All elementary, secondary, and special education teachers in Massachusetts seeking initial licensure are required to earn a sheltered English immersion (SEI) endorsement. This endorsement is intended to prepare educators to support designated English learners (ELs) in the content areas. However, the course does not reflect current theories of language development or Massachusetts policies about models of second language education. Jennifer Altavilla-Giordano and Emily Blitz explain how they reimagined the course to accomplish three goals: 1) establish a critical stance to SEI instruction, 2) increase the self-efficacy of pre-service teachers, and 3) inspire advocacy on behalf of designated ELs and families.
An act relative to English language education in public schools, Mass. Acts 386. (2002).
2.
BaconC.K. (2018). “It’s not really my job”: A mixed methods framework for language ideologies, monolingualism, and teaching emergent bilingual learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 71 (2), 172–187.
3.
BalterA. (2022, May). The state of the state: Updates from the Office of Language Acquisition[PowerPoint slides]. MATSOL Conference, Framingham, MA.
4.
Chang-BaconC.K. (2022). Monolingual language ideologies and the Massachusetts sheltered English immersion endorsement initiative: A critical policy analysis. Educational Policy, 36 (3), 479–519.
5.
ColomboM.TigertJ.M.LeiderC.M. (2019). Positioning teachers, positioning learners: Why we should stop using the term English learners. TESOL Journal, 10 (2), e00432.
6.
CumminsJ. (1980). The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: Implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Quarterly, 175–187.
7.
de OliveiraL.C.AthanasesS.Z. (2007). Graduates’ reports of advocating for English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 202–215.
8.
FarrellyR. (2022, August). If we must label language learners: EL vs. MLL. TESOL Connections.
9.
FloresN. (2020). From academic language to language architecture: Challenging raciolinguistic ideologies in research and practice. Theory into Practice, 59 (1), 22–31.
10.
GándaraP.SantibañezL. (2016). The teachers our English language learners need. Educational Leadership, 73 (5), 32–37.
11.
GarcíaO. (2009). Emergent bilinguals and TESOL: What’s in a name?TESOL Quarterly, 43 (2), 322–326.
12.
GarcíaO.JohnsonS.I.SeltzerK. (2017). The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for learning. Caslon.
13.
GortM.GlennW.J.SettlageJ. (2010). Toward culturally and linguistically responsive teacher education: The impact of a faculty learning community on two teacher educators. In LucasT. (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms (pp. 198-214). Routledge.
14.
HarperC.De JongE. (2004). Misconceptions about teaching English‐language learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48 (2), 152–162.
15.
KiblerA.K.RomanD. (2013). Insights into professional development for teachers of English language learners: A focus on using students’ native languages in the classroom. Bilingual Research Journal, 36 (2), 187–207.
16.
LiuK. (2015). Critical reflection as a framework for transformative learning in teacher education. Educational Review, 67, 135–157.
17.
LucasT.VillegasA.M. (2013). Preparing linguistically responsive teachers: Laying the foundation in preservice teacher education. Theory into Practice, 52 (2), 98–109.
18.
MartínezR.A. (2018). Beyond the English learner label: Recognizing the richness of bi/multilingual students’ linguistic repertoires. The Reading Teacher, 71 (5), 515–522.
19.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2013). Massachusetts sheltered English instruction teacher endorsement course: Participant’s manual.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (2022) Guidance on English learner education services and programming. www.doe.mass.edu/ele/guidance
22.
MolleD. (2013). The pitfalls of focusing on instructional strategies in professional development for teachers of English learners. Teacher Education Quarterly, 40 (1), 101–124.
23.
OsmanD.J.WarnerJ.R. (2020). Measuring teacher motivation: The missing link between professional development and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 1–11.
24.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41 (3), 93–97.
25.
PennycookA. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
RafaA.ErwinB.BrixeyE.McCannM.PerezZ. (2020). 50-State comparison: English learner policies. Education Commission of the States.
27.
RubioJ. (2022). Educational language policy in Massachusetts: Discourses of the LOOK Act. Educational Policy, 36 (6), 1440–1463.
28.
Solano-FloresG. (2016). Assessing English language learners: Theory and practice. Routledge.
29.
SugimotoA.T.CarterK.StoehrK.J. (2017). Teaching “in their best interest”: Preservice teachers’ narratives regarding English learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 179–188.
30.
ThiersN. (2022). Juliana Urtubey on seeing families through a lens of gratitude. Educational Leadership, 80 (1).
31.
United States Department of Justice. (2011, 27September). Massachusetts takes steps to require sheltered English immersion training in response to Justice Department’s letter [Press release].
32.
ValdésG. (2018). Analyzing the curricularization of language in two-way immersion education: Restating two cautionary notes. Bilingual Research Journal, 41 (4), 388–412.
33.
YoonB. (2008). Uninvited guests: The influence of teachers’ roles and pedagogies on the positioning of English language learners in the regular classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 45 (2), 495–522.
34.
ZwiersJ. (2004). The third language of academic English. Educational Leadership, 62 (4), 60–63.
