From England to Kenya, nations are exploring ways to use salary incentives to recruit and retain teachers, fill vacancies in key areas, and improve student learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DufloEsther, and HannaRema. “Monitoring Works: Getting Teachers to Come to School.”NBER Working Paper no. 11880, Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2007.
2.
GlewwePaulIliasNauman, and KremerMichael. “Teacher Incentives in Developing Countries: Recent Experimental Evidence from Kenya.” Paper presented at the National Conference on Performance Incentives: Their Growing Impact on American K-12 Education, Nashville, Tenn., February 2008.
3.
HanushekEric A.“The Trade-Off Between Child Quantity and Quality.”Journal of Political Economy100, no. 1 (1992): 84–117.
4.
LavyVictor. “Evaluating the Effect of Teachers' Group Performance Incentives on Pupil Achievement.”Journal of Political Economy110, no. 6 (2002): 1286–1317.
5.
LavyVictor. “Performance Pay and Teachers' Effort, Productivity and Grading Ethics.”NBER Working Paper no. 10622. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2004.
6.
McEwanPatrick J., and SantibáñezLucrecia. “Teacher and Principal Incentives in Mexico.” In Incentives to Improve Teaching: Lessons from Latin America, ed. VegasEmiliana, 213–253. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2005.
7.
MizalaAlejandra, and RomagueraPilar. “Teachers' Salary Structure and Incentives in Chile.” In Incentives to Improve Teaching: Lessons from Latin America, ed. VegasEmiliana, 103–150. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2005.
8.
MuralidharanKarthik, and SundararamanVenkatesh. “Teacher Incentives in Developing Countries: Experimental Evidence from India.” Paper presented at the National Conference on Performance Incentives: Their Growing Impact on American K-12 Education, Nashville, Tenn., February 2008.
9.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris: OECD, 2005.
10.
RivkinSteven G.HanushekEric, and KainJohn F.. “Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement.”NBER Working Paper no. 6691 (rev.). Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2001.
11.
RivkinSteven G.HanushekEric, and KainJohn F.. “Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement.”Econometrica73, no. 2 (March 2005): 417–458.
12.
SandersWilliam, and RiversJune. “Cumulative and Residual Effects of Teachers on Future Student Academic Achievement.”Research Progress Report. Knoxville, Tenn.: Value-Added Research and Assessment Center, University of Tennessee, 1996.
13.
SantibáñezLucreciaMartinezJosé F.DatarAshleshaMcEwanPatrick J.Messan SetodjiClaude, and Basuto-DávilaRicardo. Breaking Ground: Analysis of the Assessment System and Impact of Mexico's Teacher Incentive Programme “Carrera Magisterial.”Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corp., 2007.
SclafaniSusan. “A Review of International Practice.” In Evaluating and Rewarding the Quality of Teachers: International Practices, ed. SclafaniSusan. Paris: OECD, 2009.
StrathAnnelie. “Teacher Policy Reforms in Sweden: The Case of Individualized Pay.”Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO, 2004.
