This article adapts and develops the idea of a cynical or ‘stealth’ understanding of politics to explore how citizens’ estrangement from formal politics is processed cognitively through a populist lens. Earlier work has shown the widespread presence of stealth attitudes in the United States and Finland. We show that stealth attitudes are also well established in Britain, demonstrate their populist character and reveal that age, newspaper readership and concerns about governing practices help predict their adoption by individuals. Yet our survey findings also reveal a larger body of positive attitudes towards the practice of democracy suggesting that there is scope for challenging populist cynicism. We explore these so-called ‘sunshine’ attitudes and connect them to the reform options favoured by British citizens. If we are to challenge populist negativity towards politics, we conclude that improving the operation of representative politics is more important than offering citizens new forms of more deliberative participation.
AkkermanT (2003) Populism and Democracy: Challenge or Pathology?Acta Politica38 (2): 147–159.
2.
AlbertazziDMcDonnellD (eds) (2008) Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
AllenNBirchS (2014) Ethics and Integrity in British Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BeethamD (2011) Do Parliaments Have a Future? In: AlonsoSKeaneJMerkelW (ed.) The Future of Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.124–143.
5.
BengtssonAMattilaM (2009) Direct Democracy and Its Critics: Support for Direct Democracy and ‘Stealth’ Democracy in Finland. West European Politics32 (5): 1031–1048.
6.
CanovanM (1999) Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies47 (1): 2–16.
7.
CofféHMichelsA (2014) Education and Support for Representative, Direct and Stealth Democracy. Electoral Studies35 (September): 1–11.
8.
CrickB (2005) Populism, Politics and Democracy. Democratization12 (5): 625–632.
9.
DaltonR (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
FlindersM (2012) Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
FordRGoodwinM (2014) Revolt on the Right. London: Routledge.
14.
GavinNSandersD (2003) The Press and Its Influence on British Political Attitudes under New Labour. Political Studies51 (3): 573–591.
15.
Hansard Society (2013) Audit of Political Engagement 10: The 2013 Report. London: Hansard Society.
16.
HayC (2007) Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
HeldD (2006) Models of Democracy, 3rd edn.Cambridge: Polity Press.
18.
HibbingJRTheiss-MorseE (2001a) Process Preferences and American Politics: What People Want Government to Be. American Political Science Review95 (1): 145–153.
19.
HibbingJRTheiss-MorseE (2001b) The Means Is the End. In: HibbingJRTheiss-MorseE (ed.) What Is It about Government That Americans Dislike?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.243–250.
20.
HibbingJRTheiss-MorseE (2002) Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
MairP (2005) Democracy beyond Parties. Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California. Available at: http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/05-06 (accessed 5 November 2015).
22.
MazzoleniG (2008) Populism and the Media. In: AlbertazziDMcDonnellD (eds) Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.49–66.
23.
MényYSurelY (2002) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
MuddeC (2004) The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39 (4): 542–563.
25.
NebloMEsterlingKKennedyRP. (2010a) Who Wants to Deliberate – And Why?American Political Science Review104 (3): 566–583.
PastekJKrosnickJ (2010) Optimizing Survey Questionnaire Design in Political Science: Insights from Psychology. In: LeighleyJE (eds) The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.27–50.
30.
PharrSJPutnamR (eds) (2000) Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
SchumpeterJ (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
StokerG (2014) Political Citizenship and the Innocence of Youth. In: MycockATongeJ (eds) Beyond the Youth Citizenship Commission: Young People and Politics. London: Political Studies Association, pp.23–26.
34.
StokerGHayCBarrM (2015) Fast Thinking: Implications for Democratic Politics. European Journal of Political Research. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.1211.
35.
StreetJ (2011) Mass Media, Politics and Democracy, 2nd edn.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
TaggartP (2002) Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics. In: MényYSurelY (eds) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.62–79.
37.
TorcalMMonteroJR (eds) (2006) Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions and Politics. London: Routledge.
38.
WebbP (2013) Who Is Willing to Participate? Dissatisfied Democrats, Stealth Democrats and Populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research52 (6): 747–772.
39.
WhiteleyP (2011) Political Participation in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
