Deliberative systems theory is a promising candidate for a normative theory of democracy that combines ideal requirements with feasibility. Yet, recent theoretical elaborations and studies of citizens’ online media use inspired by the theory suffer from an incomplete account of the public sphere’s epistemic function, too rough interpretations of participatory levels, shortcomings in the understanding of online media, and a context-insensitive notion of policy reform. Addressing these weaknesses, the article argues for a refined version of deliberative systems theory. Particular attention is given to feasibility considerations. Reviewing studies of online democracy in Norway, the article shows that the theoretical critique has practical significance. It is also argued that the amended version of the deliberative systems approach produces a diagnosis of Norwegian online democracy more in line with reasonable expectations to a high achiever. This is taken as a prima facie indicator of feasibility.
AlbrechtS (2006) Whose Voice Is Heard in Online Deliberation? A Study of Participation and Representation in Political Debates on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society9 (1): 62–82.
2.
AllernEHHeidarKKarlsenR (2015) After the Mass Party: Continuities and Change in Political Parties and Representation in Norway. London: Lexington.
3.
Alm AndreassenT (2016) Det organiserte sivilsamfunnet. In: FrønesIKjølsrødL (eds) Det norske samfunn. Oslo: Gyldendal, pp.90–113.
4.
BächtigerADryzekJSMansbridgeJ, et al. (2018) The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BakerM (2018) How Shall We Measure Our Progress? On Paradigms, Metaphors, and Meetings in Audience Research. Television & New Media20 (2): 130–141.
6.
BensonR (2019) Paywalls and Public Knowledge: How Can Journalism Provide Quality News for Everyone?Journalism20 (1): 146–149.
7.
BimberBCunillMCCopelandL, et al. (2015) Digital Media and Political Participation: The Moderating Role of Political Interest Across Acts and Over Time. Social Science Computer Review33 (1): 21–42.
8.
BlackLW (2009) Listening to the City: Difference, Identity, and Storytelling in Online Deliberative Groups. Journal of Public Deliberation5 (1): 1–35.
9.
BlekesauneAElvestadEAalbergT (2012) Tuning Out the World of News and Current Affairs: An Empirical Study of Europe’s Disconnected Citizens. European Sociological Review28 (1): 110–126.
10.
BohmanJ (2012) Representation in the Deliberative System. In: MansbridgeJParkinsonJ (eds) Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.72–94.
11.
BoswellJ (2015) Toxic Narratives in the Deliberative System: How the Ghost of Nanny Stalks the Obesity Debate. Policy Studies36 (3): 314–328.
BoulianneS (2009) Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research. Political Communication26 (2): 193–211.
14.
BoulianneS (2015) Social Media Use and Participation: A Analysis of Current Research. Information, Communication & Society18 (5): 524–538.
15.
BrunsA (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
16.
CairneyP (2016) The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
CarpiniMXDCookFLJacobsLR (2004) Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement. Annual Review of Political Science7: 315–344.
18.
ChambersS (2017) Balancing Epistemic Quality and Equal Participation in a System Approach to Deliberative Democracy. Social Epistemology31 (3): 266–276.
19.
ChristensenJHolstC (2017) Advisory Commissions, Academic Expertise and Democratic Legitimacy: The Case of Norway. Science and Public Policy44 (6): 821–833.
20.
ChristianoT (2012) Rational Deliberation Among Experts and Citizens. In: ParkinsonJMansbridgeJ (eds) Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.27–51.
21.
CohenGA (2008) Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
DahlgrenP (2018) Media, Knowledge and Trust: The Deepening Epistemic Crisis of Democracy. Javnost25 (1–2): 20–27.
23.
DodgeJ (2009) Environmental Justice and Deliberative Democracy: How Social Change Organizations Respond to Power in the Deliberative System. Policy and Society28 (3): 225–239.
24.
DryzekJBächtigerAChambersS, et al. (2019) The Crisis of Democracy and the Science of Deliberation. Science363 (6432): 1144–1146.
25.
Engelken-JorgeM (2018) Minimally Deliberative Deliberative Systems? Problematisation and the Deliberative Democratic Effects of Poorly Deliberative Communication. Political Studies66 (1): 137–153.
26.
EngelstadFHolstCAakvaagGC (2018) Democratic State and Democratic Society: Institutional Change in the Nordic Model. Berlin: de Gruyter.
27.
EnjolrasBKarslsenRSteen-JohnsenK, et al. (2013) Liker – liker ikke: Sosiale medier, samfunnsengasjement og offentlighet. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
28.
ErmanE (2016) Representation, Equality, and Inclusion in Deliberative Systems: Desiderata for a Good Account. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 (3): 263–282.
29.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
EstlundD (2008) Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
FishkinJLuskinRC (2005) Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion. Acta Politica40: 284–298.
32.
Gil de ZúñigaHDiehlT (2019) News Finds Me Perception and Democracy: Effects on Political Knowledge, Political Interest, and Voting. New Media & Society21 (6): 1253–1271.
33.
Gil de ZúñigaHMolyneuxLZhengP (2014) Social Media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships. Journal of Communication64 (4): 612–634.
34.
GilabertPLawford-SmithH (2012) Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration. Political Studies60: 809–825.
35.
GoldmanA (2011) Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust? In: GoldmanAWhitcombD (eds) Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.109–133.
GrahamTWitschgeT (2003) In Search of Online Deliberation: Towards a New Method for Examining the Quality of Online Discussions. Communications28 (2): 173–204.
38.
