Researchers are increasingly recognizing that social movements are crucial for realizing deliberative democratic values. However, this raises two important questions: (1) what actions should count as deliberation and (2) whether we should demand more from activists than merely provoking or encouraging deliberation in a society. Building on current research on activists’ actual engagement with deliberation, we argue that the standard of taking a “deliberative stance” (being respectful, sincere, and public-minded) is a good starting point for addressing both questions. By taking a deliberative stance, movements benefit from deliberation themselves and contribute to deliberative systems. However, we should also acknowledge that forms of deliberation change, and discovering new forms is a crucial part of what movements do for democracy. We propose to adopt a principle we call “reflective inclusion,” which allows us to engage abductively with new actions that might expand and deepen our understanding of what deliberation may look like.
AsenbaumH (2022) Doing Democratic Theory Democratically. International Journal of Qualitative Methods21: 16094069221105072.
2.
BächtigerADryzekJMansbridgeJ, et al. (2018) The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BächtigerANiemeyerSNebloM, et al. (2010) Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities. Journal of Political Philosophy18 (1): 32–63.
4.
BaiocchiGGanuzaE (2016) Popular Democracy: The Paradox of Participation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
BohmanJ (2000) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
BosiLGiugniMUbaK (eds) (2016) The Consequences of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BoswellJ (2021) Seeing Like a Citizen: How Being a Participant in a Citizens’ Assembly Changed Everything I Thought I Knew about Deliberative Minipublics. Journal of Deliberative Democracy17 (2): 1–12.
8.
Castelli GattinaraPPirroALP (2019) The Far Right as Social Movement. European Societies21 (4): 447–462.
9.
ChambersS (2009) Rhetoric and the Public Sphere Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?Political Theory37 (3): 323–350.
10.
ChambersSGastilJ (2021) Deliberation, Democracy, and the Digital Landscape. Political Studies69 (1): 3–6.
11.
CohenJLAratoA (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
CuratoN (2021) Interruptive Protests in Dysfunctional Deliberative Systems. Politics41: 388–403.
13.
CuratoNHammondMMinJB (2019) Power in Deliberative Democracy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
DeLucaMKPeeplesJ (2002) From Public Sphere to Public Screen: Democracy, Activism, and the “Violence” of Seattle. Critical Studies in Media Communication192: 125–151.
15.
Della PortaD (2005) Deliberation in Movement: Why and How to Study Deliberative Democracy and Social Movements. Acta Politica40 (3): 336–350.
16.
Della PortaDRuchtD (eds) (2013) Meeting Democracy. Power and Deliberation in Global Justice Movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Della PortaDPavanE (2017) Repertoires of Knowledge Practices: Social Movements in Times of Crisis. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal12 (4): 297–314.
18.
Della PortaDDoerrN (2018) Deliberation in Protests and Social Movements. In: BächtigerADryzekJSMansbridgeJ, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.392–406.
19.
DianiM (1992) The Concept of Social Movement. The Sociological Review40 (1): 1–25.
20.
DianiM (2003) Leaders or Brokers? Positions and Influence in Social Movement Networks. In: DianiMMcAdamD (eds) Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.105–122.
21.
DoerrN (2018) Political Translation: How Social Movement Democracies Survive (Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
DrakeA (2021) Activism, Inclusion, and the Challenges of Deliberative Democracy. Vancouver, BC, Canada: UBC Press.
23.
DryzekJS (1990) Discursive Democracy : Politics, Policy, and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
DryzekJS (2012) Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
DryzekJSStevensonH (2011) Global Democracy and Earth System Governance. Ecological Economics70 (11): 1865–1874.
26.
EhsTMokreM (2021) Deliberation against Participation? Yellow Vests and Grand Débat: A Perspective from Deliberative Theory. Political Studies Review19: 186–192.
27.
Extinction Rebellion UK (2020) Citizens’ Assembly. Extinction Rebellion UK (Blog). (accessed 13 January 2023).
28.
FelicettiA (2016) Deliberative Democracy and Social Movements. Transition Initiatives in the Public Sphere. New York and London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
29.
FelicettiA (2021) Learning from Democratic Practices: New Perspectives in Institutional Design. The Journal of Politics83: 1589–1601.
30.
FelicettiADella PortaD (2018) Between Deliberation and Contestation: The Convergence of Struggles against Austerity and Its World in the Nuit Debout Movement. Social Movement Studies17 (6): 658–675.
31.
FerreeMMGamsonWAGerhardsJ, et al. (2002) Four Models of the Public Sphere in Modern Democracies. Theory and Society31 (3): 289–324.
