Researchers who ponder why so little research makes its way into practice should explore how and why certain research bridges the gap.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeyerbachBarbaraWalshChristine, and VannattaRachel. “From Teaching Technology to Using Technology to Enhance Student Learning: Preservice Teachers' Changing Perceptions of Technology Infusion.”Journal of Technology and Teacher Education9, no. 1 (2001): 105–127.
2.
CarpenterThomas. P.FennemaElizabethPetersonPenelope L.ChiangChi-Pang, and LoefMegan. “Using Knowledge of Children's Mathematical Thinking in Classroom Teaching: An Experimental Study.”American Educational Research Journal26, no. 4 (1989): 499–531.
3.
CubanLarry. Oversold & Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.
4.
HandalBoris, and HerringtonAnthony. “Mathematics Teachers' Beliefs and Curriculum Reform.”Mathematics Education Research Journal15, no. 1 (2003): 59–69.
5.
LeeValerie E.BrykAnthony S., and SmithJulia B.. “The Organization of Effective High Schools.” In Review of Research in Education19, ed. Linda Darling-Hammond, 171–267. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association, 1993.
6.
LordFrederic M.Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.
7.
MostellerFrederick. “The Tennessee Study of Class Size in the Early School Grades.”The Future of Children5, no. 2 (1995): 113–127.
8.
PorterAndrewFlodenRobertFeemanDonaldSchmidtWilliam, and SchwilleJack. “Content Determinants in Elementary School Mathematics.” In Perspectives on Research on Effective Mathematical Teaching, ed. GrouwsDouglas A. and CooneyThomas J., 96–11. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
9.
RaudenbushStephen, and BrykAnthony. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2002.
10.
SlavinRobert E., and MaddenNancy A., eds. One Million Children: Success for All. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press, 2001.
11.
SmithMarshall S., and O'DayJennifer. “Systemic School Reform.” In The Politics of Curriculum and Testing (Politics of Education Association Yearbook, 1990), ed. FuhrmanSusan H. and MalenBetty, 233–267. London: Taylor & Francis, 1991.
12.
StecherBrian M.McCaffreyDaniel F., and BugliariDelia. “The Relationship Between Exposure to Class Size Reduction and Student Achievement in California.”Education Policy Analysis Archives11, no. 40 (2003).
13.
ZhaoYongPughKevinSheldonSteve, and ByersJoe. “Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations.”Teachers College Record104, no. 3 (2002): 482–515.
