Abstract

Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bracey
Gerald W.
“A Test Everyone Will Fail.”
Washington Post . May 3, 2007 , p. A25 . www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/02/AR2007050202004.html.
2.
Bracey
Gerald W.
“Cut Scores, NAEP Achievement Levels and Their Discontents.”
School Administrator
65 , no. 6 (June 2008 ): 20 –23 .
3.
Loomis
Susan C.
, and
Lyn Bourque
Mary
. National Assessment of Educational Progress Achievement Levels 1992–1998 for Mathematics . Washington, D.C. : National Assessment Governing Board , July 2001 . www.nagb.org/publications/mathbook.pdf.
4.
Podesta
John
. “Remarks on Education Report Roll Out.”
U.S. Chamber of Commerce , Washington, D.C. , February 28, 2007 . www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/02/podesta_education_remarks.html.
5.
Scott
Leslie A.
Ingels
Steven J.
, and
Owings
Jeffrey A.
. Interpreting 12th-Graders NAEP-Scaled Mathematics Performance Using High School Predictors and Postsecondary Outcomes from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88) . Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Educational Sciences , 2007 . http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007328.pdf.
6.
Stevens
John H.
“Grade 12 Preparedness.” Paper presented to the National Assessment Governing Board, Washington D.C., March 4, 2009 . www.nagb.org/who-we-are/20-anniversary/stevens-12th-preparedness.pdf.
7.
Viadero
Debra
, and
Olson
Lynn
. “Focus on ‘Basic’ Achievement Level on NAEP Stirs Concern.”
Education Week , November 2, 2005 . www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2005/11/02/10naepbasic.h25.html?r=1-72592868.
