Police use of TASER: A systematic review of potential decision factors,including officer crewing levels

Abstract

Police use of TASER can have serious consequences; therefore, it is important to examine any modifiable operational factors that impact an officer’s decision to use TASER. As previous research has identified a potential relationship between crewing and TASER use, a systematic review was undertaken to explore which factors might impact use of TASER by the Police Service of England and Wales, including officer crewing levels. Over 14,000 records were screened, resulting in a final sample of 20 studies; with findings indicating that further research is needed to better understand TASER use and ensure policy is well informed and appropriate.

Keywords

Police TASER crewing conducted energy device

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

*References preceded by an asterisk indicate papers included within the systematic review.

Adebowale

(2013) The Independent Commission on Mental Health and Policing Report. The Independent Commission on Mental Health and Policing. https://amhp.org.uk/app/uploads/2017/08/independent_commission_on_mental_health_and_policing_main_report.pdf

Archbold

(2013) Policing. Sage Publications (ISBN: 9781412993692). https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/50819_ch_1.pdf.

Betts

Farmer

(2019) Home Office Police Front Line Review: Workshops With Police Officers and Police Staff. Office for National Statistics. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/815103/flr-workshops-with-police-officers-and-staff-full-report.pdf

* Bishopp

Klinger

Morris

(2015) An examination of the effect of a policy change on police use of TASERs. Criminal Justice Policy Review 26(7): 727–746. DOI: 10.1177/0887403414543558.

* Boehme

Martin

Kaminski

(2021) Evaluating the 4th Circuit’s decision to limit officer use of Tasers: a descriptive and time-series approach. Police Practice and Research 23: 523–538. DOI: 10.1080/15614263.2021.1982713.

* Brandl

Stroshine

(2017) Oleoresin capsicum spray and TASERs: a comparison of factors predicting use and effectiveness. Criminal Justice Policy Review 28(3): 279–306. DOI: 10.1177/0887403415578732.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA

Buttle

(2010) The case against arming the New Zealand police. Academia. Edu. https://www.academia.edu/395156

10.

Childers

Chan

Vilke

(2020) TASER conducted electrical weapons. In: Stark

(ed) Clinical Forensic Medicine: A Physician’s Guide. Berlin: Springer, 279–312. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29462-5_8.

11.

* Crow

Adrion

(2011) Focal concerns and police use of force: examining the factors associated with taser use. Police Quarterly 14(4): 366–387. DOI: 10.1177/1098611111423740.

12.

de Lint

Potts

(2004) Public Order Policing in Canada: An Analysis of Operations in Recent High Stakes Events. Ipperwash Inquiry. https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/ipperwash/policy_part/research/pdf/deLint.pdf

13.

Defence Scientific Advisory Council Sub-Committee on the Medical Implications of Less-Lethal Weapons (2008) Taser Policy and Guidance – Authorised Firearms Officers – December 2008. Appendix B (DSTL/BSC/27/01/07). Defence Science and Technology Laboratory. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/443825/DOMILL11_20081107_TASER05.pdf

14.

Defence Scientific Advisory Council Sub-Committee on the Medical Implications of Less-Lethal Weapons (2012) Statement on the Medical Implications of Use of the Taser X26 and M26 Less-Lethal Systems on Children and Vulnerable Adults (DSTL/BSC/27/01/11-Amended 27 January 2012). Defence Science and Technology Laboratory. http://data.parliament.uk/DepositedPapers/Files/DEP2012-0729/96605_Library_Deposit.pdf

15.

* DeLone

Thompson

(2009) The application and use of TASERs by a Midwestern police agency. International Journal of Police Science and Management 11(4): 414–428. DOI: 10.1350/ijps.2009.11.4.139.

16.

* den Heyer

(2020) An analysis of the effectiveness and use by the New Zealand Police of the TASER from 2009 to 2017. International Journal of Police Science and Management 22(4): 356–365. DOI: 10.1177/1461355720947779.

17.

Dror

(2007) Perception of Risk and the Decision to Use Force. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 1(3): 265–272. DOI: 10.1093/police/pam041.

18.

