Results on the National Assessment for Education Progress and the Program for International Student Assessment show that high school mathematics instruction is past due for a redesign. Despite calls for reform going back at least four decades, the structure of math instruction has remained largely the same. In April 2018, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics released Catalyzing Change in High School Mathematics: Initiating Critical Conversations to promote discussion of the changes needed. Robert Berry and Matthew Larson, current and past presidents of NCTM, describe the arguments within this report, asserting that the math curriculum needs to help students understand the mathematics that’s part of daily life, that tracking of students and teachers should be abandoned, that instruction should involve all students as doers of math, and that all students should experience a common curriculum.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BostonM.DillonF.SmithM.S.MillerS. (2017). Taking action: Implementing effective mathematics teaching practices grades 9–12. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
2.
BreliasA. (2015). Mathematics for what?High school students reflect on mathematics as a tool for social inquiry. Democracy & Education, 23 (1), 1–11.
3.
DeerB. (2011). How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed. BMJ, 342, 77–82.
4.
DosseyJ.A.McCroneS.S.HalvorsenK T. (2016). Mathematics education in the United States, 2016: A capsule summary fact book. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
5.
FranklinC.BargagliottiA.CaseC.KaderG.SchaefferR.SpanglerD. (2015). The statistical education of teachers. Arlington, VA: American Statistical Association.
6.
FranklinC.KaderG.MewbornD.MorenoJ.PeckR.PerryM.ScheafferR. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE Report): A pre-K–12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
7.
GarfunkelS.MontgomeryM. (Eds.). (2016). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in mathematical modeling education (GAIMME). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications and Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
8.
GoffneyI. (2018). Where do we go from here? Next steps in rehumanizing mathematics for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students. In GutiérrezR.GoffneyI.BostonM. (Eds.), Annual perspectives in mathematics. education 2018: Rehumanizing mathematics for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students (pp. 159–170). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
9.
GoodmanM.J.SandsA.M.ColeyR.J. (2015). America’s skills challenge: Millennials and the future. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
10.
GutiérrezR. (2002). Beyond essentialism: The complexity of language in teaching mathematics to Latina/o students. American Educational Research Journal, 39 (4), 1047–1088.
11.
HackerA. (2016). The math myth and other STEM delusions. New York, NY: New Press.
12.
KavanaghJ.RichM.D. (2018). Truth decay: An initial exploration of the diminishing role of facts and analysis in American public life. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
13.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The nation’s report card: 2015 mathematics and reading at grades 4 and 8 (NCES 2015-136). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
14.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). 2015: Mathematics & reading, grade 12. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
15.
National Center on Education and the Economy. (2013). What does it really mean to be college and work ready? The mathematics and English literacy required of first-year community college students. Washington, DC: Author.
16.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
17.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). An agenda for action: Recommendations for school mathematics of the 1980s. Reston, VA: Author.
18.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
19.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
20.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
21.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2018). Catalyzing change in high school mathematics: Initiating critical conversations. Reston, VA: Author.
22.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
23.
OliveJ.K.HotezP.J.DamaniaA.NolanM.S. (2018). The state of the antivaccine movement in the United States: A focused examination of nonmedical exemptions in states and counties. PLOS Medicine, 15 (6), e1002578.
24.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results (volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: Author.
25.
SaxeK.BraddyL. (2015). A common vision for undergraduate mathematical sciences programs in 2015. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
26.
St. JohnM.FullerK.A.HoughtonN.TambeP.EvansT. (2004). Gridlock: A study of high schools using research-based curricula to improve mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Inverness Research Associates.
27.
StrutchensM.E.QuanderJ.R.GutiérrezR. (2011). Mathematical learning communities that foster reasoning and sense making for all high school students. In StrutchensM.E.QuanderJ.R. (Eds.), Focus in high school mathematics: Fostering reasoning and sense making (pp. 101–113). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
28.
SuF. (2017, January 6). Mathematics for human flourishing. Presidential Address, AMS-MAA Joint Math Meetings, Atlanta.
29.
TateW.F. (2013). Race, retrenchment, and the reform of school mathematics. In GutsteinE.PetersonB. (Eds.), Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (2nd ed., pp. 42–51). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
30.
TaylorL.E.SwerdfegerA.L.EslickG.D. (2014). Vaccines are not associated with autism: An evidence-based meta-analysis of case control and cohort studies. Vaccine, 32 (19), 3623–3629.
31.
WagerA.A.StinsonD.W. (2012). A sojourn into the empowering uncertainties of teaching and learning mathematics for social change. In WagerA.StinsonD. (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: Conversations with educators (pp. 3–18). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
