Rigorous DAP (developmentally appropriate practices) is a set of 11 principles of instruction intended to help close early childhood learning gaps. Academically rigorous learning environments create the conditions for children to learn at high levels. While academic rigor focuses on one dimension of education -- academic -- DAP considers the whole landscape of learning -- motivational, cultural, socioemotional as well as cognitive. Combined, Rigorous DAP calls for early childhood educators teach the knowledge and skills they expect all their children to eventually attain and demonstrate on a regular basis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BonawitzE.ShaftoP.GweonH.GoodmanN.D.SpelkeE.SchulzL. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120, 322–330.
2.
BowmanB.T.DonovanM.S.BurnsM.S. (2000). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
3.
CoppleC.BredekampS. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
4.
DuncanG.J.DowsettC.J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA.C.KlebanovP.
…
DuckworthK. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446.
5.
EpsteinA.S. (2007). The intentional teacher: Choosing the best strategies for young children’s learning. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
6.
GmitrováV.GmitrovJ. (2003). The impact of teacher-directed and child-directed pretend play on cognitive competence in kindergarten children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30 (4), 241–246.
7.
GutmanL.M.SameroffA.J.ColeR. (2003). Academic growth curve trajectories from 1st grade to 12th grade: Effects of multiple social risk factors and preschool child factors. Developmental Psychology, 39, 777–790.
8.
HatchJ.A. (2002, February). Accountability shovedown: Resisting the standards movement in early childhood education. Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (6), 457–463.
9.
HowesC.BurchinalM.PiantaR.BryantD.EarlyD.CliffordR.BarbarinO. (2008). Ready to learn? Children’s preacademic achievement in prekindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 27–50.
10.
LeongD.J.BodrovaE. (2012). Assessing and scaffolding make-believe play. Young Children, 67, 28–34.
11.
MoatsL.C. (2009). Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 379–399.
12.
National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13.
PalermoF.HanishL.D.MartinC.L.FabesR.A.ReiserM. (2007). Preschoolers’ academic readiness: What role does the teacher-child relationship play?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 407–422.
14.
ReynoldsA.J.TempleJ.A.OuS.ArteagaI.A.WhiteB.A.B. (2011, July 15). School-based early childhood education and age-28 well-being: Effects by timing, dosage, and subgroups. Science, 333 (6040), 360–364.
15.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
SingerD.GolinkoffR.Hirsh-PasekK. (2006). Play = learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17.
SmutnyJ.F.von FremdS.E. (2004). Differentiating for the young child: Teaching strategies across the content areas (K-3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
18.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
WashorE.MojkowskiC. (2006, December). What do you mean by rigor?Educational Leadership, 64 (4), 84–87.
