Charter Schools and the Risk of Increased Segregation

Abstract

Charter schools, on average, don't have an academic advantage over traditional public schools, but they do have a significant risk of leading to more segregation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arcia

(2006). A test of the segregation premise: Comparison of enrollment percentages of charter and noncharter schools in a large urban school district. Journal of School Choice, 1, 33–45.

Arenas

(2004). Privatization and vouchers in Columbia and Chile. International Review of Education, 50, 379–395.

Bifulco

& Ladd

H.F.

(2007). School choice, racial segregation, and test-score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina's charter school program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 31–56.

Bifulco

Ladd

H.F.

, & Ross

(2008). Public school choice and integration: Evidence from Durham, North Carolina [Working Paper 14]. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.

Böhlmark

& Lindahl

(2007). The impact of school choice on pupil achievement, segregation and costs: Swedish evidence [Discussion Paper No. 2786]. Bonn, Germany: IZA. ftp://ftp.iza.org/SSRN/pdf/dp2786.pdf.

Booker

Zimmer

, & Buddin

(2005). The effects of charter schools on school peer composition. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR306 Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

Bunka

(2011). Economic segregation and charter school accessibility. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology 48, 281–301.

Burgess

Wilson

, & Lupton

(2005). Parallel lives? Ethnic segregation in schools and neighborhoods. Urban Studies, 42, 1027–1056.

Cavanaugh

(2010). Race to the Top now faces acid test: Winners brace for challenge of putting $4 billion to use. Education Week. www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/09/01/02rtt_ep.h30.html?r=1525908369.

10.

Clotfelter

C.T.

Ladd

H.F.

, & Vigdor

J.L.

(2013). Racial and economic diversity in North Carolina's schools: An update. Durham, NC: Duke Sanford School of Public Policy.

11.

Cobb

C.D.

& Glass

G.V.

(2003). Arizona charter schools: Resegregating public education? Chicago, IL: American Educational Research Association.

12.

Contini

& Scagni

(2010). Inequality of opportunity in secondary school enrolment in Italy, Germany and the Netherlands. Quality and Quantity 45, 441–464.

13.

Duncan

(2013, April 30). Choosing the right battles: Remarks and a conversation. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. www.ed.gov/news/speeches/choosing-right-battles-remarks-and-conversation.

14.

Eckes

S.E.

Fox

R.A.

, & Buchanan

N.K.

(2011). Legal and policy issues regarding niche charter schools: Race, religion, culture, and the law. Journal of School Choice, 5 (1), 85–110.

15.

Elacqua

(2012). The impact of school choice and public policy on segregation: Evidence from Chile. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 444–453.

16.

Frankenberg

Siegel-Hawley

, & Wang

(2011). Choice without equity: Charter school segregation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19 (1). http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/779.

17.

Furgeson

Gill

Haimson

Killewald

McCullough

Nichols-Barrer

Lake

(2012). Charter school management organizations: Diverse strategies and diverse student impacts (Updated ed.). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

18.

Garcia

D.R.

(2008). Academic and racial segregation in charter schools: Do parents sort students into specialized charter schools? Education and Urban Society, 40, 590–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124508316044.

19.

Gill

Timpane

P.M.

Ross

K.E.

Brewer

D.J.

, & Booker

(2007). Rhetoric versus reality: What we know and what we need to know about vouchers and charter schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

20.

Gleason

Clark

Tuttle

C.C.

, & Dwoyer

(2010). The evaluation of charter school impacts: Final report [NCEE 2010-4029]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

21.

Glenn

W.J.

(2011). A quantitative analysis of the increase in public school segregation in Delaware: 1989-2006. Urban Education, 46, 719–740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042085911400321.

22.

Gulosino

& d'Entremont

(2011). Circles of influence: An analysis of charter school location and racial patterns at varying demographic scales. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19 (8). http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/842.

23.

Heilig

J.V.

Williams

McNeil

L.M.

, & Lee

(2011). Is choice a panacea? An analysis of black secondary student attrition from KIPP, other private charters, and urban districts. Berkeley Review of Education, 2, 153–178. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0vs9d4fr.

24.

Institute on Race and Poverty. (2008). Failed promises: Assessing charter schools in the Twin Cities. Minneapolis, MN: Author.

25.

Jacobs

(2011). Understanding school choice: Location as a determinant of charter school racial, economic, and linguistic segregation. Education and Urban Society, 45, 459–482.

26.

Jarvis

& Alvanides

(2008). School choice from a household resource perspective: Preliminary findings from a north of England case study. Community, Work and Family, 11, 385–403.

27.

Johnston

Burgess

Wilson

, & Harris

(2007). School and residential ethnic segregation: An analysis of variations across England's local education authorities. Regional Studies, 40, 973–990.

28.

Kahlenberg

& Potter

(2012). Diverse charter schools: Can racial and socioeconomic integration promote better outcomes for students? Washington, DC: Poverty and Race Research Action Council.

29.

Karsten

Felix

Ledoux

, & Meijnen

(2006). Choosing segregation or integration? The extent and effects of ethnic segregation in Dutch cities. Education and Urban Society, 38, 228–247.

30.

Karsten

Ledoux

Roeleveld

Felix

, & Elshof

(2003). School choice and ethnic segregation. Education Policy, 17, 452–477.

31.

Landauer-Menchik

(2006). How segregated are Michigan's schools: Changes in enrollment from 1992-93 to 2004-05. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Education Policy Center.

32.

