Abstract

Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Devlin
Lord
, The Criminal Prosecution in England , Oxford University Press , 1960 , Page 16 .
2.
Marshall
Geoffrey
, “Police Accountability Revisited” in Policing and Politics by
Butler
D.
Hasley
A. H.
(Ed.), Macmillan 1978 , p. 51 .
3.Royal Commission on the Police (Willink Commission) , 1962 (Cmd. 1728) H.M.S.O. , p. 9 .
4.Ibid. , p. 39 .
5.As reported in H.M. Chief Inspector of Constabulary's report , 1975 , p. 4 .
6.
Scarman
Lord
, “The Brixton Disorders, April 10–12 1981” , (Cmd. 8427), H.M.S.O.
7.
Goodhart
A. L.
Dr.
, “Memorandum of Dissent” , Royal Commission on the Police , op. cit., p. 173 .
8.
Marshall
Geoffrey
Police and Government , Methuen & Co. , 1965 , p. 32 .
9.Ibid. , pp. 112 –7 .
10.
Marshall
Geoffrey
, Police Accountability Revisited , op. cit., p. 61 .
11.
Scarman
Lord
, op. cit., p. 94 .
12.Ibid. , p. 95 .
13.Times , June 14, 1982 .
14.Police Review , July 2, 1982 , p. 1274 .
15.
Scarman
Lord
, op. cit., p. 96 .
16.Police Review , March 26, 1982 , p. 578 .
17.The Police Act 1964 , s. 48 (1) enacts that chief officers shall be jointly liable for torts committed by constables.
18.Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure , (Cmd. 8092), p. 186 .
19.
Marshall
Geoffrey
, Police Accountability Revisited , op. cit., p. 62 .
20.
Newman
Kenneth
Sir
, Police Review , October 8, 1982 .
