Historical institutionalism has fruitfully moved beyond its initial focus on institutional effects to incorporate change. I argue, however, that the resulting advances have become misaligned with their conceptual bases. “Institutions as rules” was a useful first approximation, but it cannot accommodate changes in institutionalized practices occurring while sources of law remain the same. I propose reconceiving legal rules (material objects) and institutions (behavioral dispositions) as distinct elements that nonetheless remain fundamentally associated through the belief-shaping actions of specific groups. While rules change with the introduction of officially recognized materials, legal institutions change in response to new beliefs regarding what could pass as officially permissible. Far from a mere exercise in conceptual precision, the proposals draw distinctions that matter for description and explanation. In that regard, I show how the current literature mischaracterizes court-led change and how we might advance on the underexplored issue of collective meaning-making amidst unequal legal expertise.
AlbistonC (1999) The Rule of Law and the Litigation Process: The Paradox of Losing by Winning. Law & Society Review33 (4): 869–910.
2.
ArcherM (1995) Realist Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ArcherMElder-VassD (2012) Cultural System or Norm Circles? An Exchange. European Journal of Social Theory15 (1): 93–115.
4.
AzariJRSmithJK (2012) Unwritten Rules: Informal Institutions in Established Democracies. Perspectives on Politics10 (1): 37–55.
5.
BellS (2011) Do We Really Need a New “Constructivist Institutionalism” to Explain Institutional Change?British Journal of Political Science41 (4): 883–906.
6.
BeneshSCReddickM (2002) Overruled: An Event History Analysis of Lower Court Reaction to Supreme Court Alteration of Precedent. The Journal of Politics64 (2): 534–550.
7.
BerkGGalvanD (2009) How People Experience and Change Institutions: A Field Guide to Creative Syncretism. Theory and Society38 (6): 543–580.
8.
BerkGGalvanDCHattamVC (eds) (2013) Political Creativity: Reconfiguring Institutional Order and Change. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
9.
BhaskarR (1998) The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, 3rd edn.New York: Routledge.
10.
BhaskarR (2008) A Realist Theory of Science, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
11.
BlythMHelgadottirOKringW (2016) Ideas and Historical Institutionalism. In: FioretosOFalletiTGScheingateA (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.142–163.
12.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
BrinksDM (2006) The Rule of (Non)Law: Prosecuting Police Killings in Brazil and Argentina. In: HelmkeGLevitskyS (eds) Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press, pp.201–226.
14.
BrinksDMLevitskySMurilloMV (2019) Understanding Institutional Weakness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CalabresiSG (2008) How to Reverse Government Imposition of Immorality: A Strategy for Eroding Roe v. Wade. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy31 (1): 85–94.
16.
CalvertR (1995) Rational Actors, Equilibrium, and Social Institutions. In: KnightJSenedI (eds) Explaining Social Institutions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp.57–94.
17.
CapocciaG (2016) When Do Institutions “Bite”? Historical Institutionalism and the Politics of Institutional Change. Comparative Political Studies49 (8): 1095–1127.
18.
ChinchillaFA (2018) A Hard-To Situation: Informal Pacts, Kingpin Strategies, and Collective Violence in Mexico. Crime, Law and Social Change69 (4): 533–552.
19.
Cornut St-PierreP (2019) Investigating Legal Consciousness through the Technical Work of Elite Lawyers: A Case Study on Tax Avoidance. Law & Society Review53 (2): 323–352.
20.
CorralesJPenfoldM (2014) Manipulating Term Limits in Latin America. Journal of Democracy25 (4): 157–168.
21.
CotterrellR (2006) Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory. Aldershot: Ashgate.
22.
De Sá e SilvaF (2020) From Car Wash to Bolsonaro: Law and Lawyers in Brazil’s Illiberal Turn (2014–2018). Journal of Law and Society47 (S1): 90–110.
23.
DicksonJ (2007) Is the Rule of Recognition Really a Conventional Rule?Oxford Journal of Legal Studies27 (3): 373–402.
24.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1991) Introduction. In: PowellWWDiMaggioPJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of California Press, pp.1–38.
25.
DingXL (1994) Institutional Amphibiousness and the Transition from Communism: The Case of China. British Journal of Political Science24 (3): 293–318.
26.
DukeminierJKrierJ (2002) Property, 5th edn.New York: Aspen Law & Business.
27.
EdelmanLB (2004) The Legal Lives of Private Organizations. In: SaratA (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Law & Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 231–252.
28.
EdelmanLBUggenCErlangerHS (1999) The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth. American Journal of Sociology105 (2): 406–454.
29.
Elder-VassD (2010) The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Elder-VassD (2012) The Reality of Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Elder-VassD (2015) Collective Intentionality and Causal Powers. Journal of Social Ontology1 (2): 251–269.
32.
Elder-VassD (2017) Material Parts in Social Structures. Journal of Social Ontology3 (1): 89–105.
33.
EtchemendyMX (2016) New Directions in Legal Expressivism. Legal Theory22 (1): 1–21.
34.
EvansPRueschemeyerDSkocpolT (1985) Bringing the State Back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
EwickPSilbeySS (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
36.
FleetwoodS (2021) Re-visiting Rules and Norms. Review of Social Economy79 (4): 607–635.
37.
FriedmanL (2019) A History of American Law, 4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
GallagherME (2006) Mobilizing the Law in China: “Informed Disenchantment” and the Development of Legal Consciousness. Law & Society Review40 (4): 783–816.
39.
GerschewskiJ (2021) Explanations of Institutional Change: Reflecting on a “Missing Diagonal.”American Political Science Review115 (1): 218–233.