* Dymond

(2016) Police use of taser in England and Wales, 2004–2014. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Exeter, Exeter, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

19.

* Dymond

(2018) ‘Taser, taser’! Exploring factors associated with police use of taser in England and Wales. Policing and Society 30: 396–411. DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2018.1551392.

20.

Elliott-Davies

(2019) PFEW Demand, Capacity and Welfare Survey 2018 Headline Statistics December 2018 (Report: R101/2018). Police Federation of England and Wales. http://www.polfed.org/documents/DemandCapacityandWelfareSurveyHeadlineStatistics2018-06-02-19-V1.pdf

21.

Elliott-Davies

Donnelly

Boag-Munroe

, et al. (2016) ‘Getting a battering’ the perceived impact of demand and capacity imbalance within the police service of England and Wales: a qualitative review. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles 89(2): 93–116. DOI: 10.1177/0032258X16642234.

22.

* Escalante

(2020) A phenomenological study: police officers’ lived experiences with the use of CEDs. Walden dissertations and doctoral studies collection. Doctoral Thesis, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/8883/

23.

* Gau

Mosher

Pratt

(2010) An inquiry into the impact of suspect race on police use of tasers. Police Quarterly 13(1): 27–48. DOI: 10.1177/1098611109357332.

24.

Goldsmith

(2001) Police power and democracy in Australia. Policing, Security and Democracy: Theory and Practice. Huntsville, TX: Office of International Criminal Justice, 133–156.

25.

Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (2017) PEEL: police legitimacy 2017 a national overview (ISBN: 978-1-78655-480-2). https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/wp-content/uploads/peel-police-legitimacy-2017-1.pdf

26.

Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (2018) Policing and mental health picking up the pieces (ISBN: 978-1-78655-741-4). https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/wp-content/uploads/policing-and-mental-health-picking-up-the-pieces.pdf

27.

* Hine

Porter

Westera

, et al. (2018) What were they thinking? Factors influencing police recruits’ decisions about force. Policing and Society 29(6): 673–691. DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2018.1432612.

28.

Home Office (2019) Police Use of Force Statistics, England and Wales: April 2018 to March 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/police-use-of-force-statistics-england-and-wales-april-2018-to-march-2019

29.

Home Office (2020) Police Use of Force Statistics, England and Wales: April 2019 to March 2020 Experimental Statistics. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/945435/police-use-of-force-apr2019-mar2020-hosb3720.pdf

30.

Home Office (2022a) Police Use of Force Statistics, England and Wales: April 2021 to March 2022: Data Tables. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/police-use-of-force-statistics-england-and-wales-april-2021-to-march-2022.

31.

Home Office (2022b) Police Use of Force Statistics, England and Wales: April 2021 to March 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/police-use-of-force-statistics-england-and-wales-april-2021-to-march-2022/police-use-of-force-statistics-england-and-wales-april-2021-to-march-2022

32.

Independent Office for Police Conduct (2020, May 14) IOPC Calls for Greater Scrutiny of Taser Use Following Increasing Concerns. https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/news/iopc-calls-greater-scrutiny-taser-use-following-increasing-concerns

33.

Kane

White

(2015) TASER® exposure and cognitive impairment. Criminology & Public Policy 15(1): 79–107. DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12173.

34.

Klahm

Tillyer

(2010) Understanding police use of force: a review of the evidence. Southwest journal of criminal justice 7(2): 214–239. https://6c46cd80-4ef7-424c-bdc5-555a6298416a.filesusr.com/ugd/4d13c6_4055b291cb2c46e2a2c3e6a9491ca767.pdf

35.

Kroll

Brave

Pratt

HMO

, et al. (2019) Benefits, risks, and myths of TASER® handheld electrical weapons. Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety, 3(1): 7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41314-019-0021-9

36.

* Kuzik

(2019) Police use of force and officer injury: a closer examination of the impact of taser deployment and contextual factors. Master’s Thesis, The University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV. ProQuest dissertations and theses global. (Publication No. 13812854).

37.

Landis

Koch

(1977) The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33(1): 159–174. DOI: 10.2307/2529310.

38.

