Teachers can increase all-important student engagement by being aware of its affective, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrophyJ.GoodT. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 328–375). New York, NY: MacMillan.
2.
BrozoW.G.ShielG.ToppingK. (2008). Engagement in reading: Lessons learned from three PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51, 304–315.
3.
FredricksJ. (2013). Behavior engagement in learning. In HattieJ.AndermanE.M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 42–44). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
FredricksJ.A.BlumenfeldP.C.ParisA.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
5.
FredricksJ.A.McColskeyW. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). New York, NY: Springer.
6.
GuthrieJ.T.WigfieldA. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In KamilM.L.MosenthalP.PearsonP.D.BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
KirschI.de JongJ.LafontaineD.McQueenJ.MendelovitsJ.MonseurC. (2002). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries.Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
8.
MalloyJ.A.ParsonsS.A.ParsonsA.W. (2013). Methods for evaluating literacy engagement as a fluid construct. 62nd Yearbook of the Literacy Research Association, 124–139.
9.
PerryN.E.PhillipsL.DowlerJ. (2004). Examining features of tasks and their potential to promote self-regulated learning. Teachers College Record, 106, 1854–1878.
10.
PerryN.E.TurnerJ.C.MeyerD.K. (2006). Classrooms as contexts for motivating learning. In AlexanderP.A.WinneP.H. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 327–348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
PressleyM. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
12.
SkinnerE.A.BelmontM.J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85 (4), 571–581.
13.
SkinnerE.A.KindermannT.A.FurrerC. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525.
14.
SkinnerE.A.PitzerJ.R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). New York, NY: Springer.
15.
WigfieldA.GuthrieJ.T.PerencevichK.C.TaboadaA.KlaudaS.L.McRaeA.BarbosaP. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 432–445.