32.
FominayaCF (2017) European Anti-austerity and Pro-democracy Protests in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis. Social Movement Studies16 (1): 1–20.
33.
FominayaCFFeenstraRA (2019) Introduction: Contemporary European Social Movements: Democracy, Crisis and Contestation. In: FominayaCFFeenstraR (eds) Routledge Handbook of Contemporary European Social Movements. London: Routledge, pp.1–14.
34.
FraserN (1990) Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text25/26: 56–80.
35.
FreemanJ (1972) The Tyranny of Structurelessness. Berkeley Journal of Sociology17: 151–164.
36.
FungA (2005) Deliberation before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World. Political Theory33 (3): 397–419.
37.
GanzM (2009) Why David Sometimes Wins: Leadership, Organization, and Strategy in the California Farm Worker Movement. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
GanzMMcKennaE (2018) Bringing Leadership Back in. The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements, 185–202.
39.
GiugniM (2008) Political, Biographical, and Cultural Consequences of Social Movements. Sociology Compass2 (5): 1582–1600.
40.
GoodinR (2018) If Deliberation Is Everything, Maybe It’s Nothing. In: BächtigerADryzekJSMansbridgeJ, et al. (eds) Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.883–899.
41.
GrönlundKBächtigerASetäläM (eds) (2014) Deliberative Mini-publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process. Colchester: ECPR Press.
42.
GrunbergG (2019) Les « gilets Jaunes » Et La Crise De La Démocratie Représentative. Le Debat204 (2): 95–103.
43.
HabermasJ (1985) The Theory of Communicative Action I. 2 vols. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
44.
HabermasJ (1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
HabermasJ (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
HabermasJ (2001) Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?Political Theory29 (6): 766–781.
47.
HoldoM (2019) Sincerity as Strategy: Green Movements and the Problem of Reconciling Deliberative and Instrumental Action. Environmental Politics28 (4): 595–614.
48.
HoldoM (2020a) Meta-Deliberation: Everyday Acts of Critical Reflection in Deliberative Systems. Politics40 (1): 106–119.
49.
HoldoM (2020b) Violations of Basic Deliberative Norms: The Systemic Turn and Problems of Inclusion. Politics40 (3): 348–362.
50.
JanssonJ (2020) Crafting the Movement: Identity Entrepreneurs in the Swedish Trade Union Movement, 1920–1940. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
51.
KavadaA (2015) Creating the Collective: Social Media, the Occupy Movement and Its Constitution as a Collective Actor. Information, Communication & Society18 (8): 872–886.
52.
KimS (2020) Radical Democracy and Left Populism after the Squares: “Social Movement” (Ukraine), Podemos (Spain), and the Question of Organization. Contemporary Political Theory19 (2): 211–232.
53.
KohnM (2003) Radical Space: Building the House of the People. Ithaca, NY; London: Cornell University Press.
54.
LeeFLFChanMChenH-T (2020) Social Media and Protest Attitudes during Movement Abeyance: A Study of Hong Kong University Students. International Journal of Communication14: 4932–4951.
55.
McAdamD (2010) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
MansbridgeJJ (1983) Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57.
MansbridgeJJ (1996) Using Power/Fighting Power. In: BenhabibS (ed.) Democracy and Difference. Chichester: Princeton University Press, pp.46–66.
58.
MansbridgeJJ (1999) Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System. In: SMacedo (ed.) Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and DisagreementOxford: Oxford University Press pp. 1–211.
59.
MansbridgeJ (1994) Using Power/fighting Power. Constellations1 (1): 53–73.
MansbridgeJJBohmanJChambersS, et al. (2012) A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy. In: ParkinsonJMansbridgeJ (eds) Deliberative Systems. Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–26.
62.
MattoniACeccobelliD (2018) Comparing Hybrid Media Systems in the Digital Age: A Theoretical Framework for Analysis. European Journal of Communication33 (5): 540–557.
63.
MelucciA (1989) Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
64.
MendonçaRFErcanSA (2015) Deliberation and Protest: Strange Bedfellows? Revealing the Deliberative Potential of 2013 Protests in Turkey and Brazil. Policy Studies36 (3): 267–282.
65.
MendonçaRFErcanSAAsenbaumH (2020) More Than Words: A Multidimensional Approach to Deliberative Democracy. Political Studies70: 153–172.
66.
MichelsR (1962) Political Parties. A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy (trans. EdenPaulCedar). New York: Free Press.
67.
