CohenE.G.LotanR.A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32 (1), 99–120.
3.
DuttonJ. (2011). Science fair season.New York, NY: Hyperion.
4.
Linnenbrink-GarciaL.MiddletonM.J.CianiK.D.EasterM.A.O'KeefeP.A.ZushoA. (2012). The strength of the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal orientations: Theoretical, methodological, and instructional implications. Educational Psychologist, 47 (4), 281–301.
5.
LockeE.A.LathamG.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
MurayamaK.ElliotA.J. (2012). The competition–performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138 (6), 1035–1070.
7.
OlsonS. (2004). Countdown: Six kids vie for glory at the world's toughest math competition.New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
RyanR.M.DeciE.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
9.
SenkoC.HullemanC.S.HarackiewiczJ.M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46 (1), 26–47.