This article assesses the roles of anxiety and anger in shaping people’s perceptions of politicians’ integrity. Drawing on recent work on the role of affect in shaping political judgement, the article develops a theoretical model of the anticipated role of anger and anxiety in structuring reactions to allegations of political misconduct. The model is tested on a unique data set that includes results of an experiment fielded as part of a survey carried out in January 2013 among a representative sample of the French adult population. The analysis finds that those in whom politically dubious actions generate anxiety are more sensitive to contextual details than other respondents, although the role of anger in modulating ethical judgements is less clear-cut, dampening attention to information about negatively assessed behaviour but enhancing attention to information about behaviour that is assessed more positively.
AdutA (2004) Scandal as norm entrepreneurship strategy: Corruption and the French investigating magistrates. Theory and Society33 (5): 529–578.
2.
AllenNBirchS (2011) Political Conduct and Misconduct: Probing Public Opinion. Parliamentary Affairs64 (1): 61–81.
3.
AllenNBirchS (2012) On Either Side of a Moat? Elite and Mass Attitudes towards Right and Wrong. European Journal of Political Research51 (1): 89–116.
4.
AllenNBirchS (2015) Ethics and Integrity in British Politics: How Citizens Judge Their Politicians’ Conduct and Why It Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ArceneauxK (2012) Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments. American Journal of Political Science56 (2): 271–285.
6.
BarenbaumHFujitaFPfennigJ (1995) Consistency, Specificity, and Correlates of Negative Emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology68 (2): 342–352.
7.
BellucciP (2014) The Political Consequences of Blame Attribution for the Economic Crisis in the 2013 Italian National Election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties24 (2): 243–263.
BlaisAGidengilEFournierPet al. (2010) Political Judgments, Perceptions of Facts and Partisan Effects. Electoral Studies29 (2): 1–12.
10.
BodenhausenGVSheppardLAKramerGP (1994) Negative Affect and Social Judgment: The Differential Impact of Anger and Sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology24 (1): 45–62.
11.
BraderT (2011) The Political Relevance of Emotions; ‘Reassessing’ Revisited. Political Psychology32 (2): 337–346.
12.
BraderTValentinoNASuhayE (2008) What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat. American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 959–978.
13.
ChaikenS (1980) Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39 (5): 752–766.
14.
ChalabyJK (2004) Scandal and the Rise of Investigative Reporting in France. American Behavioral Scientist47 (9): 1194–1207.
15.
ChanleyVSullivanJLGonzalezMHet al. (1994) Lust and Avarice in Politics: Damage Control by Four Politicians Accused of Wrongdoing (or Politics as Usual). American Politics Research22 (3): 297–333.
16.
ConoverPFeldmanS (1986) Emotional Reactions to the Economy: I’m Mad as Hell and I’m Not Going to Take It Anymore. American Journal of Political Science30 (1): 50–78.
17.
ConversePEPierceR (1986) Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
DavisCLCampRAColemanKM (2004) The Influence of Party Systems on Citizens’ Perceptions of Corruption and Electoral Response in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies37 (6): 677–703.
19.
DecetyJCacioppoS (2012) The Speed of Morality: A High-Density Electrical Neuroimaging Study. Journal of Neurophysiology108 (11): 3068–3072.
20.
DevinePGSedikidesCFuhrmanRW (1989) Goals in Social Information Processing: The Case of Anticipated Interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology56 (5): 680–690.
21.
FayC (1995) Political Sleaze in France: Forms and Issues. Parliamentary Affairs48 (4): 663–676.
22.
GoldbergJHLernerJSTetlockPE (1999) Rage and Reason: The Psychology of the Intuitive Prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology29 (5-6): 781–795.
23.
GonzalezMHBull KoveraMSullivanJLet al. (1995) Private Reactions to Public Transgressions: Predictors of Evaluative Responses to Allegations of Political Misconduct. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21 (2): 136–147.
24.
GreeneJHaidtJ (2002) How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?Trends in Cognitive Sciences6 (12): 517–523.
25.
GreeneJSommervilleRBNystromLEet al. (2001) An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment. Science293: 2105–2108.
HackerJSRehmPSchlesingerM (2013) The Insecure American: Economic Experiences, Financial Worries and Policy Attitudes. Perspectives on Politics11 (1): 23–49.
29.
HaidtJ (2001) The Emotional Dog and its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review108 (4): 814–834.
30.
HaidtJ (2012) The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. London: Penguin Books.
31.
HeidenheimerAJ (1970) The Context of Analysis: Introduction. In: HeidenheimerAJ (ed.) Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp.3–28.
32.
HuddyLFeldmanSCasseseE (2007) On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger. In: NeumanRMarcusGECriglerANet al. (eds) Affective Intelligence: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, pp.202–230.
33.
JohnstonM (1986) Right and Wrong in American Politics: Popular Conceptions of Corruption. Polity18 (3): 367–391.
34.
KahnemanD (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin Books.
35.
KarpikL (2000) L’avancée de la justice menace-t-elle la République?Le Débat3 (110): 238–257.
36.
KeltnerDEllsworthPCEdwardsK (1993) Beyond Simple Pessimism: Effects of Sadness and Anger on Social Perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64 (5): 740–752.
37.
KuklinskiJHQuirkPJ (2000) Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics, and Mass Opinion. In: LupiaAMcCubbinsMDPopkinSL (eds) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.153–182.
