Private-heavy welfare systems, in which low or moderate state benefits are topped up by private welfare arrangements, are expected to undermine political support for the extension of social rights and perpetuate benefit fragmentation over time. And where low state benefits are means tested, political support is expected to be particularly prone to erosion. In this article I develop the argument that the combination of private pensions and means-testing does not always perpetuate fragmentation. Rather, it structures the policy preferences of pension industry representatives and right-of-centre parties such that these actors push for reforms to make the state pension more universal. I make my argument by examining the reform history of nine private-heavy pension systems in the three decades since 1980. A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis maps the conditions under which universalizing reforms have occurred, and two case studies link institutional conditions to reform outcomes via the policy preferences of key political actors.
Berg-SchlosserDDe MeurGRihouxBet al. (2009) Qualitative Comparative Analysis as an Approach. In: RaginCCRihouxB (eds) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp.1–18.
2.
Business Council of Australia (2001) Pre-Budget Submission to the Treasurer. Melbourne, BCA.
3.
CastleBTownsendP (1996) We Can Afford the Welfare State. London: Security in Retirement for Everyone.
4.
CastlesFGMitchellD (1993) Worlds of Welfare and Families of Nations. In: CastlesFG (ed.) Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company, pp.93–128.
5.
ChomikRPiggottJWoodlandADet al. (2015) Means Testing Social Security: Modeling and Policy Analysis. Working Paper 2016-337. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Retirement Research Centre (MRRC).
6.
Commonwealth Treasury of Australia (2001) Towards Higher Retirement Incomes for Australians: A History of the Australian Retirement Income System since Federation (Economic Roundup, Centenary Edition). Available at: https://archive.treasury.gov.au/documents/110/PDF/round4.pdf (accessed 20 September 2017).
CostelloP (2000) Budget Speech 2000–01, Delivered on 9 May 2000 on the Second Reading of the Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2000–01 by the Honourable Peter Costello, MP Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: http://www.budget.gov.au/2000-01/speech/html/speech.htm
9.
CostelloP (2006) Budget Speech 2006–07, Delivered on 9 May 2000 on the Second Reading of the Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2000–01: By the Honourable Peter Costello, MP Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: http://www.budget.gov.au/2006-07/speech/html/Speech.htm (accessed 20 September 2017).
10.
CukiermanATommasiM (1998) When Does It Take a Nixon to Go to China?American Economic Review88 (1): 180–197.
11.
DisneyR (2016) Pension Reform in the United Kingdom: An Economic Perspective. National Institute Economic Review237: 6–12.
12.
DöringHSchwanderH (2015) Revisiting the Left Cabinet Share: How to Measure the Partisan Profile of Governments in Welfare State Research. Journal of European Social Policy25 (2): 175–193.
13.
DriverS (2002) Frank Field’s Fifteen Minutes. In: DeaconA (ed.) Debating Pensions: Self-interest, Citizenship and the Common Good. London: Civitas, pp.94–105.
14.
EmmeneggerPHäusermannSPalierBet al. (eds) (2012) The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Esping-Andersen (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
FrithB (2001) Targeted Stimulation – The New Caring Sharing Coalition. The Australian, 23May.
17.
GingrichJHäusermannS (2015) The Decline of the Working-class Vote, the Reconfiguration of the Welfare Support Coalition and Consequences for the Welfare State. Journal of European Social Policy25 (1): 50–75.
18.
GootMWatsonI (2007) Explaining Howard’s Success: Social Structures, Issue Agendas and Party Support, 1993–2004. Australian Journal of Political Science42 (2): 253–276.
19.
Green-PedersenC (2001) Welfare State Retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands, 1982–1998: The Role of Party Competition and Party Consensus. Comparative Political Studies34 (9): 963–985.
20.
Green-PedersenC (2003) Still There but for How Long? The Counter-Intuitiveness of the Universal Welfare Model and the Development of the Universal Welfare State in Denmark. Revue Francaise Des Affaires Sociales4 (4): 105–120.
HuberEStephensJD (2001) Development and Crisis of Welfare States: Parties and Politics in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
26.
JensenC (2015) The Power of Talk and the Welfare State: Evidence from 23 Countries on an Asymmetric Opposition-government Response Mechanism. Socioeconomic Review13 (2): 215–233.
27.
KavanaghJ (1996) Industry Fired up over Social Security Tests. The Australian, 13November.
28.
KellyP (2001) Atoning for the GST Sin – Budget 2001. The Australian, 23May.
29.
KeskinenSNorocelOCJørgensenMB (2016) The Politics and Policies of Welfare Chauvinism under the Economic Crisis. Critical Social Policy36 (3): 321–329.
30.
KorpiWPalmeJ (1998) The Paradox of Distribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in the Western Countries. American Sociological Review63 (5): 661–687.
31.
KorpiWPalmeJ (2003) New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review97 (3): 425–446.
32.
KudrnaG (2016a) Australia’s Retirement Income Policy: Means Testing and Taxation of Pensions. CESifo DICE Report14 (1): 3–9.
