Accreditation suggests an organisation has met standards of quality through extensive self-study and external review. This study examines the influence of Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) accreditation on citizen complaints. We identified the accredited status of the agencies included in the 2007 LEMAS report as CALEA-accredited or non-accredited resulting in a final sample size for this study of 628 agencies (CALEA accredited = 314, non-accredited = 314). Findings suggest that no difference exists between CALEA-accredited agencies and non-accredited agencies in: (1) the total number of complaints received; (2) the number of sustained citizen complaints.
AdamsK (1995) Measuring the prevalence of police abuse of force. In: GellerWTochH (eds) And Justice for All: Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse of Force. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum, 61–98.
2.
AlpertGMacDonaldJ (2001) Police use of force: An analysis of organizational characteristics. Justice Quarterly18(2): 393–409.
3.
BakerS (1995) The Effects of Law Enforcement Accreditation on Officer Selection, Promotion, and Education. Westport, CT: Praeger.
4.
BizzackJ (1993) Professionalism and Law Enforcement Accreditation: The First Ten Years. Lexington, KY: Autumn House.
5.
BrandlSStroshineMFrankJ (2001) Who are the complaint-prone officers? An examination of the relationship between police officers’ attributes, arrest activity, assignment, and citizens’ complaints about excessive force. Journal of Criminal Justice29(6): 521–529.
6.
BrittCWeisburdD (2010) Statistical power. In PiqueroAWeisburdD (eds). Handbook of Quantitative Criminology. New York: Springer.
7.
CarteGCarteE (1975) Police Reform in the United States: The Era of August Vollmer, 1905–1932. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
CarterDSappA (1994) Issues and perspectives of law enforcement accreditation: A national study of police chiefs. Journal of Criminal Justice22(3): 195–204.
11.
CharbonneauERiccucciN (2008) Beyond the usual suspects: An analysis of the performance measurement literature on social equity indicators in policing. Public Performance and Management Review31(4): 604–620.
12.
CheurprakobkitS (1996) Law enforcement accreditation. TELEMASP Bulletin3(2): 1–7.
13.
ChristensenD (2001) Blood money. Miami Daily Business Review15 November: A1.
CordnerGWilliamsG (1998) Community Policing and Accreditation: Compatibility or Conflict?Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US. Department of Justice.
16.
CrowderW (1998) Law Enforcement Accreditation: Has it Professionalized American Law Enforcement?Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Union Institute.
17.
DaulerKRomanoJ (1993) Lawsuits are making the police gun-shy. New York Times, 11 April: 1.
18.
DoernerWDoernerW (2012) Police accreditation and clearance rates. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management35(1): 6–24.
19.
DuroseMSchmittELanganP (2005) Contacts between Police and the Public: Findings from the 2002 National Survey. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
FalzaranoR (11, 1999) Law enforcement accreditation: One department’s experience. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 1–5.
22.
GautW (2012) Examining the Relationship between Law Enforcement Accreditation, Citizen Complaints, Civil Lawsuits, and Adverse Civil Judgments. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Northcentral University.
23.
GriswoldD (1994) Complaints against the police: Predicting dispositions. Journal of Criminal Justice22(3): 215.
24.
HassellKArchboldC (2010) Widening the scope on complaints of police misconduct. Policing33(3): 473–489.
25.
HassellKZhoaJMaguireE (2003) Structural arrangements in large municipal police organizations: Revisiting Wilson’s theory of local political culture. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 26(2): 231–250.
26.
HickmanM (2006) Citizen complaints about police use of force. Washington DC: US. Department of Justice. Available at: www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ccpuf.pdf(accessed 12 September 2016).
27.
HilbeJM (2011). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HoughRMSrTatumKM (2012) An examination of Florida policies on force continuums. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management35(1): 39–54.
29.
HouglandSMeslohC (2005) Reliability of risk management data in measuring police performance: An initial empirical analysis. Law Enforcement Executive Forum5(1): 45–51.
JohnsonR (1998) Citizen complaints. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin67(12): 1.
32.
KellingGMooreM (1988) The Evolving Strategy of Policing. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
33.
KellingGWycoffM (2001) The Evolving Strategy of Policing: Case Studies of Strategic Change. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
34.
KesslerD (1999) The effects of community policing on complaints against officers. Journal of Quantitative Criminology15(3): 333–372.
35.
LangerM (1995) A Descriptive and Exploratory Case Study of the Professionalization and Training Process of Law Enforcement Officers in Skokie, Illinois, 1962–1987. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Loyola University.
36.
LerschK (1998) Police misconduct and malpractice: a critical analysis of citizens’ complaints. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management21(1): 80–96.
LerschK (2002) Are citizen complaints just another measure of officer productivity? An analysis of citizen complaints and officer activity measures. Police Practice and Research3(2): 135–147.
39.
MaxfieldMBabbieE (2001) Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
40.
McCabeKFajardoR (2001) Law enforcement accreditation: A national comparison of accredited vs. nonaccredited agencies. Journal of Criminal Justice29(2): 127–131.
41.
PateAFridellLHamiltonE (1993) Police Use of Force: Official Reports, Citizen Complaints, and Legal Consequences. Volumes I and II. Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.
RojekJWagnerADeckerS (2001) Addressing police misconduct: The role of citizen complaints. Critical issues in policing: 317–337.
45.
SkolnickJFyfeJ (1994) Above the Law: Police and the Excessive Use of force. New York: Free Press.
46.
StevenGMeghanSJamesF (2001) Who are the complaint-prone officers? An examination of the relationship between police officers’ attributes, arrest activity, assignment, and citizens’ complaints about excessive force. Journal of Criminal Justice29, 521–529.
47.
SykesG (1994) Accreditation and community policing: Passing fads or basic reforms?Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice10(1): 1–16.
48.
TeodoroMHughesA (2012) Socializer or signal? How agency accreditation affects organizational culture. Public Administration Review72(4): 583–591.
49.
TrautmanN (1988) Law Enforcement – The Making of a Profession: A Comprehensive Guide for the Police to Achieve and Sustain Professionalism. Springfield, IL: Thomas Books.
50.
ValoriC (2000) Effects of Accreditation on the Office of the Sheriff on Complaints by Citizens. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Seton Hall University.
51.
VaughnMCooperWdel CarmenR (2001) Assessing legal liabilities in law enforcement police chief’s views. Crime and Delinquency47(1): 3–27.
52.
WalkerSBumphusV (1992) The effectiveness of civilian review: Observations on recent trends and new issues regarding the civilian review of the police. American Journal of Police11(4): 1–26.
53.
WalkerSMacdonaldM (2009) An alternative remedy for police misconduct: A model state ‘pattern or practice’ statute. Available at: http://civilrightslawjournal.com/issues/19.479.pdf(accessed 12 September 2016).
