To ensure that schools enjoy a steady supply of competent and committed teachers, federal, state, and local policymakers should look to the extensive research literature in this area, focusing on five strategies in particular: strengthening teacher preparation, improving hiring practices, increasing compensation, providing support for new teachers, and improving working conditions (with particular attention to school leadership, professional collaboration and shared decision making, and resources for teaching and learning).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsonF.Darling-HammondL. (2011). Speaking of salaries: What it will take to get qualified, effective teachers in all communities. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
2.
AllegrettoS.A.MishelL. (2016). The teacher pay gap is wider than ever: Teachers’ pay continues to fall further behind pay of comparable workers. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
3.
BakerB.SciarraD.G.FarrieD. (2015). Is school funding fair? A national report card. Newark, NJ: Education Law Center.
4.
BookerK.GlazermanS. (2009). Effects of the Missouri Career Ladder Program on teacher mobility. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
5.
BormanG.D.DowlingN.M. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78 (3), 367–409.
6.
BuckleyJ.SchneiderM.ShangY. (2004). The effects of school facility quality on teacher retention in urban school districts. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
7.
CarrollT.G. (2007). The high cost of teacher turnover. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future.
8.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
9.
GoldringR.TaieS.RiddlesM.OwensC. (2014). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2012-13 Teacher Follow-up Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
10.
HendricksM.D. (2014). Does it pay to pay teachers more? Evidence from Texas.Journal of Public Economics,109, 50–63.
11.
HenryG.T.BastianK.C.SmithA.A. (2012). Scholarships to recruit the “best and brightest” into teaching: Who is recruited, where do they teach, how effective are they, and how long do they stay?Educational Researcher, 41 (3), 83–92.
12.
IngersollR.MerrillL.MayH. (2014). What are the effects of teacher education and preparation on beginning teacher attrition? Research Report (#RR-82). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
13.
IngersollR.StrongM. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research,81 (2), 201–233.
14.
JohnsonS.M.KraftM.A.PapayJ.P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement.Teachers College Record,114 (10), 1–39.
15.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2013). Schools and staffing survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
16.
SutcherL.Darling-HammondL.Carver-ThomasD. (2016). A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U.S. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
17.
TheobaldN.D. (1990). An examination of the influence of personal, professional, and school district characteristics on public school teacher retention. Economics of Education Review, 9 (3), 241–250.
18.
VillarA.StrongM. (2007). Is mentoring worth the money? A benefit-cost analysis and five-year rate of return of a comprehensive mentoring program for beginning teachers. Education Research Service Spectrum Journal of Research and Information, 25 (3), 1–17.
