JanowitzM., Social Control of Escalated Riots, (Center for Policy Study: Univ. of Chicago, Nov. 1967).
2.
Testimony of John Edgar Hoover, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, before the House Sub-Committee on Appropriations on April 17 1969, p. 58. An up-to-date picture of the F.B.I, is provided in ElliffJ. T., “Continuity and Change in the role of the F.B.I.” in MacNamaraD.RiedellM., (eds) Police, Prospectives, Problems, Prospects (Baeger: London1974).
GalliherJ. F.DonavanL. PatrickAdamsD. L. — “Small Town Police; Trouble, Tasks and Publics”. J. Police Sc. and Admin. 3(1) 1975, p. 20–25.
5.
See particularly the Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders, KernerChairman Otto (U.S. Govt. Printing Office: 1968) and the Report on Police (Task Force Chairman, E. M. Davis) of the National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals, Chairman, Russell W. Peterson (Washington D.C.: Jan. 1973). For short general discussions of policing in America related to these reports see: TerrisB. J., “The Role of the Police”, Annals Am. Acad, Pol. and Soc. Sc, 374, 1967 pp. 58–69 and GoldsteinH., “Police response to urban crisis”, Pub Admin. R., 281968, pp. 417–423.
6.
CosterC. M., “The Regional Council: The Neutral Broker in Criminal Justice Administration”, American County Govt., Vol 36(6) June 1971, p. 16–17.
7.
See NorrgardD. L. — Regional Law Enforcement — A Study of Intergovernmental Cooperation and Coordination, (Public Admin. Service: Chicago: 1969), pi and SaundersC. B.Jnr.Upgrading the American Police (The Brookings Institution: Washington D.C: 1970), p. 4.
8.
FarmerD. J., Civil Disorder Control — a planning program of municipal coordination and cooperation (Public Admin. Service: Chicago: 1968).
9.
The information relating to California is derived from: KranizW. A., (Chief, Law Enforcement Division, California Disaster Office) & YudowitchK. L. — “Mutual Aid”, Police Chief June 1970, pp. 64–68.
10.
OstromE.ParksR. B.WhitakerG. P. — “Do We Really Want to Consolidate Urban Police Forces? A Reappraisal of Some Old Assertions”, Public Admin. R., Vol. 33(5) Sept/Oct. 1973 pp. 423–432.
11.
Ibid. p. 430.
12.
The examples of consolidated police services are taken from the Report on Police, op cit. Ch 5; MarcusM.EdgarJ. M.WheatonR. J.HicoxR. C. (eds), Police Consolidation — A selected bibliography (Nat. Instit, of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice: LEAA: U.S. Dept. of Justice: April 1976) and CramerJ., The World's Police (Cassell; London, 1964) pp. 421–422.
13.
EastmanG. D.ChapmanS. G. — Short of Merger (Lexington Books: Mass. U.S.A.: 1976) p. 145f.
14.
See for example — WengerD. — “The Reluctant Army: The Functioning of Police Departments in Civil Disturbances”, Am. Behav. Scientist. 16(3) Feb. 1973; BeckG. N., “S.W.A.T. — the Los Angeles Special Weapons and Tactics Teams”, F.B.I. Law Enforcement BulletinVol. 41 (No. 4) 1972; PittsC. H.Capt., “A Tactical Operations Unit”, F.B.I. Law Enforcement Bulletin, Vol. 44 (1) 1975.
15.
TafoyaW. L. — “S.W.A.T. — Special Weapons and Tactics Pt. 1”, P.W.C. Bulletin, LXXV (8) Feb. 1975, p. 5.
16.
BouzaA. V. (ex Capt. N.Y.P.D.) Police Intelligence (A.M.S. Press Inc.: New York: 1976).
17.
Ibid. p. 7–8.
18.
SmithB. — Police Systems in the United States (Harper Bros.: New York: 1949) p. 181.
19.
Conflict Management Manual (Special Task Unit, Louisiana State Police, Baton Rouge: Louisiana, 1973) p. 25.