MontanaroL (2019) Discursive Exit. American Journal of Political Science63 (4): 875–887.
68.
MorrisADStaggenborgS (2004) Leadership in Social Movements. In: SnowDASouleSAKriesiH (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp.171–196.
69.
MouffeC (1999) Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?Social Research66: 745–758.
70.
MouffeC (2014) Democratic Politics and Conflict: An Agonistic Approach. In: LakitschM (ed.) Political Power Reconsidered: State Power and Civic Activism between Legitimacy and Violence. Münster: LIT Verlag, pp.17–29.
71.
NezHGanuzaE (2017) Among Militants and Deliberative Laboratories: The Indignados. In: TejerinaBPerugorríaI (eds) Crisis and Social Mobilization in Contemporary Spain. London: Routledge, pp.15–35.
72.
NummiJJenningsCFeaginJ (2019) #BlackLivesMatter: Innovative Black Resistance. Sociological Forum34: 1042–1064.
73.
ÖbergPOUbaK (2014) Civil Society Making Political Claims: Outcries, Interest Advocacy, and Deliberative Claims. Public Administration Review74 (3): 413–422.
74.
OwenDSmithG (2015) Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn. Journal of Political Philosophy23 (2): 213–234.
75.
PatemanC (2012) Participatory Democracy Revisited. Perspectives on Politics10 (1): 7–19.
76.
PollettaF (2002) Freedom Is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
77.
PollettaF (2015) Public Deliberation and Political Contention. In: LeeCWMcQuarrieMWalkerET (eds) Democratizing Inequalities: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation. New York: NYU Press, pp.222–244.
78.
PollettaF (2016) Social Movements in an Age of Participation. Mobilization: An International Quarterly21 (4): 485–497.
79.
RolloT (2017) Everyday Deeds: Enactive Protest, Exit, and Silence in Deliberative Systems. Political Theory45 (5): 587–609.
80.
RomanosE (2016) Immigrants as Brokers: Dialogical Diffusion from Spanish Indignados to Occupy Wall Street. Social Movement Studies15 (3): 247–262.
81.
RostbøllCF (2009) Dissent, Criticism, and Transformative Political Action in Deliberative Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy12 (1): 19–36.
82.
RothschildJAllen WhittJ (1989) The Cooperative Workplace: Potentials and Dilemmas of Organisational Democracy and Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Archive.
83.
ScudderMF (2020) The Ideal of Uptake in Democratic Deliberation. Political Studies68 (2): 504–522.
84.
ScudderMF (2021) Deliberative Democracy, More Than Deliberation. Political Studies. Epub ahead of print 12 August. DOI: 10.1177/00323217211032624.
85.
SetäläM (2014) The Public Sphere as a Site of Deliberation: An Analysis of Problems of Inclusion. In: ElstubS (ed.) Deliberative Democracy: Issues and Cases. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.149–165.
86.
SintomerY (2018) From Deliberative to Radical Democracy? Sortition and Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Politics & Society46 (3): 337–357.
87.
SkocpolTWilliamsonV (2016) The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
88.
SmithW (2016) The Boundaries of a Deliberative System: The Case of Disruptive Protest. Critical Policy Studies10 (2): 152–170.
89.
SmithW (2020) Deliberation in an Age of (Un) Civil Resistance. Journal of Deliberative Democracy16 (1): 14–19.
90.
SteinbergRL (2014) The Occupy Assembly: Discursive Experiments in Direct Democracy. Journal of Language and Politics13 (4): 702–731.
91.
StevensonHDryzekJS (2014) Democratizing Global Climate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92.
TalpinJ (2015) Democratic Innovations. In: Della PortaDDianiM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.781–792.
93.
TavoryITimmermansS (2014) Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
94.
TejerinaBPerugorríaI (2017) Beyond Austerity and Indignation: Embodiments, Spaces, and Networks in the 15M Movement: An Introduction. In: TejerinaBPerugorríaI (eds) Crisis and Social Mobilization in Contemporary Spain. London: Routledge, pp.1–14.
95.
UbaK (2016) Deliberative Protests? Persuading Politicians Not to Close Schools in Swedish Municipalities. Revista Internacional de Sociología74 (4): e046.
96.
WarrenM (2017) A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review111 (1): 39–53.
97.
YangG (2016) Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case of #BlackLivesMatter. Media and Communication4 (4): 13.
98.
YangS (2020) Enclave Deliberation and Social Movement Mobilization: The DDays in Occupy Central. Social Movement Studies19 (2): 144–159.
99.
YoungIM (2001) Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory29 (5): 670–690.
