Previous studies have not examined whether (personal) political ideology influences how trusters perceive of immigrants and refugees as a threat. Our contribution to the literature builds on theories of motivated reasoning and hypothesizes that political ideology weakens the ability of social trust to reduce perceived (ethnic) outgroup threat. Indeed, analyses show that the relationship between social trust and perceived outgroup threat is considerably weaker among rightists than among leftists. Although social trust does relate negatively to perceived outgroup threat across the ideological divide, political ideology has a constraining influence that cannot be ignored. Social trust is also a political phenomenon. We apply a fixed-effects regression, and analyses are based on the 2014-European Social Survey, including 21 countries and 32,175 individuals. In the concluding section, we discuss the full implications of our findings for theories of social trust in an era of increasing flows of immigrants and refugees that go beyond the usual gateway nations.
ArndtCThomsenJPF (2019) Ethnicity Coding Revisited: Right-Wing Parties As Catalysts for Mobilization against Immigrant Welfare Rights. Scandinavian Political Studies42 (2): 93–117.
6.
BahryDKosolapovMKozyrevaP, et al. (2005) Ethnicity and Trust: Evidence from Russia. American Political Science Review99 (4): 521–532.
7.
BarcelóJ (2016) Attitudes toward Immigrants and Immigration Policy in Asia and the Pacific: A Quantitative Assessment of Current Theoretical Models beyond Western Countries. Asian Journal of Political Science24 (1): 87–123.
8.
BerningCCZillerC (2017) Social Trust and Radical Right-Wing Populist Party Preferences. Acta Politica52 (2): 198–217.
9.
BjørnskovC (2015) Social Trust Fosters an Ability to Help Those in Need: Jewish Refugees in the Nazi Era. Political Studies63 (4): 951–974.
10.
BrehmJRahnW (1997) Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital. American Journal of Political Science41 (3): 999–1023.
11.
ChangHIKangWC (2018) Trust, Economic Development and Attitudes toward Immigration. Canadian Journal of Political Science51 (2): 357–378.
12.
CitrinJSidesJ (2008) Immigration and the Imagined Community in Europe and the United States. Political Studies56 (1): 33–56.
13.
ColeA (2005) Old Right or New Right? The Ideological Positioning of Parties of the Far Right. European Journal of Political Research44 (2): 203–230.
14.
CôtéRREricksonBH (2009) Untangling the Roots of Tolerance: How Forms of Social Capital Shape Attitudes Toward Ethnic Minorities and Immigrants. American Behavioral Scientist52 (12): 1664–1689.
15.
DelheyJNewtonK (2005) Predicting Cross-National Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism?European Sociological Review21 (4): 311–327.
16.
DelheyJNewtonKWelzelC (2011) How General Is Trust in “Most People”? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem. American Sociological Review76 (5): 786–807.
17.
DinesenPT (2011) A Note on the Measurement of Generalized Trust of Immigrants and Natives. Social Indicators Research103 (1): 169–177.
18.
DinesenPTSønderskovKM (2012) Trust in a Time of Increasing Diversity: On the Relationship between Ethnic Heterogeneity and Social Trust in Denmark from 1979 until Today. Scandinavian Political Studies35 (4): 273–293.
19.
DinesenPTSønderskovKM (2015) Ethnic Diversity and Social Trust: Evidence from the Micro-Context. American Sociological Review80 (3): 550–573.
20.
DinesenPTSønderskovKM (2017) Ethnic Diversity and Social Trust: A Critical Review of the Literature and Suggestions for a Research Agenda. In: UslanerEM (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–32.
21.
EkiciTYucelD (2015) What Determines Religious and Racial Prejudice in Europe? The Effects of Religiosity and Trust. Social Indicators Research122 (1): 105–133.
22.
European Social Survey (ESS) (2014) ESS7-2014 Documentation Report: The ESS Data Archive. Edition 2.0. London: ESS ERIC.
23.
FedericoCM (2012) Ideology and Public Opinion. In: BerinskyAJ (ed.) New Directions in Public Opinion. London: Routledge, pp.79–100.
24.
FlanaganS (1987) Value Change in Industrial Society. American Political Science Review81 (4): 1303–1319.
25.
FreitagMTraunmüllerR (2009) Spheres of Trust: An Empirical Analysis of the Foundations of Particularised and Generalised Trust. European Journal of Political Research48 (6): 782–803.
26.
GlaeserELLaibsonDIScheinkmanJA, et al. (2000) Measuring Trust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics115 (3): 811–846.