HabermasJ (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory on Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
39.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
HeissRMatthesJ (2019) Does Incidental Exposure on Social Media Equalize or Reinforce Participatory Gaps? Evidence from a Panel Study. New Media & Society21: 2463–2482.
41.
HolstCMolanderA (2018) Asymmetry, Disagreement and Biases: Epistemic Worries about Expertise. Social Epistemology32 (6): 358–371.
42.
HolstCMolanderA (2019) Epistemic Democracy and the Role of Experts. Contemporary Political Theory. Epub ahead of print 1January2019. DOI: 10.1057/s41296-018-00299-4.
43.
HovdenJF (in press) Political Publics, Political Participation and Social Class in Norway: A Multiple Factor Analysis, Unpublished Paper.
LafontC (2015) Deliberation, Participation, and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Mini-Publics Shape Public Policy?Journal of Political Philosophy23 (1): 40–63.
51.
LandwehrC (2015) Democratic Meta-Deliberation: Towards Reflective Institutional Design. Political Studies63 (51): 38–54.
52.
LarssonAMoeH (2014) Twitter in Politics and Elections Insights from Scandinavia. In: WellerKBrunsABurgessJ, et al. (eds) Twitter and Society. New York: Peter Lang, pp.319–330.
53.
LindvallJ (2017) Reform Capacity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
ListCValentiniL (2018) The Methodology of Political Theory. In: CappelenHGendlerTSHawthorneJ (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.525–553.
55.
MansbridgeJBohmanJChambersS, et al. (2012) A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy. In: ParkinsonJMansbridgeJ (eds) Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–26.
56.
MaynardJLWorsnipA (2018) Is There a Distinctively Political Normativity?Ethics128 (4): 756–787.
57.
MoeH (2016) Social Media. In: JensenKB (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
58.
MoeH (2019) Why Free News Matters for Social Inequality: Comparing Willingness to Pay for News in the Nordic Region. In: TrappelJ (ed.) Digital Media Inequalities: Policies Against Divides, Distrust and Discrimination. Gothenburg: Nordicom, pp.227–241.
59.
MoeHLarssonAO (2013) Representation or Participation? Twitter Use During the 2011 Danish Election Campaign. Javnost – The Public20: 71–88.
60.
MoeHHovdenJFYtre-ArneB, et al. (in press) Informerte borgere? Offentlig tilknytning, mediebruk og demokrati. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
61.
NOU 2017:7 (2017) Det norske mediemangfoldet – En styrket mediepolitikk for borgerne.
62.
OlsenJP (2017) Democratic Accountability, Political Order, and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63.
PrinzJRossiE (2017) Political Realism as Ideology Critique. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 (3): 348–365.
64.
PriorM (2007) Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65.
RawlsJ (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Colombia University Press.
66.
RossiESleatM (2014) Realism in Normative Political Theory. Philosophy Compass9 (10): 689–701.
67.
RothsteinB (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
RothsteinB (2011) The Quality of Government. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
69.
SenA (2009) The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70.
ShahDVChoJEvelandWPJ, et al. (2005) Information and Expression in a Digital Age: Modeling Internet Effects on Civic Participation. Communication Research32 (5): 531–565.
71.
SkoricMMZhuQGohD, et al. (2016) Social Media and Citizen Engagement: A Meta-Analytic Review. New Media & Society18(9): 1817–1839.
72.
SmithW (2016) The Boundaries of a Deliberative System: The Case of Disruptive Protest. Critical Policy Studies10: 152–170.
73.
StoycheffELuiJWibowoKA, et al. (2017) What Have We Learned about Social Media by Studying Facebook? A Decade in Review. New Media & Society19 (6): 968–980.
74.
StrandbergKGrönlundK (2018) Online Deliberation. In: BäctigerADryzekJSMansbridgeJ, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.365–377.
75.
SunsteinC (2018) #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
76.
SwartJPetersCBroersmaM (2018) Shedding Light on the Dark Social: The Connective Role of News and Journalism in Social Media Communities. New Media & Society20: 4329–4345.
77.
SwiftASWhiteS (2008) Political Theory, Social Science, and Real Politics. In: LeopoldDStearsM (eds) Political Theory Methods and Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.49–69.
78.
SyvertsenTEnliGSMjøsOJ, et al. (2014) The Media Welfare State: Nordic Media in the Digital Era. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
79.
TrenzHJ (2016) Narrating European Society: Toward a Sociology of European Integration. London: Lexington Books.
80.
ValentiniL (2012) Ideal vs. Non-Ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. Philosophy Compass7 (9): 654–664.
81.
ValenzuelaSHalpernDKatzJE, et al. (2019) The Paradox of Participation Versus Misinformation: Social Media, Political Engagement, and the Spread of Misinformation. Digital Journalism7: 802–823.
82.
ValerianiAVaccariC (2016) Accidental Exposure to Politics on Social Media as Online Participation Equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society18 (9): 1857–1874.
83.
VatnøyE (2017) The Rhetoric of Networked Publics: Studying Social Network Sites as Rhetorical Arenas for Political Talk. PhD Thesis, University of Bergen, Bergen.
84.
VerbaSNieNH (1972) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
85.
WaldronJ (2016) Political Political Theory: Essays on Institutions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86.
WesslerH (2008) Investigating Deliberativeness Comparatively. Political Communication25 (1): 1–22.
87.
WrightSStreetJ (2007) Democracy, Deliberation and Design: The Case of Online Discussion Forums. New Media & Society9 (5): 849–869.
