Britain’s vote to leave the European Union highlights the importance of White majority opposition to immigration. This article presents the results of a survey experiment examining whether priming an open form of ethno-nationalism based on immigrant assimilation reduces hostility to immigration and support for right-wing populism in Britain. Results show that drawing attention to the idea that assimilation leaves the ethnic majority unchanged significantly reduces hostility to immigration and support for Hard Brexit in the UK. Treatment effects are strongest among UK Independence Party, Brexit and White working-class voters. This is arguably the first example of an experimental treatment leading to more liberal immigration policy preferences.
AlbaRD (2005) Bright vs. Blurred Boundaries: Second-Generation Assimilation and Exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies28 (1): 20–49.
2.
BarthF (1998) Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference.Waveland Press.
3.
BraderTValentinoNASuahyE (2008) What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat. American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 959–978.
4.
BretonC (2015) Making National Identity Salient: Impact on Attitudes toward Immigration and Multiculturalism. Canadian Journal of Political Science48 (2): 357–381.
5.
BrubakerR (2006) Nationalist Politics and Everyday Ethnicity in a Transylvanian Town. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
CharnyshVLucasCSinghP (2015) The Ties That Bind. Comparative Political Studies48 (3): 267–300.
7.
CitrinJSidesJ (2008) Immigration and the Imagined Community in Europe and the United States. Political Studies56: 33–56.
8.
CitrinJWrightM (2009) Defining the Circle of We: American Identity and Immigration Policy. The Forum17 (3).
9.
CitrinJReingoldBGreenDP (1990) American Identity and the Politics of Ethnic Change. The Journal of Politics52 (4): 1124–1154.
10.
CitrinJWongCDuffB (2001) The Meaning of American National Identity. In: AshmoreRDJussimLWilderD (eds) Social Identity, Intergroup Conflict, and Conflict Reduction. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.71–100.
11.
ClarkeHDet al. (2017) Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge University Press.
12.
CoendersMTA (2001) Nationalistic Attitudes and Ethnic Exclusionism in a Comparative Perspective: An Empirical Study of Attitudes toward the Country and Ethnic Immigrants in 22 Countries. Nijmegen: Radboud University.
13.
CraigMARichesonJA (2014) More Diverse yet Less Tolerant? How the Increasingly Diverse Racial Landscape Affects White Americans’ Racial Attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin40 (6): 750–761.
14.
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2016) Controlling Migration Fund: Mitigating the Impacts of Immigration on Local Communities. Prospectus, Department for Communities and Local Government, London, November.
15.
DruckmanJNLeeperTJ (2012) Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects. American Journal of Political Science56 (4): 875–896.
DuffyBet al. (2015) Shifting Ground: Changing Attitudes to Immigration in the Long Term and During Election Campaigns. IMSR Institute. London: Ipsos MORI.
FeldmanSStennerK (1997) Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism. Political Psychology18 (4): 741–770.
20.
FoxJE (2014) National Holiday Commemorations: The View from below. In: TsangRWoodsE (eds) The Cultural Politics of Nationalism and Nation-Building. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp.38–52.
21.
FrancisEK (1976) Interethnic Relations: An Essay in Sociological Theory. New York: Elsevier Scientific.
22.
GoodhartD (2013) The British Dream: Successes and Failures of Post-War Immigration. London: Atlantic Books.
23.
GordonM (1964) Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJ (2014) Public Attitudes toward Immigration. Annual Review of Political Science17: 225–249.
25.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJ (2015) The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes Toward Immigrants. American Journal of Political Science59 (3): 529–548.
26.
HeathAFTilleyJR (2005) National Identity and Attitudes towards Migrants: Findings from the ISSP. International Journal on Multicultural Societies7 (2): 119–132.
27.
HighamJ (1955) Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860–1925. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
28.
HopkinsDJSidesJCitrinJ (2016) The Muted Consequences of Correct Information about Immigration, 18June. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2798622 (accessed 18 February 2017).
29.
HutchinsonJ (2005) Nations as Zones of Conflict. London: SAGE.
30.
InglehartRNorrisP (2016) Trump, Brexit, and the rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. HKS Working Paper No. RWP16-026. Harvard Kennedy School.
31.
JardinaA (2014) Demise of Dominance: Group Threat and the New Relevance of White Identity for American Politics. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
32.
KaufmannE (2004) Dominant ethnicity: from Background to foreground. In: KaufmannE (ed.) Rethinking Ethnicity: Majority Groups and Dominant Minorities. London: Routledge, pp.1–14.
33.
KaufmannE (2016) Complexity and Nationalism. Nations and Nationalism23 (1): 6–25.
34.
LawrenceEDSidesJ (2014) The Consequences of Political Innumeracy. Research & Politics. Epub ahead of print 13August. DOI: 10.1177/2053168014545414.
35.
LoomisJBWhiteDS (1996) Economic Benefits of Rare and Endangered Species: Summary and Meta-Analysis. Ecological Economics18 (3): 197–206.
36.
LouisWREssesVMLalondeRN (2013) National Identification. Perceived Threat, and Dehumanization as Antecedents of Negative Attitudes toward Immigrants in Australia and Canada. Journal of Applied Social Psychology43 (S2): E156–E165.
37.
MajorBBlodornABlascovichGM (2016) The Threat of Increasing Diversity: Why Many White Americans Support Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Epub ahead of print 20October. DOI: 10.1177/1368430216677304.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
NatCen Social Research (2016) British Social Attitudes Survey, 2014 (Data collection). 2nd edn. UK Data Service. SN: 7809. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7809-2 (accessed 18 January 2017).
41.
ParkACurticeJBrysonC (eds) (2014) British Social Attitudes: The 31st Report. London: NatCen Social Research. Available at: http://bsa-31.natcen.ac.uk/ (accessed 18 January 2017).
42.
PehrsonSVignolesVLBrownR (2009) National Identification and Anti-Immigrant Prejudice: Individual and Contextual Effects of National Definitions. Social Psychology Quarterly72 (1): 24–38.
43.
PerezEOHetheringtonMJ (2014) Authoritarianism in Black and White: Testing the Cross-Racial Validity of the Child Rearing Scale. Political Analysis22 (3): 398–412.
RoseC (2011) What Makes People Tick: The Three Hidden Worlds of Settlers, Prospectors and Pioneers. Leicester: Matador.
46.
SchildkrautDJ (2014) Boundaries of American Identity: Evolving Understandings of ‘Us’. Annual Review of Political Science17: 441–460.
47.
SmithAD (1991) National Identity. London: Penguin Books.
48.
SmithRM (1997) Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
SnidermanPMHagendoorNPriorM (2004) Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities. American Political Science Review98 (1): 35–49.
50.
StennerK (2005) The Authoritarian Dynamic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
WimmerA (2007) The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: Toward a Comparative Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Comparative Research.
52.
WongC (2010) Boundaries of Obligation in American Politics: Geographic, National, and Racial Communities. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
WrightMCitrinJ (2010) Saved by the Stars and Stripes? Images of Protest, Salience of Threat, and Immigration Attitudes. American Politics Research39: 323–343.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
