Thailand initiated national drug intervention across 10 regional police jurisdictions in 2001. Despite the alleged overall success, its impact has not been explored with empirical data. This study examines monthly crime data from 1995 to 2008 using interrupted time series modelling. On average across all regions, the drug crime rate significantly dropped immediately following the initiation. However, its trajectory shows a regression to the pre-intervention level over the course of 60 months. Methodological limitations and policy implications are discussed.
AitkenCMooreDHiggsPKelsallJKergerM (2002) The impact of a police crackdown on a street drug scene: Evidence from the street. International Journal of Drug Policy13(3): 193–202.
2.
AnnanSOSkoganWG (1995) Drugs and Police Response: Survey of Public Housing Residents in Denver, Colorado, 1989–1990. Available at: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06482.v1
3.
BoxGEPJenkinsGM (1976) Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.
4.
BoxGEPTiaoGC (1975) Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association70(349): 70–79.
5.
BuergerM (1992) Defensive strategies of the street-level drug trade. Journal of Crime and Justice15(2): 31–51.
6.
Bureau of Justice Assistance (1993) Problem-Oriented Drug Enforcement: A Community-Based Approach for Effective Policing (Monograph). Available at: https://www.ncjrs.gov/txtfiles/problem.txt
7.
EckJWartellJ (1998) Improving the management of rental properties with drug problems. In: MazerolleLRoehlJ (eds) Crime Prevention Studies. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp.161–185.
8.
HakkarainenPTigerstedtCTammiT (2007) Dual-track drug policy: Normalization of the drug problem in Finland. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy14(6): 543–558.
9.
HopeT (1994) Problem-oriented policing and drug market locations: Three case studies. In: ClarkeR (ed.) Crime Prevention Studies. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
10.
KennedyD (1993) Closing the Market: Controlling the Drug Trade in Tampa, Florida, NIJ Program Focus. Washington, DC: US National Institute of Justice.
11.
KleimanMAR (1988) Crackdowns: The Effects of Intensive Enforcement on Retail Heroin Dealing. Working Paper #88-01-11. Cambridge, MA: Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management, John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University.
12.
KurlantzickJ (2002) Ran-goons: Why Isn’t Burma on Bush’s ‘Axis of Evil’ List?Washington Monthly, April, 38–41.
13.
LurigioAJDavisRCRegulusTAGwiasdaVEPopkinSJDantzkerMLSmithBOvelletL (1998) More effective place management: An evaluation of Cook County’s narcotics nuisance abatement unit. In: MazerolleLGRoehlJ (eds) Crime Prevention Studies. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp.187–217.
14.
ManskiCF (2003) Credible research practices to inform drug law enforcement. Criminology and Public Policy2(3): 534–556.
15.
MazerolleLSooleDWRomboutsS (2006) Street-level drug law enforcement: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Experimental Criminology2(4): 409–435.
16.
MazerolleLSooleDWRomboutsS (2007) Drug law enforcement: A review of the evaluation literature. Police Quarterly10(2): 115–153.
17.
MooreMH (1990) Supply reduction and drug law enforcement. Crime and Justice13: 109–157.
18.
MooreMHKleimanMAR (1989) The Police and Drugs: Perspectives on Policing. Washington, DC: U.S. National Institute of Justice.
19.
Office of the Narcotics Control Board [ONCB] (2000) Thailand Narcotics Annual Report 2000. Bangkok: Office of the Prime Minister.
20.
ONCB (2001) Thailand Narcotics Annual Report 2001. Bangkok: Office of the Prime Minister.
21.
ONCB (2002) Thailand Narcotics Annual Report 2002. Bangkok: Office of the Prime Minister.
22.
ONCB (2003) Thailand Narcotics Annual Report 2003. Bangkok: Office of the Prime Minister.
23.
PotterGGainesLHolbrookB (1990) Blowing smoke: An evaluation of marijuana eradication in Kentucky. American Journal of Police9(1): 97–116.
24.
San Diego Police Department (1998) Operation hot pipe, smoky haze and rehab: Disrupting an illicit drug market. Submission for the Herman Goldstein Award for Excellence in Problem-Oriented Policing.
25.
SmithR (2001) Police-led crackdowns and cleanups: An evaluation of a crime control initiative in Richmond, VA. Crime and Delinquency47(1): 60–83.
26.
SviridoffMSaddSCurtisRGrincR (1992) Neighborhood Effects of Street-level Drug Enforcement: An Evaluation of TNT. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
27.
WeisburdDGreenL (1995) Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly12(4): 711–735.
28.
WilsonJQ (1990) Drugs and crime. In: TonryMWilsonJQ (eds.) Drugs and Crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.521–545.
