AlvermanDonna E.QianGaoyin, and HyndCynthia E.. “Effects of Interactive Discussion and Text Type on Learning Counterintuitive Science Concepts.”Journal of Educational Research88 (1995): 146–154.
2.
AuWayne. “High Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis.”Educational Researcher36, no. 5 (2007): 258–267.
3.
DriverRosNewtonPaul, and OsborneJonathan F.. “Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms.”Science Education84, no. 3 (2000): 287–312.
4.
DuschlRickSchweingruberHeidi, and ShouseAndrew. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching in Grades K-8. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, 2006.
5.
HillChristopher. “The Post-Scientific Society.”Issues in Science and Technology24, no. 1 (2008): 78–84.
6.
JenningsLouise B., and MillsHeidi. “Constructing a Discourse of Inquiry: Findings from a Five-Year Ethnography in One Elementary School.”Teachers College Record111, no. 7 (2009): 1583–1618.
7.
MartinAnita, and HandBrian. “Factors Affecting the Implementation of Argument in the Elementary Science Classroom: A Longitudinal Case Study.”Research in Science Education39, no. 1 (2009): 17–38.
8.
MillarRobin, and OsborneJonathan. Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future. London: King's College London, 1998.
9.
National Research Council.Research on Future Skill Demands. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2008.
10.
NolenSusan B.“Learning Environment, Motivation and Achievement in High School Science.”Journal of Research in Science Teaching40, no. 4 (2003): 347–368.
11.
OsborneJonathan F., and DillonJustin. Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation, 2008.
12.
OsborneJonathan F.ErduranSibel, and SimonShirley. The IDEAS Project. London: King's College, 2004.
13.
OsborneJonathan F.SimonShirley, and CollinsSue. “Attitudes Towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.”International Journal of Science Education25, no. 9 (2003): 1049–1079.
14.
SjøbergSvein, and SchreinerCamilla. “How Do Learners in Different Cultures Relate to Science and Technology? Results and Perspectives from the Project ROSE.”Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching6, no. 2 (2005): 1–16.
15.
ZoharAnat, and NemetFlora. “Fostering Students' Knowledge and Argumentation Skills Through Dilemmas in Human Genetics.”Journal of Research in Science Teaching39, no. 1 (2002): 35–62.