For representative examples and surveys on the subject see PaukerGuy J., “Southeast Asia as a Problem Area in the Next Decade”. World Politics, XI (April, 1959) FinerSamuel E., The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics (London, 1962): JohnsonJohn J. (ed.) The Role of the Military in Underdeveloped Countries; (Princeton, 1962) DaalderHans, The Role of the Military in Emerging Countries (The Hague, 1962); GutteridgeWilliam, Armed Forces in New States (London, 1962); JanowitzMorris, The Military in the Political Development of New Nations (Chicago, 1964) HamonLeo, (ed.) Le Rôle Extra — Militaire de l'Arme dans Tiers Monde (Paris, 1966) McWilliamsWilson C., (ed.) Garrisons and Government (San Francisco, 1967) — GlickEdward B., Peaceful Conflict: The Non Military Use of the Military (Harrisburg, 1967) Van DoornJacques (ed.) Armed Forces and Society (The Hague, 1968); BienenHenry (ed.) The Military Intervenes (New York, 1968); idem (ed.) The Military and Modernization (Chicago, 1971); NordlingerEric A., “Soldiers in Mofti: The Impact of Military Rule Upon Economic and Social Change in Non-Western States”, American Political Science Review, LXIV (September, 1970); LovellJohn P., “Military Dominated Regimes and Political Development”, in PalmerMonteSternLarry (eds.), Political Development in Changing Societies (Lexington, 1971).
2.
For representative evaluations and critiques of the state of the field of political development and modernization see WillnerAnn Ruth, “The Underdeveloped Study of Political Development”, World Politics, XVI (April, 1964); HalpernManfred, “Toward Further Modernization of the Study of New Nations,”World Politics, XVII (October, 1964); idem, “The Rate and Costs of Political Development”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 358 (March, 1965); PyeLucian W., “The Concept of Political Development”, in ibid; PackenhamRobert A., “Approaches to the Study of Political Development”, World Politics, XVII (October, 1964); RiggsFred W., “The Theory of Political Development”, in CharlesworthJames C. (ed.), Contemporary Political Analysis (New York, 1967); ApterDavid E., Some Conceptual Approaches to the Study of Modernization (Englewood Cliffs, 1968); HuntingtonSamuel P., “The Change to Change”, Comparative PoliticsIII (April, 1971); La PalombaraJoseph, “Political Science and the Engineering of Political Development”, in PalmerStern, Political Development in Changing Societies.
3.
HuntingtonSamuel P., “Political Development and Political Decay”, World Politics, XVII (April, 1965); idem, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven, 1968); PerlmutterAmos, “The Praetorian State and the Praetorian Army”, Comparative Politics, 1 (April, 1969).
4.
Huntington, Political Order, Ch. IV.
5.
For a good sample of such examples, see FinkleJason L.GableRichard W. (eds.), Political Development and Social Change (New York, 1966).
6.
The two notable exceptions, and in fact, the two pioneering works on the police and political development are: BayleyDavid H., The Police and Political Development in India (Princeton, 1969), especially Chs. I and VI and PotholmChristian P., “The Multiple Roles of the Police as seen in the African Context”, The Journal of Developing Areas, III (January, 1969).
7.
FinkleGable, passim.
8.
On the difficulties of this see BiesenHenry, “Foreign Policy, The Military and Development: Military Assistance and Political Change in Africa”, in ButwellRichard (ed.) Foreign Policy and the Developing Nation (Lexington, 1969).
9.
On this see in particular Packenham, “Approaches to the Study of Political Development”, and Pye, “The Concept of Political Development”.
10.
The classification so far has been based on ibid.
11.
Huntington, Political Order.
12.
Halpern. “The Rate and Costs of Political Development”, EisenstadtS. N., Modernization: Protest and Change (Englewood Cliffs, 1966).
13.
PennockJ. Roland, “Political Development, Political Systems and Political Goods,”World PoliticsXVIII (April, 1965).
14.
BinderLeonard, ColemanJames S., La PalombaraJoseph, PyeLucian W.VerbaSidneyWeinerMyron, Crises and Sequences in Political Development (Princeton, 1970).