Lubienski

& Weitzel

(2009). Choice, integration, and educational opportunity: Evidence on competitive incentives for student sorting in charter schools. Journal of Gender, Race, & Justice, 11, 351–376.

33.

Luke

(2010). Australia: The challenges of poverty, pedagogy, and pathways. In Rotberg

I.C.

(Ed.), Balancing change and tradition in global education reform (2nd ed.). Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

34.

Michelson

R.A.

Bottia

, & Southworth

(2008). School choice and segregation by race, class, and achievement. Charlotte, NC: Education Policy Research Unit and Education and the Public Interest Center.

35.

Miron

Urschel

J.L.

Mathis

W.J.

, & Tornquist

(2010). Schools without diversity: Education management organizations, charter schools and the demographic stratification of the American school system. Boulder, CO & Tempe, AZ: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit.

36.

Nathanson

Corcoran

, & Baker-Smith

(2013). High school choice in New York City: A report on the school choices and placements of low-achieving students. New York, NY: Research Alliance for New York City Schools. http://media.ranycs.org/2013/008.

37.

National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2013a). Total number of schools, 2012-2013 national data. Washington, DC: Author. http://dashboard.publiccharters.org/dashboard/schools/page/overview/year/2013.

38.

National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2013b). Schools by geographic locale, 2010-2011 national data. Washington, DC: Author. http://dashboard.publiccharters.org/dashboard/schools/page/locale/year/2011.

39.

National Conference of State Legislatures. (2013). School voucher laws: State by state comparison. Denver, CO: Author. www.ncsl.org/issues-research/educ/voucher-law-comparison.aspx.

40.

(2007). Are charter schools more racially segregated than traditional public schools? [Policy Report 30]. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Education Policy Center. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED498628.pdf.

41.

Nir

Inbar

, & Eyal

(2010). Israel: Equity and competition in the grip of centralized bureaucracy. In Rotberg

I.C.

(Ed.), Balancing change and tradition in global education reform (2nd ed.). Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

42.

Olszweski-Kubilius

& Clarenbach

(2012). Unlocking emergent talent: Supporting high achievement of low-income, high-ability students. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children. www.nagc.org/uploadedFiles/Conventions_and_Seminars/National_Research_Summit/Unlocking%20Emergent%20Talent%20FULL%20No-Tint.pdf.

43.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background. Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Volume II). Paris, France: Author. www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/48852584.pdf.

44.

Ozek

(2011). Public school choice in the District of Columbia: A descriptive analysis [Policy Brief 13]. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.

45.

Pietsch

& Stubbe

T.C.

(2007). Inequality in the transition from primary to secondary school: School choice and educational disparities in Germany. European Educational Research Journal, 6, 424–445.

46.

Povich

E.S.

(2013). Tax dollars for private school tuition gain In states. StateLine. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.

47.

Rangvid

B.S.

(2007). Living and learning separately? Ethnic segregation of school children in Copenhagen. Urban Studies, 44, 1329–1354.

48.

Reardon

S.F.

(2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In Murnane

& Duncan

(Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality and the uncertain life chances of low-income children. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Press.

49.

Renzulli

L.A.

& Evans

(2005). School choice, charter schools, and white flight. Social Problems, 52, 398–418.

50.

Ritter

Jensen

Kisida

, & McGee

(2010). A closer look at charter schools and segregation: Flawed comparisons lead to overstated conclusions. Education Next, 10 (3), 69–73. http://educationnext.org/a-closer-look-at-charter-schools-and-segregation/.

51.

Roda

& Wells

A.S.

(2013). School choice policies and racial segregation: Where white parents' good intentions, anxiety, and privilege collide. American Journal of Education, 119 (2), 261–293.

52.

Rotberg

I.C.

(2012). Is anyone listening? Policy versus research on test-based accountability and charter schools. Teachers College Record. www.tcrecord.org ID Number 16798.

53.

Sattin-Bajaj

& Suarez-Orozco

(2012). English language learner students and charter schools in New York State: Challenges and opportunities. New York, NY: New York Governor's Leadership Team for High Quality Charter Public Schools. http://centerforschoolchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/FINAL-ELL-Report.pdf.

54.

Scott

G.A.

(2012). Charter schools: Additional federal attention needed to help protect access for students with disabilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.

55.

Siegel-Hawley

& Frankenberg

(2011). Does law influence charter school diversity? An analysis of federal and state legislation. Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 16, 321–376.

56.

Soderstrom

& Uusitalo

(2010). School choice and segregation: Evidence from an admission reform. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 112, 55–76.

57.

Stone

Trisi

, & Sherman

(2012). A guide to statistics on historical trends in income inequality. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

58.

Thomson

K.S.

(2010). Externalities and school enrollment policy: A supply-side analysis of school choice in New Zealand. Journal of School Choice, 4, 418–449.

59.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the Top program executive summary. Washington, DC: Author. www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf.

60.

U.S. Department of Education. (2013). Race to the Top fund applicant information. Washington, DC: Author. www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/applicant.html.

61.

United Federation of Teachers. (2010). Separate and unequal: The failure of New York City charter schools to serve the neediest students. New York, NY: Author. www.uft.org/files/attachments/uft-report-2010-01-separate-and-unequal.pdf.

62.

Welner

K.G.

(2013). The dirty dozen: How charter schools influence student enrollment. Teachers College Record. www.tcrecord.org ID Number 17104.

63.

West

& Hind

(2007). School choice in London, England: Characteristics of students in different types of secondary schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 82, 498–529.

64.

Yoon

& Gulson

K.N.

(2010). School choice in the stratilingual city of Vancouver. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31, 703–718.