Educators have been looking in all the wrong places for answers to school improvement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AinsworthL. (2003). Power standards: Identifying the standards that matter most.Englewood, CO: Lead + Learn Press.
2.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (3), 261–271.
3.
AndermanE.M.MaehrM.L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64 (2), 287–309.
4.
BalfanzR. (2009). Putting middle grades students on the graduation path: A policy and practice brief.Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.
5.
BerginC.BerginD. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 141–170.
6.
BromleyK. (2007). Nine things every teacher should know about words and vocabulary instruction. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50 (7), 528–537.
7.
California Safe Schools Coalition. (2013). Safe schools research brief #7: School safety and academic achievement.San Francisco, CA: Author. www.casafeschools.org/FactSheet7final.pdf.
DuncanG.J.DowsettC.J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA.C.KlebanovP.PaganiL.S.FeinsteinL.EngelM.Brooks-GunnJ.SextonH.DuckworthK.JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43 (6), 1428–1446.
15.
DurlakJ.A.WeissbergR.P.DymnickiA.B.TaylorR.D.SchellingerK.B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82 (1), 405–432. Also see research housed at: www.casel.org/library/2014/1/29/meta-analysis-of-school-based-universal-interventions.
16.
FuchsL.S.FuchsD.HospM.K.JenkinsJ.R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5 (3), 239–256.
17.
FurcoA.RootS. (2010). Research demonstrates the value of service learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 91 (5), 16–20.
HunleyS.A.DaviesS.C.MillerC.R. (2013). The relationship between curriculum-based measures in oral reading fluency and high-stakes tests for 7th-grade students. Research in Middle Level Education, 36 (5), 1–8.
20.
International Reading Association. (IRA). (1998). Phonemic awareness and the teaching of reading: A position statement from the board of directors. Newark, DE: Author.
21.
JordanN.C.KaplanD.LocuniakM.N.RamineniC. (2007). Predicting 1st-grade math achievement from number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22 (1), 36–46.
22.
KamilM.L.BormanG.D.DoleJ.KralC.C.SalingerT.TorgesenJ. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.
23.
KennellyL.MonradM. (2007). Approaches to dropout prevention: Heeding early warning signs with appropriate interventions. Washington, DC: National High School Center at the American Institutes for Research. www.betterhighschools.org/pubs/usergd_dr.asp.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (1995). Extracurricular participation and student engagement.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, NCES. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs95/web/95741.asp.
30.
National Center on Response to Intervention. (2013, January). Screening briefs series-Brief #3: Predicting students at risk for reading and mathematics difficulties.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention. http://www.rti4success.org/sites/default/files/RTI%20Screening%20Brief3-Predicting%20Students.pdf.
31.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards.Washington, DC: Authors.
32.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00–4769).Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
RosenJ.A.GlennieE.J.DaltonB.W.LennonJ.M.BozickR.N. (2010). Noncognitive skills in the classroom: New perspectives on educational research. RTI Press publication No. BK-0004-1009.Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.
35.
SchmokerM. (2007). Reading, writing, and thinking for all. Educational Leadership, 64 (7), 63–66.
36.
SieglerR.S.DuncanG.J.Davis-KeanP.E.DuckworthK.ClaessensA.EngelM.SusperreguyM.I.ChenM. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23 (7), 691–697.
StigginsR.J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (10), 758–765.
39.
TorgesenJ.K.MathesP.G. (1998). What every teacher should know about phonological awareness.Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education. www.fldoe.org/ese/pdf/phon9872.pdf.
40.
WigginsG.McTigheJ. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
41.
ZumetaR.O.ComptonD.L.FuchsL.S. (2012). Using word identification fluency to monitor 1st-grade reading development. Exceptional Child, 78 (2), 201–220.