15.
Janowitz, The Military in the Political Development of New Nations, passim.
16.
Bienen, The Military Intervenes; RustowDankwart A., “The Military in Middle Eastern Society and Politics” in FinkleGable, especially p. 391.
17.
See especially Perlmutter, “The Praetorian State and the Praetorian Army”; Huntington, Political Order, Ch. IV; SpringerPhilip B., “Disunity and Disorder: Factional Politics in the Argentine Military in Bienen.”The Military Intervenes; and BeeriEliezer, Army Officers in Arab Politics and Society (New York, 1969).
18.
See Huntington, Ch. IV and especially HeapheyJames, “The Organization of Egypt: Inadequacies of a Nonpolitical Model for Nation-Building”, World Politics, XVIII (January, 1966).
19.
Ben-DorGabriel, “The Politics of Threat: Military Intervention in the Middle East”, Journal of Political and Military Sociology I (Spring, 1973).
20.
FeitEdward, “Military Coups and Political Development, Some Lessons from Ghana and Nigeria”World Politics, XX (January, 1968): AfrifaA., The Ghana Coup (London; 1966).
21.
Janowitz, pp. 86–87.
22.
Potholm, p. 141.
23.
ColemanJames S.BriceBelmontJr., “The Role of the Military in Subsaharan Africa”, in Johnson, The Role of the Military in Underdeveloped Countries.
24.
Rustow, p. 391.
25.
Springer, “Disunity and Disorder …”BeblerAnton, Military Rule in Africa (Princeton University Center of International Studies Monograph, 1971), especially p. 329.
26.
There are, of course, exceptions to this statement: In several countries, police forces are larger than military forces (Potholm, p. 141).
27.
LuckhamA. R., “A Comparative Typology of Civil-Military Relations”, Government and Opposition, VI (Winter, 1971) pp. 17–20.
28.
BienenCf., “Foreign Policy, The Military and Development” … p. 73 and passim.
29.
BayleyThe Police and Political Development in India, Ch. 1.
30.
ibid., p. 16.
31.
ibid., pp. 17–18.
32.
ibid., p. 18.
33.
ibid., p. 19.
34.
the last three quotations are from ibid., p. 23.
35.
ibid., p. 25.
36.
ibid.
37.
ibid., p. 26.
38.
ibid., pp. 26–27.
39.
The best examples of this are PyeLucian W., “Armies in the Process of Political Modernization”, in Johnson, The Role of the Military volume, JanowitzMorris, (ed.) The New Military (New York, 1965), especially the “Introduction”, HuntingtonSamuel P.“The New Military Politics”, in idem (ed.) Changing Pattern of Military Politics (New York, 1962). See also PerlmutterAmos, “The Arab-Military Elite”, World Politics, XXII (January, 1970) pp. 270–275.
40.
This approach has clear implications in regard to re-evaluating the conventional role of the police in the so-called developed nations as well. See, for instance, BantonMichael, The Policeman in the Community (New York, 1964); WhitakerBen, The Police (Harmondsworth, 1964) and WilsonO. W., Police Administration (New York, 1963). On this see also BienenHenry, Violence and Social Change (Chicago, 1968), passim.
41.
Bayley, p. 27.
42.
ibid., p. 14.
43.
See, for instance, GrimshawAllen, “Police Agencies and the Prevention of Racial Violence”Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 54 (March, 1962).
44.
Occasional remarks on this are made in two recent comprehensive works on corruption: HeidenheimerArnold J. (ed.), Political Corruption (New York, 1970) and ScottJames C., Comparative Political Corruption (Englewood Cliffs, 1972).
45.
La PalombaraJoseph (ed.), Bureaucracy and Political Development (Princeton, 1963), passim.
46.
Janowitz, The Role of the Military; Pye“Armies in the Process of Political Modernization”; Daalder, The Role of the Military.
47.
This is well-summarized in Glick, Peaceful Conflict.
48.
Bayley, p. 27.
49.
