Wealthy parents in public school districts across the country are engaged in elaborate fund-raising efforts to improve the quality of education in their children’s schools, giving them an advantage over families in schools without the same level of access to external resources. Through evaluating parent responses to district policies that address school charitable funding inequities, Brittany Murray sheds light on political challenges facing equity-minded school districts as they attempt to equalize parent charitable donations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrownC.SargradS.BennerM. (2017, April8). Hidden money: The outsized role of parent contributions in school finance. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
2.
BrykA.S.SebringP.B.AllensworthE.EastonJ.Q.LuppescuS. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BuiL. (2013, August11). Montgomery examines fairness of private funding for school projects. The Washington Post.
4.
DillonS. (2003, May24). Out of money, some school districts in Oregon end the year early.New York Times.
5.
EpsteinJ.L. (2010). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 92 (3), 81–96.
6.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (2015).
7.
FriedmanJ. (2011, November18). Live blog: Districtwide fund-raising hearing.Malibu Patch.
8.
GoldsteinD. (2018, January20). PTA gift for someone else’s child? A touchy subject in California. The New York Times.
HorvatE.M.WeiningerE.B.LareauA. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40 (2), 319–351.
11.
HouckE.A. (2008). County funding versus municipal aspiration: A case study. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 11 (1), 81–86.
12.
LareauA. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
13.
LeeV.BrykA.SmithJ. (1993). The organization of effective secondary schools. Review of Research in Education, 19, 171–267.
14.
LewisA.E.DiamondJ.B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford, England, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
Lewis-McCoyR.H. (2014). Inequality in the promised land: Race, resources, and suburban schooling. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
ManningR. (2015, May11). Parent fundraising fills holes, creates gaps in Portland schools. Oregon Public Broadcasting.
17.
McKennaL. (2016, January28). How rich parents can exacerbate school inequality. The Atlantic.
18.
MurrayB.DominaT.PettsA.RenzulliL. (2018). We’re in this together: Bridging and bonding social capital in elementary school PTOs. Manuscript submitted for publication.
19.
MurrayB.DominaT.RenzulliL.BoylanR. (in press). Civil society goes to school: Parent teacher associations and the equality of educational opportunity.RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.
20.
NelsonA.A.GazleyB. (2014). The rise of school-supporting nonprofits. Education Finance and Policy, 9 (4), 541–566.
Posey-MaddoxL. (2014). When middle-class parents choose urban schools: Class, race, and the challenge of equity in public education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
PriceJ. (2000, April28). Panelists hash out ABCs of spending Cary town money on schools. The News & Observer, pp. B3.
24.
ReevesR.V. (2017). Dream hoarders: How the American upper middle class is leaving everyone else in the dust, why that is a problem, and what to do about it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
