Candidates with local ties perform better than their rivals without such attachments. We focus on the underlying mechanism of the localness effect and hypothesise that voters prefer local candidates for instrumental reasons, expecting better representation, and for reasons of a shared place identity. To test these expectations, we rely on the unusually detailed ballot for local elections in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia. Using multi-level regressions of the electoral results of 6503 candidates running in 21 cities in 2014, we confirm the importance of candidate localness for electoral success in low-information elections. Furthermore, we provide insights into the mechanisms behind this relationship. While instrumental motivations are independent of the composition of the electorate, a large share of elderly voters amplifies the identity effect, whereas many young voters, a high residential mobility, and a high population density diminishes this effect.
ArzheimerKEvansJ (2012) Geolocation and Voting: Candidate–Voter Distance Effects on Party Choice in the 2010 UK General Election in England. Political Geography31 (5): 301–310.
2.
ArzheimerKEvansJ (2014) Candidate Geolocation and Voter Choice in the 2013 English County Council Elections. Research and Politics1: 1–9.
3.
BartelsLM (1996) Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections. American Journal of Political Science40 (1): 194–230.
4.
BassiAMortonRBWilliamsKC (2011) The Effects of Identities, Incentives, and Information on Voting. The Journal of Politics73 (2): 558–571.
5.
BelancheDCasalóLVRubioMÁ (2021) Local Place Identity: A Comparison between Residents of Rural and Urban Communities. Journal of Rural Studies82: 242–252.
6.
BertelsmannStiftungDeutscherStädtetagDeutscher Städte- undGemeindebund (2008) Beruf Bürgermeister/in – Eine Bestandsaufnahme für Deutschland. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
7.
BerzJJankowskiM (2022) Local Preferences in Candidate Selection: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment among Party Leaders in Germany. Party Politics28 (6): 1136–1149.
8.
BieberIWingerterL (2022) Is It All a Question of the Electoral System? The Effects of Electoral System Types on the Representation of Women in German Municipal Councils. German Politics31 (4): 532–557.
9.
BieberIE (2013) Benachteiligung von Minderheiten Eine experimentelle Untersuchung der Wirkung des Kandidatengeschlechts und der -herkunft auf das Wählerverhalten (Koalitionen, Kandidaten, Kommunikation Analysen zur Bundestagswahl 2009). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
10.
CampbellRCowleyP (2014) What Voters Want: Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experiment. Political Studies62 (4): 745–765.
11.
CampbellRCowleyPVivyanN, et al. (2019) Why Friends and Neighbors? Explaining the Electoral Appeal of Local Roots. The Journal of Politics81 (3): 937–951.
12.
ChildsSCowleyP (2011) The Politics of Local Presence: Is There a Case for Descriptive Representation?Political Studies59 (1): 1–19.
13.
CollignonSSajuriaJ (2018) Local Means Local, Does It? Regional Identification and Preferences for Local Candidates. Electoral Studies56: 170–178.
14.
ConoverPJFeldmanS (1982) Projection and the Perception of Candidates’ Issue Positions. Western Political Quarterly35 (2): 228–244.
15.
ConoverPJFeldmanS (1989) Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes. American Journal of Political Science33 (4): 912–940.
16.
CramerK (2012) Putting Inequality in Its Place: Rural Consciousness and the Power of Perspective. American Political Science Review106 (3): 517–532.
17.
CubaLHummonDM (1993) A Place to Call Home: Identification With Dwelling, Community, and Region. The Sociological Quarterly34 (1): 111–131.
18.
DallagoLPerkinsDDSantinelloM, et al. (2009) Adolescent Place Attachment, Social Capital, and Perceived Safety: A Comparison of 13 Countries. American Journal of Community Psychology44 (1–2): 148–160.
19.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
20.
EnosR (2017) The Space between Us: Social Geography and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
EshimaSSmithDM (2022) Just a Number? Voter Evaluations of Age in Candidate-Choice Experiments. The Journal of Politics84 (3): 1856–1861.
22.
EvansJArzheimerKCampbellR, et al. (2017) Candidate Localness and Voter Choice in the 2015 General Election in England. Political Geography59: 61–71.
23.
FrendreisJTatalovichR (2021) Understudied Questions of Key’s Friends and Neighbors Voting Thesis. Social Science Quarterly102 (4): 1439–1450.
24.
FultonSAOndercinHL (2013) Does Sex Encourage Commitment? The Impact of Candidate Choices on the Time-To. Political Behavior35 (4): 665–686.
25.
GimpelJGKarnesKAMcTagueJ, et al. (2008) Distance-Decay in the Political Geography of Friends-and Voting. Political Geography27 (2): 231–252.
26.
GóreckiMABartnickiSAlimowskiM (2022) Local Voting at Local Elections Revisited: ‘Friends and Neighbors Voting’ at Mayoral Elections in Rural Poland. Political Geography94: 1–11.
27.
GrossM (2023) Determinants of Government Membership at the Subnational Level: Empirical Evidence from Large Cities in Germany (1999–2016). Government and Opposition58 (1): 145–161.
28.
GschwendTZittelT (2015) Do Constituency Candidates Matter in German Federal Elections? The Personal Vote as an Interactive Process. Electoral Studies39: 338–349.
29.