33.
KudrnaG (2016b) Economy-wide Effects of Means-tested Pension: The Case of Australia. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing7: 17–29.
34.
KudrnaGWoodlandAD (2013) Macroeconomic and Welfare Effects of the 2010 Changes to Mandatory Superannuation. Economic Record89 (287): 445–468.
LynchJ (2006) Age and the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
McAllisterI (1996) The End of a Labor Era in Australian Politics. Government and Opposition31 (3): 288–303.
38.
MegalogenisG (1999) Half-baked Super. The Australian, 20November.
39.
MoeneKOWallersteinM (2001) Inequality, Social Insurance and Redistribution. American Political Science Review95 (4): 859–874.
40.
MylesJPiersonP (2001) The Comparative Political Economy of Pension Reform. In: PiersonP (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.305–333.
41.
NeglineT (2007) Super Reforms Easier on Assets. The Australian, 7March.
42.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013a) Factbook. Paris: OECD.
43.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013b) Pensions at a Glance. Paris: OECD.
44.
Oude-NijhuisD (2009) Revisiting the Role of Labour: Worker Solidarity, Employer Opposition, and the Development of Old-Age Penisions in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. World Politics61 (2): 296–392.
45.
PalierB (2010) The Long Conservative Corporatist Road to Welfare Reforms. In: PalierB (ed.) A Long Goodbye to Bismark? The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp.333–388.
PembertonH (2010) ‘What Matters Is What Works’: Labour’s Journey from ‘National Superannuation’ to ‘Personal Accounts’. British Politics5 (1): 41–64.
48.
Pensions Commission (2005a) A New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-First Century: Appendix B – Report on the Pensions Commission Consultation. London: The Stationery Office.
49.
Pensions Commission (2005b) A New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-First Century: The Second Report of the Pensions Commission. London: The Stationery Office.
50.
PiersonP (1996) The New Politics of the Welfare State. World Politics48 (2): 143–179.
51.
PowerJ (1988) Opposition Decides to Keep Modified Assets Test for Aged. The Australian Financial Review, 21September.
52.
RaginCC (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
53.
RaginCC (2000) Fuzzy-set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
RossF (2000) Beyond Left and Right: The New Partisan Politics of Welfare. Governance2: 155–183.
56.
RothsteinB (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
RyanS (2006) Treasurer Has Recast Himself as Superhero. The Australian, 12May.
58.
SchneiderCQWagemannC (2012) Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
SchulzeIMoranM (2006a) Ireland: Pensioning the ‘Celtic Tiger’. In: ImmergutEMAndersonKMSchulzeI (eds) The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.758–804.
60.
SchulzeIMoranM (2006b) United Kingdom: Partisan Politics in an Adversarial System. In: ImmergutEMAndersonKMSchulzeI (eds) The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.49–97.
61.
SchumacherGVan KersbergenK (2014) Do Mainstream Parties Adapt to the Welfare Chauvinism of Populist Parties?Party Politics22 (3): 300–312.
62.
ScruggsL (2004) Summary Dataset: Welfare State Entitlements: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Eighteen Welfare States, Version 1.1.
63.
ScruggsLAllanJP (2004) Political Partsanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science48 (3): 496–512.
64.
SkypalaP (2002) Call to Lift Retirement Age and State Pension Rate. Financial Times, 8October.
65.
SmithP (1998) New Focus on Savings/Mouthing off. The Australian, 30July.
66.
SteketeeM (2001) No Room for Subtlety When There Are Votes to Be Bought – Budget 2001 Analysis. The Australian, 23May.
67.
TannerL (2006) Santa Claus Budget Fails to Deliver for the Future. The Australian, 22May.
68.
TepeMVanhuysseP (2010) Elderly Bias, New Social Risks, and Social Spending: Change and Timing in Eight Programs across Four Worlds of Welfare, 1980–2003. Journal of European Social Policy20 (3): 217–234.
69.
The Australian Financial Review (1989) Saving Australia. The Australian Financial Review, 11January.
70.
TimminsN (2003) Call for Changes to State Pension System. Financial Times, 17March.
71.
TimminsN (2004a) Debate Focuses on Barriers to Saving. Financial Times, 30September.
72.
TimminsN (2004b) Minister Rejects CBI Call to Raise State Pension Age to 70. Financial Times, 20July.
73.
TimminsNEagleshamJ (2002) Scrapping of Second State Pension Ruled Out. Financial Times, 20June.
74.
TimminsNNewmanC (2003) Duncan Smith Urged to Restore State Pension Link with Earnings That Was Severed by Thatcher. Financial Times, 18June.
75.
TimminsNTurnerD (2003) Aim of Scrapping Second State Pension Endorsed. Financial Times, 7October.
76.
VanhuyssePGoerresA (2012) Mapping the Field: Comparative Generational Politics and Policies in Ageing Democracies. In: VanhuyssePGoerresA (eds) Ageing Populations in Post-industrial Democracies: Comparative Studies of Policies and Politics. New York: Routledge, pp.1–22.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