38.
LaddJMLenzGS (2008) Reassessing the Role of Anxiety in Vote Choice. Political Psychology29 (2): 275–296.
LernerJSKeltnerD (2000) Beyond Valence: Toward a Model of Emotion-specific Influences on Judgement and Choice. Cognition and Emotion14 (4): 473–493.
44.
LernerJSKeltnerD (2001) Fear, Anger, and Risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81 (1): 146–159.
45.
LernerJSTiedensLZ (2006) Portrait of The Angry Decision Maker: How Appraisal Tendencies Shape Anger’s Influence on Cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making19 (2): 115–137.
46.
LernerJSGoldbergJHTetlockPE (1998) Sober Second Thought: The Effects of Accountability, Anger and Authoritarianism on Attributions of Responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin24 (6): 563–574.
47.
LernerJSGonzalezRMSmallDAet al. (2003) Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism: A National Field Experiment. Psychological Science14 (2): 144–151.
48.
LiebermanMDSchneiderDOschnerKN (2003) Is Political Cognition like Riding a Bicycle? How Cognitive Neuroscience Can Inform Research on Political Thinking. Political Psychology24 (4): 681–704.
49.
LodgeMTaberC (2000) Three Steps Toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning. In: LupiaAMcCubbinsMDPopkinSL (eds) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.183–213.
50.
LodgeMTaberC (2013) The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
McCurleyCMondakJJ (1995) Inspected by #1184063113: The Influence of Incumbents’ Competence and Integrity in U.S. House Elections. American Journal of Political Science39 (4): 864–885.
52.
MacKuenMWolakJKeeleLet al. (2010) Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation. American Journal of Political Science54 (2): 440–458.
53.
MarcusGE (2002) The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
54.
MarcusGE (2003) The Psychology of Emotion and Politics. In: SearsDOHuddyLJervisR (eds) Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.182–221.
55.
MarcusGEMacKuenMNeumanWR (2011) Parsimony and Complexity: Developing and Testing Theories of Affective Intelligence. Political Psychology32 (2): 323–336.
56.
MarcusGEMacKuenMWolakJet al. (2006) The Measure and Mismeasure of Emotion. In: RedlawskDP (ed.) Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp.31–45.
57.
MarcusGENeumanWRMacKuenM (2000) Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
MastersRD (2001) Cognitive Neuroscience, Emotion and Leadership. In: KuklinskiJH (ed.) Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.68–102.
59.
MastersRDSullivanDG (1989) Nonverbal Displays and Political Leadership in France and the United States. Political Behavior11 (2): 123–156.
60.
MényY (1992) La Corruption de la République. Paris: Fayard.
61.
MényY (1996) Corruption French Style. In: LittleWPosada-CarbóE (eds) Political Corruption in Europe and Latin America. London: Macmillan, pp.159–172.
62.
NadeauRNiemiRGAmatoT (1995) Emotions, Issue Importance and Political Learning. American Journal of Political Science39 (3): 558–574.
63.
NewmanB (2003) Integrity and Presidential Approval, 1980–2000. Public Opinion Quarterly67 (3): 335–367.
PerssonARothsteinBTeorellJ (2013) Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail – Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem. Governance26 (3): 449–471.
68.
PetersJGWelchS (1980) The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review74 (3): 697–708.
69.
PettyRCacioppoJT (1986) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer.
ProthroJWGriggCM (1960) Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement. Journal of Politics22 (2): 276–294.
72.
PujasVRhodesM (1999) Party Finance and Political Scandal in Italy, Spain and France. West European Politics22 (3): 41–63.
73.
RedlawskDP (ed.) (2006) Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
74.
RedlawskDPMcCannJA (2005) Popular Interpretations of Corruption and Their Partisan Consequences. Political Behavior27 (3): 261–284.
75.
RedlawskDPCivettiAJWLauRR (2007) Affective Intelligence and Voting: Information Processing and Learning in a Campaign. In: NeumanRMarcusGECriglerANet al. (eds) Affective Intelligence: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, pp.152–179.
76.
RehmP (2011) Risk Inequality and the Polarized American Electorate. British Journal of Political Science41 (2): 363–387.
77.
RossiPHAndersonAB (1982) The Factorial Survey Approach: An Introduction. In: RossiPNockS (eds) Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverley Hills, CA: SAGE Publishing, pp.15–67.
78.
RuggieroV (1996) France: Corruption as Resentment. Journal of Law and Society23 (1): 113–131.
79.
SearsDO (2001) The Role of Affect in Symbolic Politics. In: KuklinskiJH (ed.) Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.14–40.
80.
ShieldsJG (2006) Political Representation in France: A Crisis of Democracy?Parliamentary Affairs59 (1): 118–137.
81.
SteenbergenMREllisC (2006) Fear and Loathing in American Elections: Context, Traits and Negative Candidate Affect. In: RedlawskDP (ed.) Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.109–133.
82.
TiedensLZLintonS (2001) Judgment Under Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty: The Effects of Specific Emotions on Information Processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81 (6): 973–988.
83.
TillmanER (2016) Has the Global Financial Crisis Changed Citizen Behaviour? A Four-Country Study. In: VowlesJXezonakisG (eds) Globalization and Domestic Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.113–130.
WilliamsPM (1970) Wars, Plots and Scandals in Post-War France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86.
WroeA (2016) Economic Insecurity and Political Trust in the United States. American Politics Research44 (1): 131–163.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