The cost of such a way of channeling investment in armed forces may be lower also in terms of internal dislocations. See BarberWillard F.RonningC. Neale, Internal Security and Military Power (Columbus, 1966).
50.
PyeLucian W., “The Non-Western Political Process”, in EcksteinHarryApterDavid E., Comparative Politics: A Reader (New York, 1963), p. 664.
51.
ZolbergAristide R., Creating Political Order (Chicago1967).
52.
LernerF. Daniel, “Some Comments on Center-Periphery Relations” in MerrittRichard L.RokkanStein (eds.) Comparing Nations (New Haven, 1966); “Centers and Periphery in Society and Social Science” in NettlJ. Peter, Political Mobilization (New York, 1967) and the classic formulation in ShilsEdward, “Center and Periphery” in The Logic of Personal Knowledge: Essays Presented to Michael Polanyi; on his Seventieth Birthday (Glencoe, 1961).
53.
This distinction is drawn from BachrachPeterBaratzMorton C., “Decisions and Non-Decisions: An Analytical Framework”, American Political Science Review, 57 (September, 1963).
54.
ShilsEdward, Political Development in the New States (The Hague, 1962).
55.
Huntington, Political Order, Ch. I.
56.
ibid., p. 12.
57.
ibid.
58.
FeitEdward, “Pen, Sword and People: Military Regimes in the Formation of Political Institutions”World Politics, XXV (January, 1973), p. 251. Italics in the original.
59.
ibid., p. 252.
60.
ibid.
61.
ibid. Italics in the original.
62.
Cf. Heaphey“The Organization of Egypt”.
63.
Cf. DuncanHugh Daniel. Symbols in Society (New York, 1968); EdelmanMurray, The Symbolic Uses of Politics (Urbara, 1964).
64.
PyeLucian W., Politics, Personality and Nation-Building (New Haven, 1962), especially pp. 38–51.
65.
de JouvenelBertrand, Sovereignty (Chicago, 1963) p. 123.
66.
Huntington, Political Order, p 28.
67.
These were published by the Princeton University Press and included PyeLucian W. (ed.) Communications and Political Development (1963); La PalombaraJoseph (ed.); Bureaucracy and Political Development (1963); WardRobert E.RustowDankwart A., Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey (1964); ColemanJames S. (ed.) Education and Political Development (1965) PyeLucian W.VerbaSidney (eds.), Political Culture and Political Development (1965); La PalombaraJosephWeinerMyron, Political Parties and Political Development (1966); and Binder, Crises and Sequences in Political Development.
68.
BinderLeonard, “Crises of Political Development” and ColemanJames C., “The Development Syndrome”, in Binder, Crises and Sequences.
69.
La PalombaraJoseph, “Distribution: A Crisis of Resource Management” in ibid.
70.
Potholm, p. 141. Potholm identifies among the “functions and capabilities of the police”: “maintenance of law and order”, “paramilitary operations”, “regulating activities”, “regime representation” (pp. 142–150).
71.
PyeLucian W., “The Legitimacy Crisis” and idem“Identity and the Political Culture” in Binder, Crises and Sequences.
72.
OlsonMancurJunior, “Rapid Growth as a Destabilizing Force”, Journal of Economic History, 23 (December, 1963).
73.
Potholm, p. 151; Bayley, p. 29.
74.
Cf. GeertzClifford, “The Integrative Revolution: Primordial Sentiments and Civil (Politics in the New States”, in idem (ed.) Old Societies and New States (New York, 1963).
75.
WeinerMyron, “Political Integration and Political Development”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 358 (March, 1965).
76.
AlmondGabriel A.PowellC. BinghamJr.Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach (Boston, 1966) p. 69. My Italics.
77.
Adjacent in the sense used in EcksteinHarry, “A Theory of Stable Democracy” in idem, Division and Cohesion in Democracy (Princeton, 1966), pp. 239–241.
78.
Bayley, pp. 28–29.
79.
Portholm, p. 150.
80.
See the sophisticated analysis of role expansion in LissakMoshe, “Modernization and Role-Expansion of the Military in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis”, Comparative Studies in Society and HistoryIX (April, 1967).