CaveR (2012) Lawyers claim new policy causes miscarriages of justice. BBC News14 April. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17690404 (accessed 12 March 2015).
9.
ClarkeCMilneR (2001) National Evaluation of the PEACE Investigative Interviewing Course. London: Home Office.
10.
ClarkeCMilneR (in press) A national evaluation of PEACE interviewing: One decade later. In: WalshD. (eds) Contemporary Developments and Practices in Investigative Interviewing and Interrogation: An International Perspective. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 2–23.
11.
ClarkeCMilneRBullR (2011) Interviewing suspects of crime: The impact of PEACE training, supervision, and the presence of a legal advisor. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling8(2): 149–162.
12.
ClarkeCMilneRBullR (in prep.) Real life interview with victims and witnesses of crime: crime seriousness. Psychology, Public Policy and Law.
13.
ConnorsE. (1996) Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Justice.
14.
ConwayMA (2008) Guidelines on Memory and the Law: Recommendations From the Scientific Study of Human Memory. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
15.
CutlerB (2011) Conviction of The Innocent: Lessons from Psychological Research. Washington, DC: APA.
16.
DandoCWilcockRMilneR (2008) The cognitive interview: Inexperienced police officers’ perceptions of their witness/victim interviewing practices. Legal and Criminological Psychology13(1): 59–70.
17.
DrizinSALeoRA (2004) The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review82: 891–1007.
FisherHSir (1977) Report of an Inquiry by the Hon Sir Henry Fisher Into the Circumstances Leading to the Trial of Three Persons on Charges Arising Out of the Death of Maxwell Confait and the Fire at 27, Doggett Road, London SE6. London: HMSO.
21.
FisherRGeiselmanR (1992) Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
22.
ForstB (2013) Wrongful convictions in a world of miscarriages of justice. In: HuffCRKilliasM (eds) Wrongful Conviction and Miscarriages of Justice: Causes and Remedies in North American and European Criminal Justice Systems. London: Routledge, pp. 15–43.
23.
FrankJFrankB (1957) Not Guilty. New York: Doubleday.
24.
GabbertF. (in press) Communicating with witnesses: the role of initial witness accounts within the investigative process. In: OxburghG. (eds) Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts: A Handbook. Chichester: Wiley.
25.
GriffithsAMilneR (2006) Will it all end in tiers? Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In: WilliamsonT (ed.) Investigative Interviewing: Rights, Research and Regulation. Cullompton: Willan, pp. 167–189.
26.
GriffithsAMilneR (2008) Is omni-competence possible? Comparing skills of advanced interviewers in real life suspect and witness interviews. In: Third international investigative interviewing conference, Quebec, Canada, 3–5 September 2008.
27.
GriffithsA. (in prep.) Is omni-competence possible? A comparison of advanced witness and suspect interviews carried out by the same interviewers. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling.
28.
GroundsA (2004) Psychological consequences of wrongful conviction and imprisonment. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice46(2): 165–182.
29.
GudjonssonG (2003) The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions. Chichester: Wiley.
30.
HallA (1994) It couldn’t happen today? In: McConvilleMBridgesL (eds) Criminal Justice in Crisis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 313–321.
31.
HaselLKassinS (2009) On the presumption of evidentiary independence: can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications?Psychological Science20(1): 122–126.
HorryT. (2014) Archival analyses of eyewitness identification test outcomes: what can they tell us about eyewitness memory?Law and Human Behaviour38(1): 94–108.
34.
HuffRCKilliasM (eds) (2013) Wrongful Convictions and Miscarriages of Justice: Causes and Remedies in North American and European Criminal Justice Systems. London: Routledge.
35.
HuffCRRattnerASagarinE (1986) Guilty until proven innocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. Crime and Delinquency32(4): 518–544.
Justice Committee (2014) Justice Committee – Fourth Report. Joint Enterprise: Follow-up10 December. London: House of Commons.
38.
LeoRA (2005) Rethinking the study of miscarriages of justice: developing a criminology of wrongful conviction. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice21(3) 201–223.
39.
LeoRA (2010) From false confession to wrongful conviction: Seven psychological processes. Journal of Psychiatry and the Law38(1–2): 9–56.
40.
LeoRAOfsheR (2001) The truth about false confessions and advocacy scholarship. The Criminal Law Bulletin37(4): 293–370.
MartinDL (2002) The Police role in wrongful convictions: An international comparative study. In: HumphreyJAWesterveltSD (eds) Wrongly Convicted: Perspectives on Failed Justice. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 77–95.
43.
McLeanM (1995) Quality investigation? Police interviewing of witnesses. Medicine, Science and the Law35(2): 116–122.
44.
MilneRBullR (1999) Investigative Interviewing: Psychology and Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
45.
MilneRBullR (2006) Interviewing victims, including children and people with intellectual disabilities. In: KebbellMDaviesG (eds) Practical Psychology for Forensic Investigations. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 7–24.
46.
MilneRShawGBullR (2007) Investigative interviewing: The role of psychology. In: CarsonD. (eds) Applying Psychology to Criminal Justice. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 65–80.
47.