HeisigJPSchaefferM (2019) Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-Level Variable Involved in a Cross-Level Interaction. European Sociological Review35 (2): 258–279.
30.
HerronESLynchMS (2019) ‘Friends and Neighbors’ Voting Under Mixed-Member Majoritarian Electoral Systems: Evidence from Lithuania. Representation55 (1): 81–99.
31.
HolmanMRLayJC (2021) Are You Picking Up What I Am Laying Down? Ideology in Low-Information Elections. Urban Affairs Review57 (2): 315–341.
32.
HoltkampLGehneDH (2002) Bürgermeisterkandidaten zwischen Verwaltungsprofis, Parteisoldaten und Schützenkönigen. In: AndersenUBovermannR (eds) Im Westen Was Neues. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp.55–88.
33.
HuddyLTerkildsenN (1993) Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates. American Journal of Political Science37 (1): 119–147.
34.
JankowskiM (2016) Voting for Locals: Voters’ Information Processing Strategies in Open-List PR Systems. Electoral Studies43: 72–84.
35.
Kal MunisB (2021) Place, Candidate Roots, and Voter Preferences in an Age of Partisan Polarization: Observational and Experimental Evidence. Political Geography85: 102345.
36.
Kal MunisB (2022) Us Over Here Versus Them Over There. . .Literally: Measuring Place Resentment in American Politics. Political Behavior44: 1057–1078.
37.
KelleyJMcAllisterI (1984) Ballot Paper Cues and the Vote in Australia and Britain: Alphabetic Voting, Sex, and Title. The Public Opinion Quarterly48 (2): 452–466.
38.
KeyVO (1949) Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Alfred Knopf.
39.
KovarekD (2022) Distributive Politics as Behavioral Localism: Evidence from a Vignette Experiment in Hungary. Research & Politics9 (3): 1–7.
40.
KüblerDGoodmanC (2019) Newspaper Markets and Municipal Politics: How Audience and Congruence Increase Turnout in Local Elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties29 (1): 1–20.
41.
LewickaM (2011) Place Attachment: How Far Have We Come in the Last 40 Years?Journal of Environmental Psychology31 (3): 207–230.
42.
McDermottML (1997) Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections. American Journal of Political Science41 (1): 270–283.
43.
McDermottML (1998) Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections. Political Research Quarterly51 (4): 895–918.
44.
McElroyGMarshM (2010) Candidate Gender and Voter Choice: Analysis from a Multimember Preferential Voting System. Political Research Quarterly63 (4): 822–833.
45.
MansbridgeJ (1999) Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’. The Journal of Politics61 (3): 628–657.
46.
MechtelM (2014) It’s the Occupation, Stupid! Explaining Candidates’ Success in Low-Information Elections. European Journal of Political Economy33: 53–70.
47.
PanagopoulosCLeighleyJEHamelBT (2017) Are Voters Mobilized by a ‘Friend-And-Neighbor’ on the Ballot? Evidence from a Field Experiment. Political Behavior39 (4): 865–882.
48.
PrettyGHChipuerHMBramstonP (2003) Sense of Place Amongst Adolescents and Adults in Two Rural Australian Towns: The Discriminating Features of Place Attachment, Sense of Community and Place Dependence in Relation to Place Identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology23 (3): 273–287.
49.
RikerWHOrdeshookPC (1968) A Theory of the Calculus of Voting. The American Political Science Review62 (1): 25–42.
50.
RosarUKleinMBeckersT (2007) The Frog Pond Beauty Contest: Physical Attractiveness and Electoral Success of the Constituency Candidates at the North Rhine-Westphalia State Election of 2005. European Journal of Political Research47: 64–79.
51.
RubadoMEJenningsJT (2020) Political Consequences of the Endangered Local Watchdog: Newspaper Decline and Mayoral Elections in the United States. Urban Affairs Review56 (5): 1327–1356.
52.
RussoF (2011) The Constituency as a Focus of Representation: Studying the Italian Case through the Analysis of Parliamentary Questions. The Journal of Legislative Studies17 (3): 290–301.
53.
SällbergYHansenME (2020) Analysing the Importance of Localness for MP Campaigning and Legislative Performance. Representation56 (2): 215–227.
54.
Schulte-CloosJBauerPC (2021) Local Candidates, Place-Based Identities, and Electoral Success. Political Behavior. Available at: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11109-021-09712-y (accessed 03 November 2023)
55.
ShugartMSValdiniMESuominenK (2005) Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators Under Proportional Representation. American Journal of Political Science49 (2): 437–449.
56.
StokesDEMillerWE (1962) Party Government and the Saliency of Congress. Public Opinion Quarterly26 (4): 531–546.
57.
TrounstineJ (2013) Turnout and Incumbency in Local Elections. Urban Affairs Review49 (2): 167–189.
58.
TverskyAKahnemanD (1974) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in Judgments Reveal Some Heuristics of Thinking Under Uncertainty. Science185 (4157): 1124–1131.
59.
VidalTValeraSPeróM (2010) Place Attachment, Place Identity and Residential Mobility in Undergraduate Students. PsyEcology1 (3): 353–369.
60.
ZittelTNyhuisDBaumannM (2019) Geographic Representation in Party-Dominated Legislatures: A Quantitative Text Analysis of Parliamentary Questions in the German Bundestag. Legislative Studies Quarterly44 (4): 681–711.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