40.
GoertzG (2006) Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
GouldJBBarclayS (2012) Mind the Gap: The Place of Gap Studies in Sociolegal Scholarship. Annual Review of Law and Social Science8 (1): 323–335.
42.
GrattetRJennessV (2005) The Reconstitution of Law in Local Settings: Agency Discretion, Ambiguity, and a Surplus of Law in the Policing of Hate Crime. Law and Society Review39 (4): 893–940.
43.
GreifA (2006) Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
HackerJSPiersonPThelenK (2015) Drift and Conversion: Hidden Faces of Institutional Change. In: MahoneyJThelenK (eds) Advances in Historical Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 180–208.
45.
HadfieldGK (2000) The Price of Law: How the Market for Lawyers Distorts the Justice System. Michigan Law Review98 (4): 953–1006.
46.
HallPA (1986) Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
HallPA (2016) Politics as a Process Structured in Space and Time. In: FioretosOFalletiTScheingateA (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.31–50.
48.
HallPATaylorRCR (1996) Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies44 (5): 936–957.
49.
HallidayS (2004) Judicial Review and Compliance with Administrative Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
50.
HallidayS (2019) After Hegemony: The Varieties of Legal Consciousness Research. Social & Legal Studies28 (6): 859–878.
51.
HartH (1994) The Concept of Law, 2nd edn.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
52.
HathawayOA (2001) Path Dependence in the Law: The Course and Pattern of Legal Change in a Common Law System. Iowa Law Review86: 601–661.
53.
HayCWincottD (1998) Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism. Political Studies46: 951–957.
54.
HerrigelG (2008) Roles and Rules: Ambiguity, Experimentation and New Forms of Stakeholderism in Germany. Industrielle Beziehungen15 (2): 111–132.
55.
HodgsonGM (2006) What Are Institutions?Journal of Economic Issues XL (1): 1–25.
56.
HodgsonGM (2009) On the Institutional Foundations of Law: The Insufficiency of Custom and Private Ordering. Journal of Economic Issues43 (1): 143–166.
57.
HunterCBrethertonJHallidayS, et al. (2015) Legal Compliance in Street-Level Bureaucracy. Law and Policy38 (1): 81–95.
58.
ImmergutEM (1992) The Rules of the Game: The Logic of Health Policy-Making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden. In: SteinmoSThelenKLongstrethF (eds) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.57–89.
LevitskySMurilloV (2009) Variation in Institutional Strength. Annual Review of Political Science12 (1): 115–133.
61.
LukesS (1974) Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan Education UK.
62.
MacaulayS (1987) Images of Law in Everyday Life: The Lessons of School, Entertainment, and Spectator Sports. Law & Society Review21 (2): 185–218.
63.
MacCormickN (2008) H.L.A. Hart, 2nd edn.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
64.
MahoneyJ (2021) The Logic of Social Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
MahoneyJThelenK (2010) A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In: MahoneyJThelenK (eds) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–37.
66.
MarmorA (2006) How Law Is Like Chess. Legal Theory12 (4): 347–371.
67.
PepinskyT (2014) The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism. British Journal of Political Science44 (3): 631–653.
68.
PiersonP (2000) Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review94 (2): 251–267.
69.
PistorKXuC (2003) Incomplete Law. International Law and Politics35 (1): 931–1014.
70.
PorporaDV (1989) Four Concepts of Social Structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour19 (2): 195–211.
71.
PrzeworskiA (2004) Institutions Matter?Government and Opposition39 (4): 527–540.
72.
RaginCC (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73.
Rodríguez-GaravitoC (2011) Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America. Texas Law Review89: 1669–1698.
74.
RoeslerS (2007) Permutations of Judicial Power: The New Constitutionalism and the Expansion of Judicial Authority. Law & Social Inquiry32 (1): 545–579.
75.
RubinEL (2005) Beyond Camelot: Rethinking Politics and Law for the Modern State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
76.
SaratA (1990) ‘. . .The Law Is All Over’: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities2 (2): 343–379.
77.
SayerA (2010) Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
78.
ScheingateA (2010) Rethinking Rules: Creativity and Constraint in the U.S. House of Representatives. In: MahoneyJThelenK (eds) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.168–203.
79.
SchmidtVA (2008) Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science11 (1): 303–326.
80.
SearleJR (2010) Making the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81.
ShapiroS (2011) Legality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
82.
SilbeySS (2005) After Legal Consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science1 (1): 323–368.
83.
SpriggsJFHansfordTG (2001) Explaining the Overruling of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent. The Journal of Politics63 (4): 1091–1111.
84.
SteinmoS (1989) Political Institutions and Tax Policy in the United States, Sweden, and Britain. World Politics41 (4): 500–535.
85.
StreeckWThelenK (2005) Introduction. In: StreeckWThelenK (eds) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–39.
86.
TamanahaBZ (2017) A Realistic Theory of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87.
ThelenKSteinmoS (1992) Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. In: SteinmoSThelenKLongstrethF (eds) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–32.
88.
TohK (2005) Hart’s Expressivism and His Benthamite Project. Legal Theory11 (2): 75–123.
89.
TohK (2019) Legal Philosophy À La Carte. In: PlunkettDShapiroSTohK (eds) Dimensions of Normativity: New Essays on Metaethics and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.221–247.
90.
TurnerSP (1994) The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge and Presuppositions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
91.
WeaverVProwseGPistonS (2019) Too Much Knowledge, Too Little Power: An Assessment of Political Knowledge in Highly Policed Communities. The Journal of Politics81 (3): 1153–1166.
