The extant literature views the decision to protect women’s economic rights as made by firms and neglects the role of the state. This study argues that states are pressured to improve the protection of these rights by enacting gender parity–promoting policies in response to similar policy choices by their economic competitors, resulting in a specific type of policy interdependence—the upward policy convergence. Additionally, this convergence should be stronger in laws than in practices because some states continue to benefit from women-suppressing policies, and because improving laws is less costly than improving policy implementation. Using newly coded global data from 1999 to 2009 on women’s economic rights that distinguish between laws and practices, spatial econometrical analyses support these conjectures. Essentially, this study shows that the race to the bottom is not the sole consequence of globalization, a climb to the top is possible as well when we look closer and more carefully. In other words, trade and capital dependence can generate positive policy gains too.
AchenCH (2005) Let’s Put Garbage-Can Regressions and Garbage-Can Probits Where They Belong. Conflict Management and Peace Science22 (4): 327–339.
2.
AckerJ (2004) Gender, Capitalism and Globalization. Critical Sociology30 (1): 17–41.
3.
AhmedFZ (2016) Does Foreign Aid Harm Political Rights? Evidence from US Aid. Quarterly Journal of Political Science11 (2): 183–217.
4.
AhmedNBukhariSKH (2006) Gender Inequality and Trade Liberalization: A Case Study of Pakistan. MPRA Paper 16252. University Library of Munich, Munich.
5.
AkchurinMLeeC-S (2013) Pathways to Empowerment: Repertoires of Women’s Activism and Gender Earnings Equality. American Sociological Review78 (4): 679–701.
6.
BacciniLKoenig-ArchibugiM (2014) Why Do States Commit to International Labour Standards? The importance of “Rivalry” and “Friendship.”World Politics66 (3): 446–490.
7.
BeckerGS (1957) The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
BellSRCingranelliDMurdieAet al (2013) Coercion, Capacity, and Coordination: Predictors of Political Violence. Conflict Management and Peace Science30 (3): 240–262.
9.
BerikG (2011) Gender Aspects of Trade. In: JansenMPetersRXirinachsJMS (eds) Trade and Employment: From Myths to Facts. Geneva: International Labour Organization, pp.237–254.
10.
BerikGRodgersYZveglichJE (2004) International Trade and Gender Wage Discrimination: Evidence from East Asia. Review of Development Economics8 (2): 237–254.
11.
BhagwatiJ (2004) In Defense of Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
BlackSEBrainerdE (2002) Importing Equality? The Impact of Globalization on Gender Discrimination. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 9110.
13.
BlantonRGBlantonSL (2015) Is Foreign Direct Investment “Gender Blind”? Women’s Rights as a Determinant of US FDI. Feminist Economics1: 28.
14.
BleckerRASeguinoS (2002) Macroeconomic Effects of Reducing Gender Wage Inequality in an Export-Oriented, Semi-Industrialized Economy. Review of Development Economics6 (1): 103–119.
15.
BusseMSpielmannC (2006) Gender Inequality and Trade. Review of International Economics14 (3): 362–379.
16.
BütheTMilnerHV (2008) The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agreements?American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 741–762.
17.
CaoX (2010) Networks as Channels of Policy Diffusion: Explaining Worldwide Changes in Capital Taxation, 1998–2006. International Studies Quarterly54 (3): 823–854.
18.
CavalcantiTTavaresJ (2016) The Output Cost of Gender Discrimination: A Model-Based Macroeconomic Estimate. The Economic Journal126 (590): 109–134.
19.
ChenZGeYLaiHet al (2013) Globalization and Gender Wage Inequality in China. World Development44: 256–266.
20.
ChoS-Y (2013) Integrating Equality: Globalization, Women’s Rights, and Human Trafficking. International Studies Quarterly57 (4): 683–697.
21.
CingranelliDLRichardsDL (2010) The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Dataset 2010. Available at: http://www.humanrightsdata.org
22.
ColeWM (2005) Sovereignty Relinquished? Explaining Commitment to the International Human Rights Covenants, 1966–1999. American Sociological Review70 (3): 472–495.
23.
ColeWM (2013a) Government Respect for Gendered Rights: The Effect of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on Women’s Rights Outcomes, 1981–2004. International Studies Quarterly57 (2): 233–249.
24.
ColeWM (2013b) Strong Walk and Cheap Talk: The Effect of the International Covenant of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights on Policies and Practices. Social Forces92 (1): 165–194.
25.
ColeWM (2015) Mind the Gap: State Capacity and the Implementation of Human Rights Treaties. International Organization69: 405–441.
26.
