BerendsMarkBodillySusan J., and KirbySheila N.. Facing the Challenges of Whole School Reform: New American Schools After a Decade: Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, 2002.
2.
BermanPaul, and McLaughlinMilbrey W.. Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change: Vol VIII. Implementing and Sustaining Innovations. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, 1978.
3.
BodillySusan J.New American Schools' Conception of Break the Mold Designs: How Designs Evolved and Why. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, 1998.
4.
DatnowAmandaHubbardLea, and MehanHugh. Extending Educational Reform: From One School to Many. London: Routledge Falmer, 2002.
5.
DesimoneLaura. “How Can Comprehensive School Reform Models Be Successfully Implemented?”Review of Educational Research72, no. 3 (2002): 433–479.
6.
ElmoreRichard F.“Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice.”Harvard Educational Review66, no. 1 (1996): 1–26.
7.
HillHeather C.“Policy Is Not Enough: Language and the Interpretation of State Standards.”American Educational Research Journal38, no. 2 (2001): 289–320.
8.
McLaughlinMilbrey W., and MitraDana. “Theory-Based Change and Change-Based Theory: Going Deeper, Going Broader.”Journal of Educational Change2, no. 4 (2002): 301–323.
9.
PenuelWilliam R., and MeansBarbara. “Implementation Variation and Fidelity in an Inquiry Science Program: Analysis of GLOBE Data Reporting Patterns.”Journal of Research in Science Teaching41, no. 3 (2004): 294–315.
10.
RigganMatthew, and SupovitzJonathan A.. “Interpreting, Supporting, and Resisting Change: The Geography of Leadership in Reform Settings.” In The Implementation Gap: Understanding Reform in High Schools, ed. SupovitzJonathan A. and WeinbaumElliot H.. New York: Teachers College Press, 2008.
11.
RowanBrianCamburnEric, and BarnesCarol. “Benefiting from Comprehensive School Reform: A Review of Research on CSR Implementation.” In Putting the Pieces Together: Lessons from Comprehensive School Reform Research, ed. CrossChristopher T.. Washington, D.C.: National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive School Reform, 2004.
12.
ShiffmanCatherine D.RigganMatthewMassellDianeGoldwasserMatthew, and AndersonJoy. “Channeling Adaptation: The Role of Design in Enactment Patterns.” In The Implementation Gap: Understanding Reform in High Schools, ed. SupovitzJonathan A. and WeinbaumElliot H.. New York: Teachers College Press, 2008.
13.
SpillaneJames P., and ZeuliJohn S.. “Reform and Teaching: Exploring Patterns of Practice in the Context of National and State Mathematics Reforms.”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis21, no. 1 (Spring 1999): 1–28.
14.
SupovitzJonathan A.“Implementation as Iterative Refraction.” In The Implementation Gap: Understanding Reform in High Schools, ed. SupovitzJonathan A. and WeinbaumElliot H.. New York: Teachers College Press, 2008. a
15.
SupovitzJonathan A.“Instructional Leadership in American High Schools.” In Effective Teacher Leadership: Using Research to Inform and Reform, ed. ManginMelinda M. and Ray StoelingaSara. New York: Teachers College Press, 2008. b
16.
SupovitzJonathan A., and TaylorBrooke S.. “Systemic Education Evaluation: Evaluating the Impact of Systemwide Reform in Education.”American Journal of Evaluation26, no. 2 (2005): 204–230.
17.
SupovitzJonathan A., and WeinbaumElliot H.. The Implementation Gap: Understanding Reform in High Schools. New York: Teachers College Press, 2008.
18.
WeinbaumElliot H.ColeRussell P.WeissMichael J., and SupovitzJonathan A.. “Going with the Flow: Communication and Reform in High Schools.” In The Implementation Gap: Understanding Reform in High Schools, ed. SupovitzJonathan A. and WeinbaumElliot H.. New York: Teachers College Press, 2008.
19.
WeinbaumElliot H.ShiffmanCatherine D., and GoertzMargaret E.. “Tilting the Scales: Central Office Support for External School Reform.” In The Implementation Gap: Understanding Reform in High Schools, ed. SupovitzJonathan A. and WeinbaumElliot H.. New York: Teachers College Press, 2008.