BrandtT.WistE. R.YoungL. R.Foreground and background in dynamic spatial orientation. Perception and Psychophysics, 1975, 17,497–503.
2.
Department of Transport. Transport statistics, GB. 1974–1984. London: HMSO, 1985.
3.
DichgansJ.BrandtT.Visual-vestibular interaction. In HeldR.LeibowitzH. W.TeuberH. L. (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology. Vol. VIII. Perception. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1978. Pp. 755–804.
4.
ErikssonE. S.Movement parallax, anisotrophy, and relative size as determinants of space perception. Report 131, Dept. of Psychology, University of Uppsala, Sweden, 1972.
5.
HazlettR. D.AllenM. J.The ability to see a pedestrian at night: The effect of clothing, reflectorization, and driver intoxication. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of the American Academy of Optometry, 1968, 45, 246–257.
6.
HillsB. L.Vision, visibility, and perception in driving. Perception, 1980,9, 183–216.
7.
HolwayA. H.BoringE. G.Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant. American Journal of Psychology, 1941, 54, 21–37.
8.
LeibowitzH. W.PostR. B.BrandtT.DichgansJ.Implications of recent developments in dynamic spatial orientation and visual resolution for vehicle guidance. In WertheimA. H.WagenaarW. A.LeibowitzH. W. (Eds.), Tutorials on Motion Perception. New York: Plenum, 1982.
9.
LewisG. D.Children's aids to conspicuity. Transport and Road Research Laboratory (Crowthorne, UK), Report LR 534, 1973.
10.
LuriaS. M.KinneyJ. A. S.Judgment of distance under partially reduced cues. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 26, 1019–1028.
11.
OlsonP. L.PostD. V.Review of research evidence bearing on the desirability of using retroreflective license plates in Michigan. Highway Safety Research Institute, University of Michigan, 1977.
12.
PolusA.KatzA.An analysis of night-time pedestrian accidents of specially illuminated crosswalks. accident Analysis and Prevention, 10, 1978, 223–228.
13.
Reinhardt-RutlandA. H.The preception of slant under reduced viewing conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981, 53, 146.
14.
Reinhardt-RutlandA. H.A New visual factor in certain driving problems. In OsborneD. J. (Ed.), Contemporary ergonomics 1985. London: Taylor and Francis, 1985. Pp. 60–69.
15.
Reinhardt-RutlandA. H.Fast driving and close following in the fog: Can the driver's behaviour be improved?The Police Journal, 1986, LVIX, 81–83.
16.
RogersB. J.GrahamM. E.Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 1979, 8, 125–134.
17.
SchneiderG. E.Contrasting visuomotor functions in tectum and cortex in the golden hamster. Psychologische Forschung, 1967, 31, 52–62.
18.
ShinarD.RockwellT. H.MaleckiJ. A.The effects of changes in driver perception on rural curve negotiation. Ergonomics, 1980, 23, 263–275.
19.
ShinarD.The effects of expectancy, clothing reflectance, and detection criterion on nighttime pedestrian visibility. Human Factors, 1985, 27, 327–333.
20.
SmeedR. J.Pedestrian accidents. In HakkertA. S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Pedestrian Safety, Vol. 2. Haifa: Michlol, 1977. Pp. 7–21.
21.
ThompsonS. J.FraserE. J.HowarthC. I.Driver behaviour in the presence of child and adult pedestrians. Ergonomics, 1985, 28, 1469–1474.