BirmanBeatriceF.LauraDesimoneAndrewC. PorterMichaelS. Garet. “Designing Professional Development That Works.”Educational Leadership57 (May 2000): 28–33.
2.
CorcoranThomasB.SusanH. FuhrmanBelcherC.L., “The District Role in Instructional Improvement.”Phi Delta Kappan83 (September 2001): 78–84.
3.
EastonLoisB., ed. Powerful Designs for Professional Learning. Oxford, Ohio: National Staff Development Council, 2004.
4.
GaretMichaelS.PorterAndrew C.LauraDesimoneBeatriceF. BirmanKwangSuk Yoon. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers.”American Educational Research Journal38 (Winter 2001): 915–945.
5.
GuskeyThomasR.“Apply Time with Wisdom.”Journal of Staff Development20 (Spring 1999): 10–15.
6.
GuskeyThomasR.Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press, 2000.
GuskeyThomasR.“What Makes Professional Development Effective?”Phi Delta Kappan84 (June 2003): 748–750.
9.
HollowayJohnH.“The Promise and Pitfalls of Site-Based Management.”Educational Leadership57 (October 2000): 81–82.
10.
KennedyMaryM.Form and Substance in Inservice Teachers Education. Research Monograph No. 13. Madison, Wis.: National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1998.
11.
LathamAndrewS.“Site-Based Management: Is It Working?”Educational Leadership55 (April 1998): 85–86.
12.
National Center for Educational Statistics. Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: School Year 2005–06 (Fiscal Year 2006). Washington, D.C.: Institute for Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, 2008. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/expenditures.
13.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 2008.
14.
National Staff Development Council (NSDC). NSDC's Standards for Staff Development. Oxford, Ohio: National Staff Development Council, 2001.
15.
RaudenbushStephenW.“Learning from Attempts to Improve Schooling: The Contribution of Methodological Diversity.”Educational Researcher34 (February 2005): 25–31.
16.
ShulmanLeeS.“Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.”Educational Researcher15 (October 1986): 4–14.
17.
WayneAndrewSukYoon KwangStephanieCronenPeiZhuMichaelS. Garet. “Experimenting with Teacher Professional Development: Motives and Methods.”Educational Researcher37 (May 2008): 469–479.
18.
YoonKwangSukTeresaDuncanWen-YuLee SilviaBethScarlossKathyL. Shapley. Reviewing the Evidence on How Teacher Professional Development Affects Student Achievement. Issues and Answers Report, REL 2007 - No. 033. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest, 2007. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
