2019) The Roots of Intolerance and Opposition to Compromise: The Effects of Absolutism on Political Attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences151: 109498.
6.
ArmingeonKBürgisserR (2021) Trade-Offs between Redistribution and Environmental Protection: the Role of Information, Ideology, and Self-Interest. Journal of European Public Policy28 (4): 489–509.
7.
AsadullahMN (2016) Trust, Trustworthiness, and Traditional Islamic Education. Oxford Development Studies44 (2): 152–166.
8.
BirdRM (2015) Tobacco and Alcohol Excise Taxes for Improving Public Health and Revenue Outcomes: Marrying Sin and Virtue? Policy Research Working Papers, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
9.
BoboLLicariFC (1989) Education and Political Tolerance: Testing the Effects of Cognitive Sophistication and Target Group Affect. Public Opinion Quarterly53 (3): 285–308.
10.
BorgonoviF (2012) The Relationship between Education and Levels of Trust and Tolerance in Europe. The British Journal of Sociology63 (1): 146–167.
11.
BrewerMB (1991) The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin17 (5): 475–482.
12.
BrookeS (2019) Winning Hearts and Votes: Social Services and the Islamist Political Advantage. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13.
BuehlerM (2016) The Politics of Shari’a Law: Islamist Activists and the State in Democratizing Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
BusemeyerMRGarritzmannJL (2017) Public Opinion on Policy and Budgetary Trade-Offs in European Welfare States: Evidence from a New Comparative Survey. Journal of European Public Policy24 (6): 871–889.
15.
CammettMIssarS (2010) Bricks and Mortar Clientelism: Sectarianism and the Logics of Welfare Allocation in Lebanon. World Politics62 (3): 381–421.
16.
CammettMLuongPJ (2014) Is There an Islamist Political Advantage?. Annual Review of Political Science17(1): 187–206.
17.
CampbellDE (2009) Civic Engagement and Education: An Empirical Test of the Sorting Model. American Journal of Political Science53 (4): 771–786.
18.
CarpiniMXDKeeterS (1997) What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters, Revised edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
CiftciS (2018) Self-Expression Values, Loyalty Generation, and Support for Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Arab World. Democratization25 (7): 1132–1152.
20.
CiftciS (2022) Islam, Justice, and Democracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
21.
CliffordS (2019) How Emotional Frames Moralize and Polarize Political Attitudes. Political Psychology40 (1): 75–91.
CoendersMScheepersP (2003) The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison. Political Psychology24 (2): 313–343.
24.
ColomboC (2021) Principled or Pragmatic? Morality Politics in Direct Democracy. British Journal of Political Science51 (2): 584–603.
25.
ConversePE (1972) Change in the American Electorate. In: CampbellAConversePE (eds) The Human Meaning of Social Change. New York: Russell SAGE Publishing, pp.263–337.
26.
DavisDWSilverBD (2004) Civil Liberties Vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science48 (1): 28–46.
27.
Del PonteADeltonAWDeScioliP (2021) Altruism and Spite in Politics: How the Mind Makes Welfare Tradeoffs About Political Parties. Political Behavior43: 1289–1310.
28.
DeltonAWDeScioliPRyanTJ (2020) Moral Obstinacy in Political Negotiations. Political Psychology41 (1): 3–20.
29.
DerryberryWPWilsonTSnyderH, et al. (2005) Moral Judgment Developmental Differences Between Gifted Youth and College Students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education17 (1): 6–19.
30.
D’HombresBNunziataL (2016) Wish You Were Here? Quasi-Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Education on Self-Reported Attitude toward Immigrants. European Economic Review90: 201–224.
31.
DomkeDShahDVWackmanDB (1998) ‘Moral Referendums’: Values, News Media, and the Process of Candidate Choice. Political Communication15 (3): 301–321.
32.
DriessenMD (2018) Sources of Muslim Democracy: The Supply and Demand of Religious Policies in the Muslim World. Democratization25 (1): 115–135.
33.
EganPJ (2013) Partisan Priorities: How Issue Ownership Drives and Distorts American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
FiskeAPTetlockPE (1997) Taboo Trade-Offs: Reactions to Transactions That Transgress the Spheres of Justice. Political Psychology18 (2): 255–297.
35.
FossatiDAspinallEMuhtadiB, et al. (2020) Ideological Representation in Clientelistic Democracies: The Indonesian Case. Electoral Studies63: 102111.
36.
FoxJ (2020) Thou Shalt Have No Other Gods before Me: Why Governments Discriminate against Religious Minorities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
GalstonWA (2001) Political Knowledge, Political Engagement, and Civic Education. Annual Review of Political Science4 (1): 217–234.
39.
GarrettKNBankertA (2020) The Moral Roots of Partisan Division: How Moral Conviction Heightens Affective Polarization. British Journal of Political Science50 (2): 621–640.
40.
GentzkowMAShapiroJM (2004) Media, Education and Anti-americanism in the Muslim World. Journal of Economic Perspectives18 (3): 117–133.
GrewalSJamalAAMasoudT, et al. (2019) Poverty and Divine Rewards: The Electoral Advantage of Islamist Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science63 (4): 859–874.
45.
GrönlundKMilnerH (2006) The Determinants of Political Knowledge in Comparative Perspective. Scandinavian Political Studies29 (4): 386–406.
46.
Grzymala-BusseA (2012) Why Comparative Politics Should Take Religion (More) Seriously. Annual Review of Political Science15 (1): 421–442.
47.
HainmuellerJHiscoxMJ (2007) Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe. International Organization61 (2): 399–442.
HäusermannSKurerTTraberD (2019) The Politics of Trade-Offs: Studying the Dynamics of Welfare State Reform With Conjoint Experiments. Comparative Political Studies52 (7): 1059–1095.
