Principal supervisors often find themselves drawn into managing logistical and operational matters, instead of helping principals become more effective instructional leaders. Yet Meredith Honig and Lydia Rainey contend that principal supervisors need to make principals’ instructional leadership their primary focus. Drawing on their work with central offices, they explain how the principal supervisors who were most effective at promoting equity and improved instruction took a teaching-and-learning approach to their work with principals. They helped principals lead their own learning and used modeling and other instructional moves to help them along the way.
BrownJ.CollinsA.DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32–42.
2.
HonigM.I. (2012). District central office leadership as teaching: How central office administrators support principals’ development as instructional leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48 (4), 733–744.
3.
HonigM.RaineyL. (2014). Central office leadership in professional learning communities: The practice beneath the policy. Teachers College Record, 116 (4), 1–48.
4.
HonigM.RaineyL. (2019). Supporting principal supervisors: What really matters?Journal of Educational Administration, 57 (5), 445–462.
5.
HonigM.RaineyL. (2020). Supervising principals for instructional leadership: A teaching and learning approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
6.
HonigM.I.VenkateswaranN.McNeilP. (2017). Research use as learning: The case of fundamental change in school district central offices. American Educational Research Journal, 54 (5), 938–971.
7.
LaveJ. (1998). Cognition in practice: Mind, culture, and mathematics in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