27.
GonzálezKVVerkuytenMWeesieJ, et al. (2008) Prejudice Towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing Integrated Threat Theory. British Journal of Social Psychology47 (4): 667–685.
28.
HaidtJGrahamJJosephC (2009) Above and Below Left–Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations. Psychological Inquiry20 (2–3): 110–119.
29.
HardinR (1993) The Street-Level Epistemology of Trust. Politics and Society21 (4): 505–529.
30.
HardinR (2002) Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage.
31.
HerrerosFCriadoH (2009) Social Trust, Social Capital and Perceptions of Immigration. Political Studies57 (2): 337–355.
32.
HerringMJankowskiTBBrownRE (2005) Pro-Black Doesn’t Mean Anti-White: The Structure of African-American Group Identity. The Journal of Politics61 (2): 363–386.
33.
HeywoodA (2007) Political Ideologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
HoogheMReeskensTStolleD (2007) Diversity, Multiculturalism and Social Cohesion: Trust and Ethnocentrism in European Societies. In: BantingKGCourcheneTJSeidleFL (eds) Belonging? Diversity, Recognition and Shared Citizenship in Canada, vol. III. Montreal, QC, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp.387–410.
35.
JensenCThomsenJPF (2011) Can Party Competition Amplify Mass Ideological Polarization over Public Policy? The Case of Ethnic Exclusionism in Denmark and Sweden. Party Politics19 (5): 821–840.
36.
JostJT (2009) Elective Affinities: On the Psychological Bases of Left–Right Differences. Psychological Inquiry20 (2–3): 129–141.
37.
JostJTAmodioDM (2012) Political Ideology as Motivated Social Cognition: Behavioral and Neuroscientific Evidence. Motivation and Emotion36 (1): 55–64.
38.
JostJTGlaserJKruglanskiAW, et al. (2003) Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition. Psychological Bulletin129 (3): 339–375.
39.
JostJTNosekBAGoslingSD (2008) Ideology: Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science3 (2): 126–136.
40.
JungSYKimEMoonS-G (2017) The Influence of Personal Values, Social trust, and Political Trust on Multicultural Acceptance. International Review of Public Administration22 (2): 138–152.
41.
JustwanF (2015) Disenfranchised Minorities: Trust, Definitions of Citizenship, and Noncitizen Voting Rights in Developed Democracies. International Political Science Review36 (4): 373–392.
42.
KamCDFranzeseR (2007) Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
43.
KitscheltH (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
KnutsenO (1998) Europeans Move Towards the Center: A Comparative Longitudinal Study of Left–Right Self-Placement in Western Europe. International Journal of Public Opinion Research10 (4): 292–316.
45.
KramerRM (2017) Ingroup-Outgroup Trust: Barriers, Benefits, and Bridges. In: UslanerEM (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–24.
46.
KundaZ (1990) The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin108 (3): 480–498.
47.
LahavGCourtemancheM (2012) The Ideological Effects of Framing Threat on Immigration and Civil Liberties. Political Behavior34 (3): 477–505.
48.
LakoffG (2002) Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
49.
LeeperTSlothuusR (2014) Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation. Advances in Political Psychology35: 129–156.
50.
LeighA (2006) Trust, Inequality and Ethnic Heterogeneity. The Economic Record82 (258): 268–280.
51.
McLarenLM (2003) Anti-Immigrant Prejudice in Europe: Contact, Threat Perception, and Preferences for the Exclusion of Migrants. Social Forces81 (3): 909–936.
52.
NannestadP (2008) What Have We Learned about Generalized Trust, if Anything?Annual Review of Political Science11: 413–436.
53.
NewtonKStolleDZmerliS (2017) Social and Political Trust. In: UslanerEM (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–24.
54.
NguyenQBernauerT (2018) Does Social Trust Affect Public Support for International Trade? Insights from an Experiment in Vietnam. Political Studies. Epub ahead of print 29 May 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0032321718773560.
55.
PetersenMBAarøeL (2015) Birth Weight and Social Trust in Adulthood: Evidence for Early Calibration of Social Cognition. Psychological Science26 (11): 1681–1692.
56.
PutnamRD (2007) E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies30 (2): 137–174.
57.
ReeskensTHoogheM (2008) Cross-Cultural Measurement Equivalence of Generalized Trust: Evidence from the European Social Survey (2002 and 2004). Social Indicators Research85 (3): 515–532.
58.