50.
HickenA (2011) Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science14 (1): 289–310.
51.
HolbeinJBHillygusDS (2020) Making Young Voters: Converting Civic Attitudes into Civic Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
HuijgenTVan BoxtelCVan De GriftW, et al. (2017) Toward Historical Perspective Taking: Students’ Reasoning When Contextualizing the Actions of People in the Past. Theory & Research in Social Education45 (1): 110–144.
53.
IannacconeLStarkRFinkeR (1998) Rationality and the “Religious Mind.”Economic Inquiry36 (3): 373–389.
54.
IncertiT (2020) Corruption Information and Vote Share: A Meta-Analysis and Lessons for Experimental Design. American Political Science Review114 (3): 761–774.
55.
IslamKMMAsadullahMN (2018) Gender Stereotypes and Education: A Comparative Content Analysis of Malaysian, Indonesian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi School Textbooks. PLoS One13 (1): e0190807.
56.
JacobsAM (2016) Policy Making for the Long Term in Advanced Democracies. Annual Review of Political Science19 (1): 433–454.
57.
JohnstonR (2006) Party Identification: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences?Annual Review of Political Science9 (1): 329–351.
58.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica47 (2): 263–291.
59.
LeirvikO (2004) Religious Education, Communal Identity and National Politics in the Muslim World. British Journal of Religious Education26 (3): 223–236.
60.
LotitoNJ (2019) Trade-Offs and Public Support for Security Reform during Democratic Transitions. Middle East Law and Governance11 (2): 180–202.
61.
LuttrellAPhilipp-MullerAPettyRE (2019) Challenging Moral Attitudes With Moral Messages. Psychological Science30 (8): 1136–1150.
62.
McDermottR (2011) Internal and External Validity. In: LupiaAGreeneDPKuklinskiJHet al. (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.27–40.
63.
MercerJ (2005) Prospect Theory and Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science8 (1): 1–21.
64.
Milli Piyango İdaresi (2023) Kamuya Aktarılanlar. Available at: http://www.mpi.gov.tr/node/26 (accessed 5 March 2023).
65.
NieNHJunnJStehlik-BarryK (1996) Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
66.
NucciLP (2001) Education in the Moral Domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PaglayanAS (2021) The Non-democratic Roots of Mass Education: Evidence from 200 Years. American Political Science Review115 (1): 179–198.
70.
PatilIZucchelliMMKoolW, et al. (2021) Reasoning Supports Utilitarian Resolutions to Moral Dilemmas across Diverse Measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology120 (2): 443–460.
71.
PepinskyTBLiddleRWMujaniS (2012) Testing Islam’s Political Advantage: Evidence from Indonesia. American Journal of Political Science56 (3): 584–600.
72.
PetrocikJR (1996) Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science40 (3): 825–850.
ReasonRD (2011) Expanding the Conversation: Perspective Taking as a Civic Outcome of College. Journal of College and Character12: 1–6.
75.
RosenfeldB (2021) The Autocratic Middle Class: How State Dependency Reduces the Demand for Democracy (Princeton Studies in Political Behavior). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
76.
RyanTJ (2014) Reconsidering Moral Issues in Politics. The Journal of Politics76 (2): 380–397.
77.
RyanTJ (2017) No Compromise: Political Consequences of Moralized Attitudes. American Journal of Political Science61 (2): 409–423.
78.
SelznickGJSteinbergS (1969) The Tenacity of Prejudice: Anti-Semitism in Contemporary America. New York: Harper & Row.
79.
SkitkaLJMorganGS (2014) The Social and Political Implications of Moral Conviction. Political Psychology35 (S1): 95–110.
80.
SkitkaLJWisneskiDC (2011) Moral Conviction and Emotion. Emotion Review3 (3): 328–330.
81.
StepanACRobertsonGB (2003) An “Arab” More Than a “Muslim” Democracy Gap. Journal of Democracy14 (3): 30–44.
82.
TangneyJPStuewigJMashekDJ (2007) Moral Emotions and Moral Behavior. Annual Review of Psychology58: 345–372.
83.
TanuwidjajaS (2010) Political Islam and Islamic Parties in Indonesia: Critically Assessing the Evidence of Islam’s Political Decline. Contemporary Southeast Asia32 (1): 29–49.
84.
TavitsM (2007) Principle Vs. Pragmatism: Policy Shifts and Political Competition. American Journal of Political Science51 (1): 151–165.
85.
ThomsenJPFOlsenM (2017) Re-examining Socialization Theory: How Does Democracy Influence the Impact of Education on Anti-foreigner Sentiment?British Journal of Political Science47 (4): 915–938.
86.
WangXFroeseP (2020) Attitudes Toward Religion and Believers in China: How Education Increases Tolerance of Individual Religious Differences and Intolerance of Religious Influence in Politics. Religion & Education47 (1): 98–117.
87.
WegnerECavatortaF (2019) Revisiting the Islamist–Secular Divide: Parties and Voters in the Arab World. International Political Science Review40 (4): 558–575.
88.
WeilFD (1985) The Variable Effects of Education on Liberal Attitudes: A Comparative- Historical Analysis of Anti-semitism Using Public Opinion Survey Data. American Sociological Review50 (4): 458–474.
89.
YsseldykRMathesonKAnismanH (2010) Religiosity as Identity: Toward an Understanding of Religion From a Social Identity Perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review14 (1): 60–71.
90.
ZhangTH (2022) Political Freedom, Education, and Value Liberalization and Deliberalization: A Cross-National Analysis of the World Values Survey, 1981-2014. The Social Science Journal59: 357–374.
91.
ZhangTHBrymR (2019) Tolerance of Homosexuality in 88 Countries: Education, Political Freedom, and Liberalism. Sociological Forum34 (2): 501–521.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
