If you offer professional development in science, will teachers come? More importantly, will it matter if they do?
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ. (2008). Teachers' motivation to attend voluntary professional development in K-10 mathematics. In GoosM.BrownR.MakarK. (Eds.), Navigating currents and charting directions: Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 1 (pp. 51–58).
2.
ClaycombC. (2000). High-quality urban school teachers: What they need to enter and to remain in hard-to-staff schools. The State Education Standard, 1 (1), 17–20.
HillJ.HawkK.TaylorK. (2001, December). Professional development: What makes it work?Paper presented at the New Zealand Association for Research in Education Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand.
5.
IngersollR. (2003). Is there a shortage among mathematics and science teachers?Science Educator, 12 (1), 1–9.
6.
Loucks-HorsleyS.StilesK.HewsonP. (1996, May). Principles of effective professional development for mathematics and science education: A synthesis of standards. Issue Brief, 1 (1). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.
7.
MortonB.PeltolaP.HurwitzM.OrlofskyG.StrizekG.GruberK. (2008). Education and certification qualification of departmentalized public high school-level teachers of core subjects: Evidence from the 2003–04 schools and staffing survey.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
8.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America's children.New York, NY: Author.
