As political authority shifts to the global level, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) increasingly attempt to influence policy-making within international organisations (IOs). This article examines the nature and sources of non-governmental organisations’ advocacy strategies in global governance. We advance a twofold theoretical argument. First, non-governmental organisation advocacy can be described in terms of inside and outside strategies, similar to interest group lobbying in American and European politics. Second, non-governmental organisations’ chosen combination of inside and outside strategies can be explained by their organisational goals and membership base. Empirically, this argument is corroborated through a large-n analysis of original data from structured interviews with 303 non-governmental organisation representatives active in relation to the United Nations (UN), complemented by 19 semi-structured interviews with UN and state officials. The article’s findings have implications for the theory and practice of non-governmental organisation involvement in global governance.
BaumgartnerFRLeechBL (1998) Basic Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
BetsillMMCorellE (2008) NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
3.
BeyersJ (2004) Voice and Access: Political Practices of European Interest Associations. European Union Politics5: 211–240.
4.
BinderkrantzA (2005) Interest Group Strategies: Navigating between Privileged Access and Strategies of Pressure. Political Studies53: 694–715.
5.
BinderkrantzA (2008) Different Groups, Different Strategies: How Interest Groups Pursue Their Political Ambitions. Scandinavian Political Studies31: 173–200.
6.
BloodgoodE (2010) The Interest Group Analogy: International Non-Governmental Advocacy Organizations in International Politics. Review of International Studies37: 93–120.
7.
BobC (2009) The International Struggle for New Human Rights. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8.
CarpenterRC (2011) Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Systems. International Organization65: 69–102.
9.
CooleyARonJ (2002) The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action. International Security27: 5–39.
10.
Della PortaDTarrowS (eds) (2005) Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
11.
DürAMateoG (2013) Gaining Access or Going Public? Interest Group Strategies in Five European Countries. European Journal of Political Research52: 660–686.
FriedmanEJHochstetlerKClarkAM (2005) Sovereignty, Democracy and Global Civil Society – State-Society Relations at UN World Conferences. New York: State University of New York Press.
14.
GrantW (2000) Pressure Groups and British Politics. London: Macmillan.
15.
GuldbrandsenLAndresenS (2004) NGO Influence in the Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: Compliance, Flexibility Mechanisms, and Sinks. Global Environmental Politics4: 54–75.
16.
GuttmanL (1954) Some Necessary Conditions for Common-Factor Analysis. Psychometrika19: 149–161.
17.
HaddenJ (2015) Networks in Contention: The Divisive Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HanegraaffMBeyersJBraunC (2011) Open the Door to More of the Same? The Development of Interest Group Representation at the WTO. World Trade Review10: 447–472.
19.
HanegraaffMBeyersJDe BruyckerI (2016) Balancing Inside and Outside Lobbying: The Political Strategies of Lobbyists at Global Diplomatic Conferences. European Journal of Political Research55 (3): 568–588.
20.
HansenJM (1991) Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
KeckMESikkinkK (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.
KlineP (1994) An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. New York: Routledge.
24.
KlüverH (2012) Informational Lobbying in the European Union: The Effect of Organisational Characteristics. West European Politics35: 491–510.
25.
KollmanK (1998) Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
KriesiHTreschAJochumM (2007) Going Public in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies40: 48–73.
27.
LowiTJ (1964) American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics16: 667–715.
28.
MartinLL (2000) Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
MartinLLSimmonsBA (2012) International Organizations and Institutions. In: CarlsnaesWRisseTSimmonsBA (eds) Handbook of International Relations. London: SAGE Publishing, pp.326–352.
30.
MitchellGESchmitzH (2014) Principled Instrumentalism: A Theory of Transnational NGO Behavior. Review of International Studies40: 487–504.
31.
O’BrienRGoetzAMScholteJA. (2000) Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
PrakashAGugertyMK (eds) (2010) Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
PutnamRD (1988) Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization42: 427–460.
34.
RisseT (2012) Transnational Actors and World Politics. In: CarlsnaesWRisseTSimmonsBA (eds) Handbook of International Relations. London: SAGE Publishing, pp.426–452.
35.
RittbergerVZanglBKruckA (2012) International Organization, 2nd edn.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
RubinDB (1976) Inference and Missing Data. Biometrika63: 581–592.
37.
SchlozmanKLTierneyJT (1986) Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
StroupSSMurdieA (2012) There’s No Place like Home: Explaining International NGO Advocacy. Review of International Organizations7: 425–448.
40.
TallbergJDellmuthLMAgnéH. (2015) NGO Influence in International Organizations: Information, Access, and Exchange. British Journal of Political Science. Epub ahead of print 15September. DOI: 10.1017/S000712341500037X.
41.
TallbergJSommererTSquatritoT. (2013) The Opening up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
ThomsonGH (1951) The Factorial Analysis of Human Ability. London: University of London Press.
43.
TomzMWittenbergJKingG (2003) Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1, January5. Available at: http://gking.harvard.edu/ (accessed 18 January 2016).
44.
UhreAN (2014) Exploring the Diversity of Transnational Actors in Global Environmental Governance. Interest Groups & Advocacy3: 59–78.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