MilneR. (2010) Miscarriages of justice: What can we learn? In: AdlerJGrayJ (eds) Forensic Psychology: Concepts, Debates and Practice. Cullompton: Willan, pp. 17–37.
48.
MorrisRM (2007) History of criminal investigation. In: NewburnTWilliamsonTWrightA (eds) Handbook of Criminal Investigation. Cullompton: Willan, pp. 15–40.
49.
NaughtonM (2007) Rethinking Miscarriages of Justice: Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
NaughtonM (2014) Criminologizing wrongful convictions. British Journal of Criminology45(2): 165–182.
51.
NewportF (2012) The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion 2011. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
52.
O’BrienM (2009) The Death of Justice. London: Y Lolfa.
53.
O’NeilMMilneR (2014) Success within criminal investigations: Is communication still a key component? In BullR (ed.) Investigative Interviewing. New York: Springer, pp. 123–146.
54.
OxburghGDandoC (2011) Psychology and interviewing: what direction now in our quest for reliable information?British Journal of Forensic Practice13(2): 135–147.
55.
PhilipsCSir (1981) The Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure. Cmnd 8092. London: HMSO.
56.
PoyserS (2012) Calling for renewed media interest. In: RobinsJ (ed.) Wrongly Accused: Who Is Responsible for Investigating Miscarriages of Justice?London: Waterlow, pp. 46–50.
57.
PoyserSGrieveJ (forthcoming) Miscarriages of justice: What can we learn? In: MilneRGriffithsA (eds) Investigation: Psychology Into Practice. London: Routledge.
58.
PoyserSMilneR (2011) Miscarriages of justice: a call for continued research focussing on reforming the investigative process. British Journal of Forensic Practice13(2): 61–71.
59.
PoyserSNurseAMilneR (in prep.) Miscarriages of Justice. Bristol: Policy Press.
60.
PriceCCaplanJ (1977) The Confait Confessions. London: Marion Boyars.
61.
RadeletM (2013) Foreword. In: HuffRCKilliasM (eds) Wrongful Convictions and Miscarriages of Justice: Causes and Remedies in North American and European Criminal Justice Systems. London: Routledge, xv–xviii.
62.
RadinED (1964) The Innocents. New York: Morrow.
63.
RockF (2001) The genesis of a witness statement. Forensic Linguistics8(2): 44–72.
64.
Runciman, Viscount, of Doxford, CBE, FBA (1993) The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. Cm 2263. London: HMSO.
SavageSGrieveJPoyserS (2007) Putting wrongs to rights: campaigns against miscarriages of justice. Criminology and Criminal Justice7(1): 83–106.
67.
SavageSMilneR (2007) Miscarriages of justice: The role of the investigative process. In: NewburnTWilliamsonTWrightA (eds) Handbook of Criminal Investigation. Cullompton: Willan, pp. 610–627.
68.
ScheckBNeufeldPDwyerJ (2000) Actual Innocence: Five Days to Execution, and Other Dispatches From the Wrongly Convicted. New York: Doubleday.
ShepherdE (1993) Ethical interviewing. In: ShepherdE (ed.) Aspects of Police Interviewing: Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology. Leicester: BPS.
71.
ShepherdEGriffithsA (2013) Investigative Interviewing: The Conversation Management Approach. Oxford: OUP.
72.
ShepherdEMilneR (2006) Have you told the management about this? Bringing witness interviewing into the 21st century. In: Heaton-ArmstrongA. (eds) Witness Testimony: Psychological, Investigative, and Evidential Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 131–152.
SmithDJ (1983) Police and People in London: A Survey of Londoners. London: Policy Studies Institute.
75.
SoftleyP (1981) Police Interrogation: An Observational Study in Four Police Stations. Research Study No. 4. Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure. Cmnd 8092. London: HMSO.
76.
SoukaraS. (2009) What really happens in police interviews of suspects? Tactics and confessions. Psychology, Crime and Law15(6): 493–506.
77.
SteerD (1981) Uncovering Crime: The Police Role. Research Study No. 7. Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure. Cmnd 8092. London: HMSO.
78.
TaylorC (2005) Advance disclosure and the culture of the investigator: The good idea that never caught on?International Journal of the Sociology of Law33(2): 118–131.
WalkerC (1999) Miscarriages of justice in principle and practice. In: WalkerCStarmerK (eds) Miscarriages of justice: A Review of Justice in Error. London: Blackstone Press, pp. 31–62.
82.
WalkerCStarmerK (eds) (1999) Justice in Error. London: Blackstone Press.
83.
WalshDBullR (2010) What really is effective in interviews with suspects? A study comparing interviewing skills against interviewing outcomes. Legal and Criminal Psychology15(2): 305–21.
WesteraNKebbellMMilneR (2011) Interviewing witnesses: Will investigative and evidential requirements ever concord?British Journal of Forensic Practice13(2): 103–113.
88.
WilliamsonTMilneRSavageS (2009) International Developments in Investigative Interviewing. Devon: Willan.
89.
WrightRPowellM (2006) Investigative interviewers’ perceptions of their difficulty in adhering to open-ended questions with child witnesses. International Journal of Police Science and Management8(4): 316–325.
90.
YantM (1991) Presumed Guilty: When Innocent People Are Wrongly Convicted. New York: Prometheus.