American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), and National Council for Measurement in Education (NCME).Standards for Psychological and Educational Tests. Washington D.C.: AERA, APA, and NCME, 1999.
2.
BriggsDerek C.AlonzoAlicia C.SchwabCheryl, and WilsonMark. “Diagnostic Assessment with Ordered Multiple-Choice Items.”Educational Assessment11, no. 1 (2006): 33–63.
3.
BriggsDerek C., and WilsonMark. “Generalizability in Item Response Modeling.”Journal of Educational Measurement44, no. 2 (2006): 131–155.
4.
De BoeckPaul, and WilsonMark, eds. Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2004.
5.
KennedyCathleen A., and DraneyKaren. “Mapping Multiple Dimensions of Student Learning: The Construct Map Program.”Journal of Applied Measurement10, no. 1 (2009): 22–37.
6.
KennedyCathleen A.WilsonMark, and DraneyKaren. “ConstructMap.”Computer program. Berkeley, Calif.: Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research Center, University of California, 2006.
7.
National Research Council (NRC).Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2001.
8.
SipusicMichael. Moderation in All Things: A Class Act. Video A 94720-1670. Berkeley, Calif.: Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research Center, Graduate School of Education, University of California, 1999.
9.
WestEd.Partnership for the Assessment of Science-Based Science: Frequently Asked Questions and Sample Assessment Items. 2005. www.wested.org/cs/we/view/rs/612.
10.
WilsonMark. Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005.
11.
MarkWilson, and HoskensMachteld. “The Rater Bundle Model.”Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics26, no. 3 (2001): 283–306.
12.
WilsonMark, and SloaneKathryn. “From Principles to Practice: An Embedded Assessment System.”Applied Measurement in Education13, no. 2 (2000): 181–208.
