Does a country’s abuse of human rights influence its ability to get a loan from the International Monetary Fund? We examine whether human rights conditions matter for the likelihood that a country participates in an International Monetary Fund program. We argue that human rights conditions are unlikely to be enough by themselves to influence International Monetary Fund decision-making; there are simply too many countries with poor human rights conditions that are under economic distress. Instead, it is the publicity and information that human rights organizations provide about countries that reduce the likelihood of International Monetary Fund program participation. We test the implications of this reasoning in a global analysis from 1990 to 2009 using an accepted model of International Monetary Fund program participation. We find much support for our hypothesis. We further demonstrate that it is those countries closer to the United States that are most likely to have human rights organization information reduce their likelihood of International Monetary Fund program participation.
AusderanJ (2014) How Naming and Shaming Affects Human Rights Perceptions in the Shamed Country. Journal of Peace Research51 (1): 81–95.
4.
BaileyMStrezhnevAVoetenE (2015) Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from UN Voting Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution. Epub ahead of print 17August. DOI: 10.1177/0022002715595700.
5.
BarryCMClayKCFlynnME (2013) Avoiding the Spotlight: Human Rights Shaming and Foreign Direct Investment. International Studies Quarterly57 (3): 532–544.
6.
BeckerJ (2012) Campaigning for Justice: Human Rights Advocacy in Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
BlantonSL (2000) Promoting Human Rights and Democracy in the Developing World: US Rhetoric versus US Arms Exports. American Journal of Political Science44 (1): 123–131.
8.
BondDBondJOhCet al. (2003) Integrated Data for Events Analysis (IDEA): An Event Typology for Automated Events Data Development. Journal of Peace Research40 (6): 733–745.
DavisDRMurdieASteinmetzCG (2012) “ Makers and Shapers”: Human Rights INGOs and Public Opinion. Human Rights Quarterly34 (1): 199–224.
11.
De SoysaIVadlammanatiKC (2013) Do Pro-Market Economic Reforms Drive Human Rights Violations? An Empirical Assessment, 1981–2006. Public Choice155 (1): 163–187.
12.
DreherA (2006a) Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a New Index of Globalization. Applied Economics38 (10): 1091–1110.
13.
DreherA (2006b) IMF Economic Growth: The Effects of Programs, Loans, and Compliance with Conditionality. World Development34 (5): 769–788.
14.
DreherASturmJ-EVreelandJR (2009) Global Horse Trading: IMF Loans for Votes in the United Nations Security Council. European Economic Review53 (7): 742–757.
15.
EriksenSDe SoysaI (2009) A Fate Worse than Debt? International Financial Institutions and Human Rights, 1981–2003. Journal of Peace Research46 (4): 485–503.
16.
FailsMWooB (2015) Unpacking Autocracy: Political Regimes and IMF Program Participation. International Interactions41 (1): 110–132.
17.
FarissCJ (2014) Respect for Human Rights Has Improved over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability. American Political Science Review108 (2): 297–318.
18.
FranklinJ (1997) IMF Conditionality, Threat Perception, and Political Repression: A Cross-National Analysis. Comparative Political Studies30 (5): 576–606.
19.
GoldsteinJS (1992) A Conflict-Cooperation Scale for WEIS Events Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution36 (2): 369–385.
20.
GouldER (2006) Money Talks: The International Monetary Fund, Conditionality, and Supplementary Financiers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
GreenW (2008) Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
IMF (2005a) Minutes of Executive Board Meeting 05/39-2. EBM/05/39-2. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
24.
IMF (2005b) Statement by Mr. Meissner and Mr. Fabig on Sudan (Preliminary) Executive Board Meeting 05/39. GRAY/05/1327. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
25.
IMF (2005c) Sudan—Staff Report for the 2005 Article IV Consultation, Final Review of the 2004 Staff-Monitored Program, and the 2005 Staff-Monitored Program. EBS/05/64. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
26.
IMF (2009) Minutes of Executive Board Meeting 09/6-2. EBM/09/6-2. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
27.
KeckMESikkinkK (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
LavelleKC (2011) Legislating International Organization: The US Congress, the IMF, and the World Bank. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
McEntireKJLeibyMKrainM (2015) Human Rights Organizations as Agents of Change: An Experimental Examination of Framing and Micromobilization. American Political Science Review109 (3): 407–426.
30.
MoserCSturmJ-E (2011) Explaining IMF Lending Decisions after the Cold War. The Review of International Organizations6 (3–4): 307–340.
31.
MurdieAMDavisDR (2012) Shaming and Blaming: Using Events Data to Assess the Impact of Human Rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly56 (1): 1–16.
32.
MurdieAMPeksenD (2013) The Impact of Human Rights INGO Activities on Economic Sanctions. The Review of International Organizations8 (1): 33–53.
33.
MurdieAMPeksenD (2014) The Impact of Human Rights INGO Shaming on Humanitarian Interventions. The Journal of Politics76 (1): 215–228.
34.
MurdieAMUrpelainenJ (2015) Why Pick on Us? Environmental INGOs and State Shaming as a Strategic Substitute. Political Studies63 (2): 353–372.
35.
NielsenRA (2013) Rewarding Human Rights? Selective Aid Sanctions against Repressive States. International Studies Quarterly57 (4): 791–803.
36.
NooruddinISimmonsJW (2006) The Politics of Hard Choices: IMF Programs and Government Spending. International Organization60 (4): 1001–1033.
37.
NooruddinIWooB (2015) Heeding the Sirens: The Politics of IMF Program Participation. Political Science Research and Methods3 (1): 73–93.
38.
OatleyTYackeeJ (2004) American Interests and IMF Lending. International Politics41 (3): 415–429.
39.
Pop-ElechesG (2009) Public Goods or Political Pandering: Evidence from IMF Programs in Latin America and Eastern Europe. International Studies Quarterly53 (3): 787–816.
40.
RisseTRoppSCSikkinkK (eds) (1999) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
RisseTRoppSCSikkinkK (eds) (2013) The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
RonJRamosHRodgersK (2005) Transnational Information Politics: NGO Human Rights Reporting, 1986–2000. International Studies Quarterly49 (3): 557–588.
Sri Lanka (2009) Letter of Intent, Memorandum of Economic and Financial Policies, and Technical Memorandum of Understanding. Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/np/loi/2009/lka/071609.pdf (accessed 20 December 2014).
46.
StoneRW (2004) The Political Economy of IMF Lending in Africa. American Political Science Review98 (4): 577–591.
VoetenE (2013) Data and Analyses of Voting in the UN General Assembly. In: ReinaldaB (ed.) Routledge Handbook of International Organization. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2111149 (accessed 20 December 2014).
52.
VreelandJR (2003) The IMF and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
VreelandJR (2007) The International Monetary Fund: Politics of Conditional Lending. New York: Routledge.
54.
VreelandJRDreherA (2014) The Political Economy of the United Nations Security Council: Money and Influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
