Telling students to study simply because they must or making narrow pitches to a subject's future utility typically fail to generate student interest.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlumenfeldP.C.KemplerT.M.KrajcikJ.S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In SawyerR.K. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 475–488). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BrophyJ. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation for particular learning domains and activities. Educational Psychologist, 34 (2), 75–85.
3.
CooperK.S. (in press). Eliciting engagement in the high school classroom: A mixed-methods examination of teaching practices. American Educational Research Journal..
4.
EcclesJ.S. (2005). Subjective task values and the Eccles et al. model of achievement related choices. In ElliotA.J.DweckC.S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
National Educational Association. (1894). Report of the Committee of Ten on secondary school studies. New York, NY: American Book Co.
6.
National Research Council. (2003). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students' motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
7.
SchrawG.LehmanS. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (1), 23–52.
