Police agencies have an important role to play in responding to intimate partner violence (IPV) situations. The objective of our study was to examine how police officers define IPV and to circumscribe police officers’ attitudes about the issue. This study examined results from a survey conducted with police officers (N = 169) in the province of New Brunswick. A major implication of our study points toward education and training as a necessary passage to more efficient intervention as perceptions are not enough to make an informed decision about IPV situations.
BalenovichJGrossiEHughesT (2008) Towards a balanced approach: defining police roles in responding to domestic violence. American Journal of Criminal Justice33: 19–31.
2.
BallucciDGillCCampbellMA (2017) The power of attitude: the role pf police culture and receptivity of risk assessment tools in IPV calls. Policing11: 242–257.
3.
BarnettOW (2000) Why battered women do not leave, part 1 external inhibiting factors within society. Trauma, Violence & Abuse1(4): 343–372.
4.
BlaneyE (2010) Police officers’ views of specialized intimate partner violence training. Policing: An International Journal33(2): 354–375.
5.
BoppMBoppJLanePJr (2003) Aboriginal Domestic Violence in Canada. Ottawa: The Aboriginal Healing Foundation.
6.
BrownT (2000) Charging and Prosecution Policies in Cases of Spousal Assault: A Synthesis of Research, Academic, and Judicial Responses. Ottawa: Department of Justice.
7.
BurczyckaMConroyS (2018) Family Violence in Canada: A Statistical Profile, 2016. Ottawa: Statistics Canada/Minister of Industry.
8.
CampbellJCManganellaJ (2006) Changing public attitudes as a prevention strategy to reduce intimate partner violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma13(3–4): 13–39.
9.
CampbellMAGillCBallucciS (2018) Informing police response to intimate partner violence: predictors of perceived usefulness of risk assessment screening. Journal of Police & Criminal Psychology33(2): 175–187.
10.
DeJongCBurgess-ProctorAElisL (2008) Police officer perceptions of intimate partner violence: an analysis of observational data. Violence and Victims23(6): 683–696.
11.
EigenbergHMKapplerVEMcGuffeeD (2012) Confronting the complexities of domestic violence: a social prescription for rethinking police training. Journal of Police Crisis Negociations12(2): 122–145.
12.
Federal-Provincial-Territorial (2013) Making the Links in Family Violence Cases: Collaboration Among the Family, Child Protection and Criminal Justice Systems. Ottawa: Department of Justice.
GaddDFoxCLHaleR (2014) Preliminary steps towards a more preventative approach to eliminating violence against women in Europe. European Journal of Criminology11(4): 464–480.
15.
Garcia-MorenoCJansenHAEllsbergM, et al. (2006) Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet368: 1260–1269.
16.
GillCFitchL (2016) Developing and delivering a national framework for collaborative police action to intimate partner violence in Canada. Journal of Community Safety & Well-Being1(3): 51–55.
17.
GillCFitchLGreenwoodK (2016) National Framework on Collaborative Police Action on Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). Fredericton: University of New Brunswick.
18.
GillCRuffR (2010) Moncton Provincial Court-Domestic Violence Pilot Project: A Comparative Study. Unpublished report, Fredericton: Muriel McQueen Fergusson Centre for Family Violence Research.
19.
GoverADagmar PudrzynskaPDodgeM (2011) Law enforcement officers’ attitudes about domestic violence. Violence against Women17(5): 619–636.
20.
GraciaEGarciaFLilaM (2008) Police involvement in cases of intimate partner violence. The influence of perceived severity and personal responsibility. Violence Against Women14(6): 697–714.
21.
GraciaEGarciaFLilaM (2011) Police attitudes toward policing partner violence against women: do they correspond to different psychological profiles?Journal of Interpersonal Violence26(1): 189–207.
22.
HartBJKleinAR (2013) Practical Implications of Current Intimate Partner Violence Research for Victim Advocates and Service Providers. Falls Church, VA: Department of Justice.
23.
HiltonNZHarrisGT (2009) Criminal justice responses to partner violence: history, evaluation, and lessons learned. In: WhittakerDJLutzkerJR (eds), Preventing Partner Violence: Research and Evidence-Based Intervention Strategies. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 219–243.
24.
HueyL (2016) From seeds to orchards: using evidence-based policing to address Canada’s policing needs. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice58(1): 119–131.