DaviesRBVadlamannatiKC (2013) A Race To the Bottom In Labor Standards? An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Development Economics103 (0): 1–14.
27.
DellM (2005) Widening the Border: The Impact of NAFTA on Female Labor Force Participation in Mexico. IZA Working Paper.
28.
DeoN (2006) Is Globalization Our Friend? Women’s Allies in the Developing World. Current History105 (689): 105–111.
29.
DruryACPeksenD (2014) Women and Economic Statecraft: The Negative Impact International Economic Sanctions Visit on Women. European Journal of International Relations20 (2): 463–490.
30.
DufloE (2012) Women Empowerment and Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature50 (4): 1051–1079.
31.
EderingtonJMinierJTroskeKR (2009) Where The Girls Are: Trade and Labor Market Segregation in Colombia. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4131.
32.
ElkinsZGuzmanATSimmonsBA (2006) Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000. International Organization60 (04): 811–846.
33.
EnglehartNA (2009) State Capacity, State Failure, and Human Rights. Journal of Peace Research46 (2): 163–180.
34.
FarissCJ (2014) Respect for Human Rights has Improved Over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability. American Political Science Review108 (2): 297–318.
35.
FontanaM (2007) Modelling the Effects of Trade on Women, at Work and at Home: Comparative Perspectives. In: Van SteverenDEIGrownCCagatayN (eds) The Feminist Economics of Trade. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.117–140.
36.
FranzeseRJHaysJC (2007) Spatial Econometric Models of Cross-Sectional Interdependence in Political Science Panel and Time-Series-Cross-Section Data. Political Analysis15 (2): 140–164.
37.
FranzeseRJJrHaysJC (2008) Contagion, Common Exposure, and Selection: Empirical Modeling of the Theories and Substance of Interdependence in Political Science. IPSA Concepts & Methods Newsletter 4 (2): 2–8.
38.
FranzeseRJJrHaysJCCookSJ (2016) Spatial- and Spatiotemporal-Autoregressive Probit Models of Interdependent Binary Outcomes. Political Science Research and Methods4 (01): 151–173.
39.
FussellE (2000) Making Labor Flexible: The Recomposition of Tijuana’s Maquiladora Female Labor Force. Feminist Economics6 (3): 59–79.
GleditschNPWallensteenPErikssonMet al (2002) Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615–637.
43.
GoldinC (2006) The Quiet Revolution that Transformed Women’s Employment, Education, and Family. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 11953.
44.
GoldsteinJLRiversDTomzM (2007) Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade. International Organization61 (01): 37–67.
45.
GoodliffeJHawkinsDG (2006) Explaining Commitment: States and the Convention against Torture. Journal of Politics68 (2): 358–371.
46.
GrahamERShipanCRVoldenC (2013) The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science. British Journal of Political Science43 (03): 673–701.
47.
GrayMMKittilsonMCSandholtzW (2006) Women and Globalization: A Study of 180 Countries, 1975–2000. International Organization60 (2): 293–333.
48.
GreenhillBMosleyLPrakashA (2009) Trade-based Diffusion of Labor Rights: A Panel Study, 1986–2002. The American Political Science Review103 (4): 669–690.
49.
Hafner-BurtonE (2009) Forced to Be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
50.
Hafner-BurtonEMTsutsuiK (2005) Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises. American Journal of Sociology110 (5): 1373–1411.
51.
IDRC (2013) Growth and Economic Opportunities for Women: Literature Review to Inform the DFID-IDRC-Hewlett Foundation Research Program on Women’s Economic Empowerment, Gender Equality and Growth in Low Income Countries. Canada: Equal Footing.
52.
KabeerNMahmudS (2004) Globalization, Gender and Poverty: Bangladeshi Women Workers in Export and Local Markets. Journal of International Development16 (1): 93–109.
53.
KabeerNNataliL (2013) Gender Equality and Economic Growth: Is There a Win-Win?IDS Working Papers2013 (417): 1–58.
54.
KingGRobertsME (2015) How Robust Standard Errors Expose Methodological Problems They Do Not Fix, and What to Do about It. Political Analysis23 (2): 79–159.
55.
KlasenS (2006) Pro-Poor Growth and Gender Inequality. In: Ibero America Institute for Econ. Research (IAI) Discussion Papers 151: Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.
56.
KoniskyDM (2007) Regulatory Competition and Environmental Enforcement: Is There a Race to the Bottom?American Journal of Political Science51 (4): 853–872.
57.
LeeCKStrangD (2006) The International Diffusion of Public-Sector Downsizing: Network Emulation and Theory-Driven Learning. International Organization60 (04): 883–909.
58.
