Since the COVID-19 pandemic, tutoring has gained popularity as a strategy to improve the academic achievement of struggling students. Intensive, relationship-based tutoring is a highly effective academic support for many students. A range of tutoring approaches are available to accelerate young students’ literacy. Sarah Novicoff and Susanna Loeb discuss the research into early literacy tutoring and share the key elements found in effective programs.
BennettE.LeeM.LoebS.RobinsonC.D. (2024). Effects of high-impact tutoring on early literacy outcomes: A pilot study. National Student Support Accelerator.
2.
ChuD. (2021, October28). The case for K-2 testing. Flypaper by the Fordham Institute.
3.
CortesK.E.KortecampK.LoebS.RobinsonC.D. (2024). A scalable approach to high-impact tutoring for young readers: Results of a randomized controlled trial (EdWorking Paper No. 24-893). Annenberg Institute at Brown University.
4.
ElbaumB.VaughnS.Tejero HughesM.Watson MoodyS. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92 (4), 605-619.
5.
EricksonA.H.JacobR.AsherC. (2023, September12). An evaluation of the Reading Partners Tutoring Program. OSF Registries.
6.
GerstenR.HaymondK.Newman-GoncharR.DiminoJ.JayanthiM. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13 (2), 401-427.
7.
Groom-ThomasL.LeungC.LoebS.PollardC.WaymackN.WhiteS. (2023). Challenges and solutions: Scaling tutoring programs. Inter-American Development Bank.
8.
HernandezD.J. (2011). Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Annie E. Casey Foundation.
9.
HillC.J.BloomH.S.BlackA.R.LipseyM.W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2 (3), 172-177.
10.
JacobR.ArmstrongC.BowdenA.B.PanY. (2016). Leveraging volunteers: An experimental evaluation of a tutoring program for struggling readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9 (sup1), 67-92.
11.
JochimA.DaramolaE.J.PolikoffM. (2023). Teachers and tutors together: Reimagining literacy instruction in Oakland. Center for Reinventing Public Education.
12.
MarkovitzC.E.HernandezM.W.HedbergE.C.SilberglittB. (2014). Impact evaluation of the Minnesota Reading Corps K-3 program. Corporation for National and Community Service.
13.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2022). NAEP Reading, Grade 4. U.S. Department of Education.
14.
NeitzelA.J.LakeC.PellegriniM.SlavinR.E. (2022). A synthesis of quantitative research on programs for struggling readers in elementary schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 57 (1), 149-179.
15.
NickowA.OreopoulosP.QuanV. (2024). The promise of tutoring for preK-12 learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. American Educational Research Journal, 61 (1), 74-107.
16.
Pace MilesK.FletcherA. (2023). Improving vulnerable populations’ emergent reading outcomes by training preservice teachers in an evidence-based program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 37 (3), 442-462.
17.
Richards-TutorC.BakerD.L.GerstenR.BakerS.K.SmithJ.M. (2016). The effectiveness of reading interventions for English learners: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 82 (2), 144-169.
18.
RitterG.W.BarnettJ.H.DennyG.S.AlbinG.R. (2009). The effectiveness of volunteer tutoring programs for elementary and middle school students: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 79 (1), 3-38.
19.
RobinsonC.D.LoebS. (2021). High-impact tutoring: State of the research and priorities for future learning. National Student Support Accelerator.
20.
RobinsonC.D.PollardC.NovicoffS.WhiteS.LoebS. (2024). The effects of virtual tutoring on young readers: Results from a randomized controlled trial (EdWorkingPaper: 24-955). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University.
21.
ShieldsK.A.CookK.D.GrellerS. (2016). How kindergarten entry assessments are used in public schools and how they correlate with spring assessments (REL 2017-182). Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands.
22.
SlavinR.E.LakeC.DavisS.MaddenN.A. (2011). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6 (1), 1-26.
23.
SparksR.L.PattonJ.MurdochA. (2014). Early reading success and its relationship to reading achievement and reading volume: Replication of ‘10 years later.’Reading and Writing, 27 (1), 189-211.
24.
University of Oregon. (2020). 8th edition of Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) 2017-2019 percentiles (Technical Report 2001).
25.
University of Oregon. (2022). DIBELS 8th edition 2021-2022 percentiles (Technical Report 2201).
26.
University of Oregon. (2023) Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills: Administration and scoring guide (6th ed.).
