As information is becoming easier to access and harder to evaluate, literacy teachers face new challenges in helping students become astute independent readers. Building on the ideas of Lewis Mumford, the authors argue for embracing the role of the generalist — or “expert information seeker” who is able to identify and evaluate different types of sources and who trusts experts’ knowledge without accepting every statement they make as absolute truth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrightJ. (2016, 1118). The #election2016 micro-propaganda machine. Medium.
2.
BrommeR.GoldmanS.R. (2014). The public’s bounded understanding of science. Educational Psychologist, 49 (2), 59–69.
3.
CoiroJ.KnobelM.LankshearM.LeuD.J. (Eds). (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
4.
DyerJ. (2017, 414). Can news literacy be taught?Nieman Reports.
5.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
6.
GeeJ. P. (2017). Teaching, learning, literacy in our high-risk high-tech world: A framework for becoming human. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
7.
HarrisT. (2016, 519).How technology hijacks people’s minds: From a magician and Google’s design ethicist. Fromwww.tristanharris.com
8.
HobbsR. (1998). The seven great debates in the media literacy movement. Journal of Communication, 48 (2), 9–29.
9.
LynchM.P. (2016). The internet of us: Knowing more and understanding less in the age of big data. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing.
10.
MojeE.G. (2015). Doing disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Educational Review, 85 (2), 254–278.
11.
MooreM. (2011, 33). Churnalism exposed: A new website identifies press release copy in the news. Columbia Journalism Review.
12.
MumfordL. (1966). Speculations on prehistory. The American Scholar, 36 (1), 43–53.
13.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66 (1), 60–92.
14.
NicholsT. (2017). The death of expertise: The campaign against established knowledge and why it matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
PEN America. (2017). Faking news: Fraudulent news and the fight for the truth. New York, NY: Author.
16.
ThommE.BrommeR. (2012). ‘It should at least seem scientific!’: Textual features of ‘scientificness’ and their impact on lay assessments of online information. Science Education, 96 (2), 187–211.
17.
VelshiA. (2017). In an age of “alternative facts,” how do we know what’s true?The TED Radio Hour. National Public Radio.
18.
WilliamsA.T. (2016, 927). Employment picture darkens for journalists at digital outlets. Columbia Journalism Review.