LiQResnickA (2003) Reversal of Fortunes: Democratic Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to Developing Countries. International Organization57 (01): 175–211.
MarshallMGJaggersK (2012) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2012: Dataset Users’ Manual. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
61.
MayerJ (2009) Policy Space: What, for What, and Where?Development Policy Review27 (4): 373–395.
62.
MenonNRodgersY (2009) International Trade and the Gender Wage Gap: New Evidence from India’s Manufacturing Sector. World Development37 (5): 965–981.
63.
MosleyL (2011) Labor Rights and Multinational Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
MunshiKRosenzweigM (2006) Traditional Institutions Meet the Modern World: Caste, Gender, and Schooling Choice in a Globalizing Economy. American Economic Review96 (4): 1225–1252.
65.
NeumayerEPlümperT (2012) Conditional Spatial Policy Dependence: Theory and Model Specification. Comparative Political Studies45 (7): 819–849.
66.
NeumayerEde SoysaI (2006) Globalization and the Right to Free Association and Collective Bargaining: An Empirical Analysis. World Development34 (1): 31–49.
67.
NeumayerEde SoysaI (2011) Globalization and the Empowerment of Women: An Analysis of Spatial Dependence via Trade and Foreign Direct Investment. World Development39 (7): 1065–1075.
68.
OlneyWW (2013) A Race to the Bottom? Employment Protection and Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of International Economics91 (2): 191–203.
69.
PeksenD (2009) Better or Worse? The Effect of Economic Sanctions on Human Rights. Journal of Peace Research46 (1): 59–77.
70.
PoeSCWendel-BluntDHoK (1997) Global Patterns in the Achievement of Women’s Human Rights to Equality. Human Rights Quarterly19 (4): 813–835.
71.
PortaLRafaelFLShleiferAet al (1999) The Quality of Government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization15 (1): 222–279.
72.
PotrafkeN (2015) The Evidence on Globalisation. The World Economy38 (3): 509–552.
73.
PotrafkeNUrsprungHW (2012) Globalization and Gender Equality in the Course of Development. European Journal of Political Economy28 (4): 399–413.
74.
RichardsDGellenyRD (2007) Women’s Status and Economic Globalization. International Studies Quarterly51 (4): 855–876.
75.
RichardsDLGellenyRDSackoDH (2001) Money with a Mean Streak? Foreign Economic Penetration and Government Respect for Human Rights in Developing Countries. International Studies Quarterly45 (2): 219–239.
76.
SailerLD (1978) Structural Equivalence: Meaning and Definition, Computation and Application. Social Networks1 (1): 73–90.
77.
SchoberTWinter-EbmerR (2011) Gender Wage Inequality and Economic Growth: Is There Really a Puzzle?—A Comment. World Development39 (8): 1476–1484.
78.
SchulerM (1995) From Basic Needs to Basic Rights: Women’s Claim to Human Rights. Washington, DC: Institute for Women, Law and Development.
79.
SeguinoS (2005) Gender Inequality in A Globalizing World. In Gender Equality: Striving for Justice in an Unequal World. New York: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
80.
SeguinoS (2000) Gender Inequality and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Analysis. World Development28 (7): 1211–1230.
81.
SethuramanSV (1998) Gender, Informality and Poverty: A Global Review. Report for the World Bank Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Department. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
82.
SimmonsB (2009) Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
83.
SimmonsBAElkinsZ (2004) The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. American Political Science Review98 (01): 171–189.
84.
SimmonsBADobbinFGarrettG (2006) Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization60 (04): 781–810.
85.
StandingG (1989) Global Feminization through Flexible Labor. World Development17 (7): 1077–1095.
86.
StandingG (1999) Global Feminization Through Flexible Labor: A Theme Revisited. World Development27 (3): 583–602.
WangZ (2016) Institutionalized Autocracies, Policy Interdependence, and Labor Rights. Journal of Human Rights1: 21.
90.
WardKRahmanFIslamAKMet al (2004) The Effects of Global Economic Restructuring on Urban Women’s Work and Income-Generating Strategies in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Critical Sociology30 (1): 63–102.
91.
WelchF (2000) Growth in Women’s Relative Wages and in Inequality among Men: One Phenomenon or Two?The American Economic Review90 (2): 444–449.
92.
WilliamsM (2000) Some Preliminary Remarks on Gender Analysis of Trade and Investment: Issues in the Context of Mobilizing International Resources for Development. In: Financing for Development: NGO Hearing Week. New York: United Nations.
93.
World Bank (2011) Women, Business and the Law 2012, Removing Barriers to Economic Inclusion. Washington, DC: World Bank.
94.
World Bank (2012) World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
