ClotfelterCharles T.LaddHelenVigdorJacob, and DiazRoger A.. “Do School Accountability Systems Make It More Difficult for Low Performing Schools to Attract and Retain High Quality Teachers?”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management23, no. 2 (2004): 251–271.
2.
FiglioDavid N.“Testing, Crime, and Punishment.”NBER Working Paper no. 11194. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005.
3.
FryerRoland G., and LevittSteven D.. “Understanding the Black-White Test Score Gap in the First Two Years of School.”Review of Economics and Statistics86, no. 2 (2004):447–464.
4.
GoldhaberDan D., and BrewerDominic J.. “Does Teacher Certification Matter? High School Teacher Certification Status and Student Achievement.”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis22, no. 2 (2000):129–145.
5.
HarrisDouglas N., and SassTim R.. “Teacher Training, Teacher Quality, and Student Achievement.”National Center for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research Working Paper #3. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute, 2007.
6.
HeckmanJames J.“Skill Formation and the Economics of Investing in Disadvantaged Children.”Science, June 30, 2006: 1900–1902.
7.
HessFrederick M.Spinning Wheels: The Politics of Urban School Reform. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1998.
8.
KoedelCory, and BettsJulian R.. “Re-Examining the Role of Teacher Quality in the Educational Production Function.”Working Paper #2007–03. Nashville, Tenn.: National Center on Performance Initiatives, 2007.
9.
McCaffreyDanielSassTim R.LockwoodJ.R., and MihalyKata. “The Intertemporal Stability of Teacher Effects.”Education Finance and Policy4, no. 4 (2009): 572–606.
10.
RivkinSteven G.HanushekEric A., and KainJohn F.. “Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement.”Econometrica73, no. 2 (2005): 417–458.
11.
SandersWilliam L., and HornSandra P.. “Research Findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) Database: Implications for Educational Evaluation and Research.”Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education12 (1998): 247–256.
12.
WeissMichael J.“Examining the Measures Used in the Federal Growth Model Pilot Program.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, D.C., March 3, 2008.