* Lin

Jones

(2010) Electronic control devices and use of force outcomes, Incidence and severity of use of force, and frequency of injuries to arrestees and police officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 33(1): 152–178. DOI: 10.1108/13639511011020647.

39.

Little

Hogbin

Burt

(2013) Tasers and psychiatry: some thoughts and observations. Journal of Psychiatric Intensive Care 9(1): 49–55. DOI: 10.1017/S1742646412000118.

40.

* Mesloh

Henych

Hougland

, et al. (2005) TASER and less lethal weapons: an exploratory analysis of deployments and effectiveness. Law Enforcement Executive Forum 5(5): 67–79.

41.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

PRISMA Group , et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 151(4): 264–269. https://annals.org/aim/fullarticle/744664/preferred-reporting-items-systematic-reviews-meta-analyses-prisma-statement

42.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2012) Methods for the development of NICE public health guidance (3rd edition). https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg4/chapter/introduction

43.

National Police Chiefs’ Council (2020, December 17) Disproportionality in Police Use of Taser: Independent Panel Chair Announced. https://news.npcc.police.uk/releases/disproportionality-in-police-use-of-taser-independent-panel-chair-announced

44.

O’Brien

McKenna

(2007) Concerns about the use of TASERs® on people with mental illness in New Zealand. Journal of Forensic Nursing 3(2): 89–92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2007.tb00110.x.

45.

O’Brien

Thom

(2014) Police use of TASER devices in mental health emergencies: a review. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 37(4): 420–426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2007.tb00110.x.

46.

Office for National Statistics (2019) The Nature of Violent Crime in England and Wales: Year Ending March 2018. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/thenatureofviolentcrimeinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2018

47.

* Quinton

Dymond

Boyd

, et al. (2020) Police Use of Force: Tactics, Assaults and Safety Exploratory Analysis of Police Recorded Data 2017/18. College of Policing. https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2020-09/200818-use-of-force-final-report-1.0.pdf.

48.

* Ready

White

(2011) Exploring patterns of TASER use by the police: an officer-level analysis. Journal of Crime and Justice 34(3): 190–204. DOI: 10.1080/0735648X.2011.609741.

49.

Scientific Advisory Committee on the Medical Implications of Less-Lethal Weapons (2016) Statement on the medical implications of use of the TASER X2 conducted energy device system (HQSG/SACMILL/STATEMENTS/001/TASER_X2_CED, dated 30 august 2016-amended 12 october 2016). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/595242/Medical_Statement_on_the_TASER_X2_system.pdf

50.

Shamseer

Moher

Clarke

PRISMA-P Group , et al. (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 350: g7647. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.

51.

*Sierra-Arévalo

(2019) Technological innovation and police officers’ understanding and use of force. Law & Society Review 53(2): 420–451. DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12383.

52.

* Sousa

Ready

Ault

(2010) The impact of TASERs on police use-of-force decisions: findings from a randomized field-training experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology 6(1): 35–55. DOI: 10.1007/s11292-010-9089-1.

53.

TASER International (2013) TASER® Handheld CEW Warnings, Instructions, and Information: Law Enforcement. Important Safety and Health Information. Retrieved 28 November, 2019, from. https://prismic-io.s3.amazonaws.com/tasr%2Fa8e6e721-590b-459b-a741-cd0e6401c340_law-enforcement-warnings.pdf

54.

* Thomas

Collins

Lovrich

(2010) Conducted energy device use in municipal policing: results of a national survey on policy and effectiveness assessments. Police Quarterly 13(3): 290–315. DOI: 10.1177/1098611110373995.

55.

TNS-BMRB (2015) Attitudes to Mental Illness 2014 Research Report. Prepared for Time to Change. https://www.time-to-change.org.uk/sites/default/files/Attitudes_to_mental_illness_2014_report_final_0.pdf

56.

UK Government (2018, August 1) Regional Ethnic Diversity. https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/uk-population-by-ethnicity/national-and-regional-populations/regional-ethnic-diversity/latest#full-page-history

57.

* White

Ready

(2007) The TASER as a less lethal force alternative: findings on use and effectiveness in a large metropolitan police agency. Police Quarterly 10(2): 170–191. DOI: 10.1177/1098611106288915.