Barksdale-LaddMaryKarenF. Thomas. “What's at Stake in High-Stakes Testing: Teachers and Parents Speak Out.”Journal of Teacher Education51, no. 5 (2000): 384–397.
4.
CohenPeterA.JamesA. KulikKulikChen-Lin C., “Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-Analysis of Findings.”American Educational Research Journal19 (1982): 237–248.
5.
DonaldsonJeff. “Teachers Now Make House Calls.”Desert Sun, March 17, 2002, p. A8.
6.
EllisonDouglasG.“Tutoring.” In The Psychology of Teaching Methods, ed. NathanielL. Gage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press1976.
7.
FarkasSteveJeanJohnsonAnnDuffett. Playing Their Parts: Parents and Teachers Talk About Parental Involvement in Public Schools. New York: Public Agenda1999.
8.
GeisslerBarbara. “Leading the Way to Family Literacy: A Study of Whiteside County Even Start.”Sterling, Ill.: Whiteside County Parenting Project2000.
9.
GordonEdwardE.“Home Tutoring Programs Gain Respectability.”Phi Delta Kappan64 (February 1983): 398–399.
10.
GordonEdwardE.Tutor Quest: Finding Effective Education for Children and Adults. Bloomington, Ind.: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation2002.
11.
GordonEdwardE.Peer Tutoring: A Teacher's Resource Guide. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Education2005.
12.
GordonEdwardE.ElaineH. Gordon. Literacy in America: Historic Journey and Contemporary Solutions. Westport, Conn.: Praeger2003.
13.
GordonEdwardE.RonaldR. MorganJudithPonticell. “The Individualized Training Alternative.”Training & Development49 (September 1995): 52–55.
14.
GordonEdwardE.RonaldR. MorganO'MalleyCharles J.JudithPonticell. The Tutoring Revolution: Applying Research for Best Practices, Policy Implications, and Student Achievement. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Education2007.
15.
GordonEdwardE.RonaldR. MorganJudithPonticellCharlesJ. O'Malley. “Tutoring Solutions for No Child Left Behind: Research, Practice and Policy Implications.”NASSP Bulletin88, no. 638 (2004): 56–68.
16.
GrubbW. Norton. “Dynamic Inequality and Intervention: Lessons from a Small Country.”Phi Delta Kappan89 (October 2007): 105–114.
17.
ManzoKathleenK., “College-Based High Schools Fill Growing Need.”Education Week, May 25, 2005, pp. 1, 17.
18.
MathesPatriciaG.LynnS. Fuchs. “The Efficacy of Peer Tutoring in Reading for Students with Mild Disabilities: A Best-Evidence Synthesis.”School Psychology Review23, no. 1 (1994): 59–80.
19.
MorganRonaldR.JudithA. PonticellEdwardE. Gordon. Enhancing Learning in Training and Adult Education. Westport, Conn.: Praeger1998.
20.
RosenshineBarakNormaFurst. The Effects of Tutoring upon Pupil Achievement: A Research Review. Washington, D.C.: Office of Education1969. ERIC #ED064462.
21.
ShanahanTimothy. “On the Effectiveness and Limitations of Tutoring in Reading.” In Review of Research in Education23, ed. PearsonP. DavidAshgarIran-Nejad. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association1998.
22.
ShanahanTimothyRebeccaBarr. “Reading Recovery: An Independent Evaluation of the Effects of an Early Instructional Intervention for At-Risk Learners.”Reading Research Quarterly30, no. 4 (1995): 958–997.
23.
StommenLindaT.BarbaraF. Mates. “Learning to Love Reading: Interview with Older Children and Teens.”Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy48, no. 3 (2004): 188–200.
24.
U.S. Department of Education. “Engaging Parents in Education: Lessons from Five Parental Information and Resource Centers.” June 2007. ERIC #ED498407. a
25.
U.S. Department of Education. “Galvanizing the Community Charter School Provides Greater Choice to Colorado Latinos.”The Achiever6 (November/December 2007): 1, 3. b
26.
VellutinoFrankR.DonnaM. ScanlonEdwardR. SipaySheilaG. Small“Cognitive Profiles of Difficult-to-Remediate and Readily Remediated Poor Readers: Intervention as a Vehicle for Distinguishing Between Cognitive and Experiential Deficits as Basic Cause of Specific Reading Disability.”Journal of Educational Psychology88, no. 4 (1996): 601–638.
27.
WasikBarbaraA.RobertE. Slavin. “Preventing Early Reading Failure with One-to-One Tutoring: A Review of Five Programs.”Reading Research Quarterly28, no. 2 (1993): 179–200.