e.g., see Anns v. Merton London Borough Council [1978] A.C.728; Dorset Yacht Co. Ltd. v. Home Office [1970] A.C.1004; Hedley Byrne & Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners Ltd. [1964] A.C.465; McLoughlin v. O'Brian [1983] A.C.410 (see Khan, 12Anglo-American Law Review263).
4.
see Khan, “Recognition of Vicarious Liability for the Wrongful Acts of Police” (1977) Police Journal240–47.
5.
[1983] Q.B.1034.
6.
[1968] 2Q.B.118. As to the legal responsibilities and discretions of a police officer, see GillanceKhan“Constitutional Independence of Police Constable in the Exercise of the Powers of his Office” (1975) Police Journal, 55–62.
7.
[1985] A.C.210.
8.
[1956] A.C.696.
9.
For example, see the Home Office case, supra; the Hedley Byrne case, supra; the Anns case, supra; Dutton v. Bognor Regis Urban District Council (1972) 136J.P.201; [1972] 1Q.B.373; Sparham-Souter v. Town and Country Developments (Essex) Ltd [1976] 1Q.B.858; S.C.M. (United Kingdom) Ltd. v. W.J. Whittal & Sons Ltd [1971] 1Q.B.337; Ross v. Counter [1979] 3All E.R.580; McLoughlin v. O'Brian, supra.
10.
[1969] 2All E.R.564. See also The Vicar of Writtle v. Essex County Council (1979) 77L.G.R.656; Smith v. Scott [1973] Ch. 314; Ellis v. Home Office [1953] 2Q.B.135. See also Hampson, “Escaping Borstal Boys” [1969] C.L.J.273.
11.
See PearceLordDevlinLord in Hedley Byrne, supra.
12.
[1969] 1A.C.191.
13.
The following cases had been distinguished by the trial Judge: Marshall v. Osmond, supra; Knightley v. Johns [1982] 1W.L.R.349; Rigby v. Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 1W.L.R.1242.
14.
It is now envisaged to widen the Scheme and make it statutory rather than discretionary: See the Criminal Justice Act 1986.