RicoGJenningsMK (2016) The Formation of Left–Right Identification: Pathways and Correlates of Parental Influence. Political Psychology37 (2): 1–16.
59.
RochelleRCEricksonBH (2009) Untangling the Roots of Tolerance: How Forms of Social Capital Shape Attitudes Toward Ethnic Minorities and Immigrants. American Behavioral Scientist52 (12): 1664–1689.
60.
RosenbergM (1956) Misanthropy and Political Ideology. American Sociological Review21 (6): 690–695.
61.
RothsteinBUslanerEM (2005) All for All: Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust. World Politics58 (1): 41–72.
62.
RustenbachE (2010) Sources of Negative Attitudes toward Immigrants in Europe: A Multi-Level Analysis. International Migration Review44 (1): 53–77.
63.
ScheepersPGijsbertsMCoendersM (2002) Ethnic Exclusionism in European Countries. Public Opposition to Civil Rights for Legal Migrants as a Response to Perceived Ethnic Threat. European Sociological Review18 (1): 17–34.
64.
SchneiderSL (2008) Anti-Immigrant Attitudes in Europe: Outgroup Size and Perceived Ethnic Threat. European Sociological Review24 (1): 53–67.
65.
SchwartzSHBilskyW (1987) Toward a Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology53 (3): 550–562.
66.
SchwartzSHCieciuchJVecchioneM, et al. (2012) Refining the Theory of Basic Individual Values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology103 (4): 663–688.
67.
SemyonovMRaijmanRGorodzeiskyA (2006) The Rise of Anti-Foreigner Sentiment in European Societies, 1988–2000. American Sociological Review71 (3): 426–449.
68.
SidesJCitrinJ (2007) European Opinion about Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information. British Journal of Political Science37 (3): 477–504.
69.
SnidermanPMHagendoornL (2007) When Ways of Life Collide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70.
StephanWGYbarraOMartnezCM, et al. (1998) Prejudice toward Immigrants to Spain and Israel: An Integrated Threat Analysis. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology29 (4): 559–576.
71.
StolleDHoogheM (2004) The Roots of Social Capital: Attitudinal and Network Mechanisms in the Relation between Youth and Adult Indicators of Social Capital. Acta Politica39 (4): 422–441.
72.
SvendsenGLHSvendsenGT (2015) The Puzzle of the Scandinavian Welfare State and Social Trust. Issues in Social Science3 (2): 90–99.
73.
TaberCSLodgeM (2006) Motivated Scepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 755–769.
74.
TaberCSLodgeMGlatharJ (2001) The Motivated Construction of Political Judgments. In: KuklinskyJH (ed.) Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.198–209.
75.
ThomsenJPFOlsenM (2017) Re-examining Socialization Theory: How Does Democracy Influence the Impact of Education on Anti-Foreigner Sentiment?British Journal of Political Science47 (4): 915–938.
76.
ThorisdottirHJostJTLiviatanI, et al. (2007) Psychological Needs and Values Underlying Left–Right Political Orientations: Cross-National Evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly71 (2): 175–203.
77.
TreierSHillygusDS (2009) The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary Electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly73 (4): 679–703.
78.
UslanerEM (2000) Producing and Consuming Trust. Political Science Quarterly115 (4): 569–590.
79.
UslanerEM (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
UslanerEM (2004) Trust and Social Bonds: Faith in Others and Policy Outcomes Reconsidered. Political Research Quarterly57 (3): 501–507.
81.
UslanerEM (2008) Where You Stand Depends Upon Where Your Grandparents Sat. Public Opinion Quarterly72 (4): 725–740.
82.
UslanerEM (2010) Segregation, Mistrust and Minorities. Ethnicities10 (4): 415–434.
83.
UslanerEM (2011) Trust, Diversity, and Segregation in the United States and the United Kingdom. Comparative Sociology10 (2): 221–247.
84.
UslanerEM (2017) The Study of Trust. In: UslanerEM (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–12.
85.
WelchMRiveraREConwayBP, et al. (2005) Determinants and Consequences of Social Trust. Sociological Inquiry75 (4): 453–473.
86.
YamagishiTFoddyMPlatowMJ (2009) Group-Based Trust in Strangers: The Role of Stereotypes and Expectations. Psychological Science20 (4): 419–422.
87.
YamagishiTSuzukiNKonnoY (2007) In-Group Bias in Trusting Behavior: A Choice of Allocator Experiment with Minimal Groups. The Japanese Journal of Psychology78 (1): 17–24.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