25.
JohnsonHDawsonM (2010) Violence Against Women in Canada: Research and Policy Perspectives. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
26.
JohnsonM (2008) A Typology of Domestic Violence. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
27.
KroppR (2004) Some questions regarding spousal assault risk assessment. Violence against Women10(6): 676–697.
28.
LeisenringA (2011) “Whoa! They could’ve arrested me!”: unsuccessful identity claims of women during police response to intimate partner violence. Qualitative Sociology34: 353–370.
29.
LockwoodDProhaskaA (2015) Police officer gender and attitudes toward intimate partner violence: how policy can eliminate stereotypes. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences10(1): 77–89.
30.
MartinDMosherJE (1995) Unkept promises: experiences of immigrant women with the neo-criminalization of wife abuse. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law8: 3–44.
31.
MazerollePLegoszMSellersS (2013) Policing Violent Relationships. An Exploration of Police Attitudes to Intimate Partner Violence. (Unpublished report), Brisbane: Griffith University.
32.
McKennaPF (2018) Evidence-based policing in Canada. Canadian Public Administration61(1): 135–139.
33.
McPhedranSGoverAMazerolleP (2017) A cross-national comparison of police attitudes about domestic violence: a focus on gender. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management40(2): 214–227.
34.
Mental Health Centre Penetanguishene (2005) Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA). Penetanguishene: Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care.
35.
MessingJTCampbellJ (2016) Informing collaborative interventions: intimate partner violence risk assessment for front line police officers. Policing10(4): 328–340.
36.
MyhillAJohnsonK (2016) Police use of discretion in response to domestic violence. Criminology & Criminal Justice16(1): 3–20.
37.
PenceEPaymarM (1993) Education Groups for Men Who Batter: The Duluth Model. New York, NY: Springer.
38.
Perez TrujilloMRossS (2008) Police response to domestic violence. Making decisions about risk and risk management. Journal of Interpersonal Violence23(4): 454–473.
39.
Province of New Brunswick (2012) Moving from Theory to Outcomes: New Brunswick’s Crime Prevention and Reduction Strategy. Fredericton; New Brunswick: Province of New Brunswick.
40.
RichardLLetchfordSStrattonS (2008) Policing Domestic Violence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
RussellBSturgeonJA (2019) Police evaluations of intimate partner violence in heterosexual and same-sex relationships: do experience and training play a role?Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology34(1): 34–44.
42.
RydellRJMcConnellARMackieDM, et al. (2006) Of two minds: forming and changing valence-inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes. Psychological Science17(11): 954–958.
43.
ShepardMFCampbellJA (1992) A measure of psychological and physical abuse. Journal of interpersonal Violence7(3): 291–305.
44.
StalansLJFinnMA (2006) Public’s and police officers’ interpretation and handling of domestic violence cases. Divergent realities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence21(9): 1129–1155.
45.
Statistics Canada (2015) Family Violence in Canada: A Statistical Profile, 2013. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
46.
StoreyJEKroppRPHartSD, et al. (2014) Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the brief spousal assault form for the evaluation of risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior41(2): 256–271.
47.
StoreyJEStrandS (2017) The influence of victim vulnerability and gender on police officers’ assessment of intimate partner violence risk. Journal of Family Violence32: 125–134.
48.
SunIY (2007) Policing domestic violence: does officer gender matter?Journal of Criminal Justice35: 581–595.
49.
TaftCTLamotteADGilbertKS (2017) Intimate partner violence: evaluation of victims and perpetrators. In: PhillipMK (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Emergencies and Crises. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 196–214.
50.
TatumKMPenceR (2015) Factors that affect the arrest decision in domestic violence cases. Policing: An International Journal38(1): 56–79.
51.
TelepCW (2017) Police officer receptivity to research and evidence-based policing: examining variability within and across agencies. Crime and Delinquency63(8): 976–999.
52.
UrselJTuttyLMLeMaistreJ (2008) The justice system response to domestic violence: debates, discussions and dialogues. In: UrselJTuttyLMLeMaistreJ (eds), What’s Law Got to do With it? The Law, Specialized Courts and Domestic Violence in Canada Toronto. MN: Cormorant Books, pp. 1–17.
53.
World Health Organization (2013) Responding to Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence Against Women. WHO Clinical and Policy Guidelines. Washington, DC: WHO.
