A rubric can guide young teachers toward developing classrooms that focus on literacy, rather than shoving it to the sidelines.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmbrusterBonnie, and WilkinsonIan. “Silent Reading, Oral Reading, and Learning from Text.”The Reading Teacher45, no. 2 (October 1991): 154–155.
2.
DanielsHarvey. Literature Circles: Voice and Choice in the Student-Centered Classroom. New York: Stenhouse, 1994.
3.
DurkinDolores. “What Classroom Observations Reveal About Reading Comprehension Instruction.”Reading Research Quarterly14, no. 4 (Winter 1978–79): 481–538.
4.
FieldingLinda, and David PearsonP.. “Synthesis of Research: Reading Comprehension: What Works.”Educational Leadership51, no. 5 (February 1994): 62–67.
5.
HallKathy. “Critical Literacy and the Case for It in the Early Years of School.”Language, Culture, and Curriculum11, no. 2 (1998): 183–194.
6.
HarrisTheodore, and HodgesRichard. The Literacy Dictionary: The Vocabulary of Reading and Writing. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association, 1995.
7.
HarveyStephanie, and GoudvisAnne. Strategies That Work. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse, 2008.
8.
OpitzMichael, and RasinskiTimothy. Goodbye Round Robin. Portsmouth, Maine: Heinemann, 1998.
9.
PressleyMichaelWharton-McDonaldRuthMistretta-HampsonJennifer, and EchevarriaMarissa. “The Nature of Literacy Instruction in Ten Grade-4/5 Classrooms in Upstate New York.”Scientific Studies of Reading2, no. 2 (1998): 159–191.
10.
SmithFrank. Reading FAQ. New York: Teachers College Press, 2007.
11.
TharpRoland G., and GallimoreRonald. “Rousing Schools to Life.”American Educator13, no. 2 (Summer 1989): 20–25, 46–52.
